Not exact matches
Kyoto regulates all sources of carbon dioxide as well as other greenhouse gases, but reliable long - term data by country are available only
for carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels (which accounts
for about two - thirds of the
human contribution to global warming).
The IPCC was recognized
for its
contributions over the last two decades
to create an «an ever - broader informed consensus about the connection between
human activities and
global warming.
Policymakers are only too happy
to substitute answers
for insights, though, and are given
to report that «we know» the
human contribution to global warming when, of course, we know no such thing.
For those desiring papers with more explicit positions on the cause of
global warming, we also used categories that only included papers that explicitly quantified the
human contribution to global warming.
The Cato Institute's Patrick Michaels,
for instance, has written several books acknowledging
human contributions to global warming.
Second, we did look
for papers that quantify the
human contribution to global warming, and most are not that specific.
Compared
to previous HadEX / CMIP3 - based results, which identified
human contributions to the observed
warming of extreme temperatures on
global and regional scales, the current results provide better agreement with observations, particularly
for the intensification of
warm extremes.
E.g., research assumes greenhouse gas emissions cause
warming without explicitly stating
humans are the cause»... carbon sequestration in soil is important
for mitigating
global climate change» (4a) No position Does not address or mention the cause of
global warming (4b) Uncertain Expresses position that
human's role on recent
global warming is uncertain / undefined «While the extent of
human - induced
global warming is inconclusive...» (5) Implicit rejection Implies
humans have had a minimal impact on
global warming without saying so explicitly E.g., proposing a natural mechanism is the main cause of
global warming»... anywhere from a major portion
to all of the
warming of the 20th century could plausibly result from natural causes according
to these results» (6) Explicit rejection without quantification Explicitly minimizes or rejects that
humans are causing
global warming»... the
global temperature record provides little support
for the catastrophic view of the greenhouse effect» (7) Explicit rejection with quantification Explicitly states that
humans are causing less than half of
global warming «The
human contribution to the CO2 content in the atmosphere and the increase in temperature is negligible in comparison with other sources of carbon dioxide emission»»
Our survey also included categories
for papers that quantified the
human contribution to global warming.