I continue to (a) appreciate his collection of positive feedback loops, and (b) disagree that his time - frame
for human extinction is possible.
Apart from executing the unique trick of having us root
for human extinction, War foregrounds a beautiful tension between the savage instinct for retribution and higher restraint — ironically fought within the heart of an animal.
to perfecting the means
for human extinction.
Our politicians and the technicians of violence have shown great dedication to perfecting the means
for human extinction.
Not exact matches
On the contrary the fishing of sharks
for their fins by
humans has brought many species to the brink of
extinction.
«I really think there are two fundamental paths [
for humans]: One path is we stay on Earth forever, and some eventual
extinction event wipes us out,» he said.
@pockets: So, what scares you is that someone who believes everyone on Earth was created
for a reason, and who believes that all live is sacred, is given the power to choose whether or not to bring about the
extinction of the
human race.
Even though Rickover seems given over to the probability of nuclear
extinction, he nevertheless seems to appreciate that weapons are not «neutral,» that their presence introduces a compelling temptation
for human beings to use them.
Thus, there is the entropy at the atomic and molecular levels in the form of the loss of physical energy; then there is entropy in the form of the
extinction of life at the biological level; next, there is the entropy appropriate
for the level of
human life, namely,
human death.
First, with reference to the topic of the last section, it seems that Whitehead is doubtful that so sharp a line can be drawn between animals and
humans that there is real warrant
for affirming total
extinction of all animals and survival of all
humans.
Death is «the
extinction of this never - to - be repeated
human being,
for whom I had cared and
for whom his survivors now grieve.»
What he opposes most stridently in this book is not religious doubt itself or attempts to understand religion as a
human construct or a biological phenomenon, but rather what he sees as a very artificial and incomplete view of
human nature and its purpose: the very presumption that religion can be explained away as unnecessary and that such materialistic perspectives could be definitive or anywhere near ultimately satisfactory
for beings who are obviously designed to crave so much more than mere birth, death, and
extinction.
There are other parenting truths however that are so terrifying that popular parenting books don't dare mention them
for fear that every reasonable adult on earth would immediately line up
for voluntary sterilization if they knew and quickly cause the
extinction of the
human race.
«Until around 100,000 years ago, a dispassionate observer would have no basis
for predicting either the
extinction of rival
human species or Homo sapiens» current global ecological dominion,» Shea says.
But in this darker interpretation, the half man and half horse is no match
for human horsemen — and appears doomed
for extinction.
This massive environmental change is believed to have created population bottlenecks in the various species that existed at the time; this in turn accelerated differentiation of the isolated
human populations, eventually leading to the
extinction of all the other
human species except
for the branch that became modern
humans.
Fisher says that it isn't clear whether the knife - wielders killed the mastodon or simply scavenged the carcass, but «however
humans and mastodons interacted, it took at least two millennia
for the process of
extinction to run to completion».
That's good news
for lemurs in their native home of Madagascar, where lemurs live on the brink of
extinction, and where
human population growth makes contact with people and inter-species exchange of infectious disease increasingly likely.
Unlike many bird species that are now extinct on the Earth's small islands, the Eastern Bluebird and the Hispaniolan Crossbill disappeared long before the first people arrived, uncoupling their
extinction from
human actions, such as the introduction of new predators and habitat loss
for agricultural use.
«The idea that... the presence of
humans alone is fully responsible
for the
extinction is not tenable,» he says.
Human - caused climate change, ocean acidification and species
extinctions may eventually threaten the collapse of civilization, according to some scientists, while other people argue that
for political or economic reasons we should allow industrial development to continue without restrictions.
«There was anecdotal evidence too: both thylacines and devils lasted
for over 40,000 years following the arrival of
humans in Australia; their mainland
extinction about 3000 years ago was just after dingoes were introduced to Australia; and the fact that thylacines and devils persisted on Tasmania, which was never colonised by dingoes.
«Prior to our paper, the common view was that the
human Y was headed
for extinction, but we've found that it is not about to crash and burn.»
The specter of existential threats is raised to reflect the grave risks to
human health and species
extinction from warming beyond 5 ° C, which has not been experienced
for at least the past 20 million years.
Human activity is responsible
for a sixth
extinction of thousands of species, so Paul Ehrlich and a colleague call
for educating women to slow population growth
Then there are the bees: Regardless of whether honeybees become extinct as a species as a result of colony collapse disorder, climate change and other threats, the local
extinction of various honeybee populations and the pollination they provide could spell disaster
for human agriculture.
Since people also arrived after that time, it has been impossible to determine whether natural changes or
human influence are most responsible
for these
extinctions.
In the review, the scientists report analyses of the most comprehensive radiocarbon data set of Caribbean mammals and
human arrivals in the Caribbean, representing 57
extinction and extirpation (when a population vanishes from an island) events
for native species.
The authors showed that after the initial waves of
human arrival, mammal
extinctions followed, presumably first caused by hunting and later by forest clearing
for agriculture, which reduces the habitat
for native mammals.
While the overlap between people and the fauna is not proof positive of
human causes
for the many
extinction events in the region, it is an important step to determine why these mammals went extinct.
Scientists still do not fully know the precise reasons
for the
extinction of many species; it probably took place due to a combination of climate change and hunting by
humans.
«The near
extinction of sea otters is one of the most dramatic examples of
human - induced impacts to the structure and functioning of temperate nearshore marine ecosystems,» said Rebecca G. Martone, of the Center
for Ocean Solutions at Stanford University.
For the past few millennia, and particularly the past century,
humans have been the driving force behind the overwhelming majority of species»
extinctions.
These local
extinctions could also extend to species that
humans depend on
for food and resources.
The current rate of
extinction is up to 1,000 times faster than it would be without
humans, according to the International Union
for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN).
The researchers looked at the pattern of
extinctions for 177 species of mammals weighing 10 kilograms or more between 132,000 years ago (the height of the next - to - last ice age to strike the Northern Hemisphere) and 1000 years ago (a time at which the ecological effects of
human exploration and expansion became unquestionable).
Do I fear
for the
extinction of the
human species?
This article appeared in print under the headline «
Humans blamed
for Caribbean ground sloth
extinction»
Current competing hypotheses
for the mammoth's
extinction point to
human hunting or climate change, possibly combining in a deadly one - two punch.
Biographical sketches of the people he has interviewed
for the book get approximately equal airtime with their opinions about
human extinction and transcendence.
Other films challenged audiences to confront the role of
humans in wildlife
extinction, invited viewers to think twice about our seemingly insatiable appetites
for food and fuel, and encouraged the adoption of more sustainable ways of life.
The new study published in Scientific Reports, has shown that the tiny creatures, will survive the risk of
extinction from all astrophysical catastrophes, and be around
for at least 10 billion years — far longer than the
human race.
Thisapparent
extinction, far from creating a domino effect of furtherlosses, may have created an opportunity
for other grasshopper species.The red - legged grasshopper (Melanoplus femurrubrum), which wasresponsible
for newsworthy outbreaks in Idaho two years ago, thrives onground broken by agriculture and other
human endeavors.
«The thylacine was a marsupial carnivore, now infamous
for its recent
human - driven
extinction from Tasmania following the arrival of Europeans and their bounty hunting schemes,» says project leader Associate Professor Jeremy Austin, Deputy Director of ACAD.
Roberto Cazzolla Gatti, who began to be interested in the role of cooperation in evolution since 2011, when he published a controversial paper titled «Evolution is a cooperative process: the biodiversity - related niches differentiation theory (BNDT) can explain» concluded: «These theoretical findings, confirmed by empirical approaches, should motivate our species to think before it is too late about how
human competition,
for the first time in the history of life on Earth, has been systematically leading to the
extinction of animals and plants.
Stirton's work not only shines a light «on a species being pushed to the brink of
extinction, but also on the issues of
human morality and compassion
for the animals we share this planet with», says Liz Bonnin, who presents the awards.
As he told me and recounted in his (excellent) memoirs, The Trembling Mountain, Klitzman spent a year with the Fore (
FOR - ay) tribe of Papua New Guinea, who are, along with the inhabitants of the British Isles, still the only two known
human populations to have ever been threatened with virtual
extinction at the hands of a submicroscopic particle known as a prion.
This is clearest in the Americas, where the debate over whether
humans or climate caused Late Pleistocene
extinctions has raged
for decades (the truth is probably a combination of these two factors, including a trophic cascade caused by
human - mediated
extinctions of large carnivores).
«At this time, we can't say how much of a role
humans played in the
extinction of X. mcgregori on Jamaica, but the timing is too coincidental
for there to be no role,» says Cooke.
Unsustainable hunting
for consumption and trade of wild meat (also known as bushmeat) by
humans represents a significant
extinction threat to wild terrestrial mammal populations, perhaps most notably in parts of Asia, Africa and South America [4 — 6].