Preoccupation with form over substance combined with denial and avoidance behavior are the chief causal factors
for human failure — from the individual and family right up to the national level.
Talk about provision
for human failure, and I see Jesus stumbling up a wilderness trail with a cross on his back.
While I view table fellowship with God as the constant over the whole range, atoning
for human failure is at least a part of what God provides for in sacrifice.
Not exact matches
The entrepreneur develops a business plan, acquires the
human and other required resources, and is fully responsible
for its success or
failure.»
The
human tendency to hope
for the best and try to avoid
failure at all costs gets in the way, and organizational hierarchies exacerbate it.
Manufacturing stoppages, delays, and disruptions — whether they're caused by equipment
failure,
human error, or a combination of the two — are a billion - dollar headache
for manufacturers.
While Syria is equipped with a relatively sophisticated air defense system, a lack of training, command and control and other
human factors are probably responsible
for the
failure of the system during the attack.
I agree with L.Nielsen's sentiment that you are «almost there» — close to realising that this is the only life you have and that all your effort should be directed at living it well
for it's own sake, close to realising that you are strong enough as an individual to face the world without the psychological crutch you call god, close to realising that you are a good
human being in your own right, close to realising that your own successes,
failures, loves and fears are yours and yours alone, not attibutable to an imaginary creator.
Would that point to a mode of thinking which does not (
for example) take feminist notions and
human fatherly
failures (or seeming successes) and press them back into the doctrine of God?
These gifts combined with a free university education to so many people
for whom there were then no appropriate jobs, as well as a civil war, led to the
failure of the experiment failed, but in a time when it is clear, at least to me, that global pursuit of more and more wealth is suicidal
for the
human race, I think it would be worthwhile to study such efforts.
That is to say, irony can certainly recognize that the incongruities that throng
human experience typically frustrate the quest
for truth; but, having seen as much, irony is then impotent to do anything more than unveil
failure and vanquish pretense.
Religious people speak of God when
human knowledge (perhaps simply because they are too lazy to think) come to an end, or when
human resources fall — in fact it is always the deus ex machina that they bring on to the scene, either
for the apparent solution of insoluble problems, or as strength in
human failure — always, that is to say, exploiting
human weakness or
human boundaries.11
For Jesus» language in all its vigorous overstatement still reflects a sense of divine fury over the
failure of the divine purpose to work itself out in the actions of
human beings that does not compute with our urbane, 20th - century middle - class liberal Christianity.
At the very least, the
failure to generate more beings able to sustain values at the
human level does not speak well
for its beneficence or significance.
For it holds that all the evils of the
human condition are, in the final analysis, traceable to the drastic
human failure to acknowledge and experience the reality of his presence.
In order to settle this issue, our Creator, Jehovah God, has allowed mankind to be ruled by Satan (though most are unaware of it, 1 John 5:19)
for over 6000 years of
human history to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Satan's way of ruling is a miserable
failure and while at the same time to see who will firmly support Jehovah God's rulership.
The
failures and vast
human costs of modern «salvation myths» are now well known, as is the capacity of democratic capitalism to raise up the poor, protect
human rights, and allow
for unprecedented freedom of thought and action.
At this stage, it is Catholic teaching itself which is felt in some obscure way to be responsible
for the abuse, rather than
human failure at the individual and institutional level, and other Christian denominations are beginning to wake up to the fact that this is a brush with which they too are ultimately tarred, since (C. S. Lewis again), most Catholic teaching is simply Christian doctrine.
Plato's account of the slavish / tyrannical soul - type cultivated in the population by a tyrant would suggest that a darker vision of
human failure than Hobbes» nightmare is possible: perpetual tyranny, with only dynasty changes possible
for a population utterly debased in soul.
And they even accentuate the
failure of
human community
for those who do not «fit» the economic, educational, racial or sexual mold that the churches still project.
At best it has been regarded as a reluctant concession to
human sin and frailty, a painful reminder of our
failure to fulfill the exalted standards which God holds
for marriage.
To fail to be one's true
human self is to fail in maintaining on one's part the right relationship with God in the divine intention
for mankind and at the same moment a
failure in right relationships with other men and women and children, characterized as it should be by the caring, sharing, giving, and receiving which brings about a condition of peace and concord — which is shalom or abundance of life.
This is «redemption», not as if it were merely a rescue from
human failure but as an indication of and an empowering
for the «wholeness of life» (shalom, as the Hebrew has it) which God purposes
for men and women both in their personal existence and in their social belonging.
Over the course of cultural evolution, due to an impotence at the heart of the will and to recurrent
failures in ever - renewed struggles
for ascendency,
human will to power lost its good cheer and creatively turned against itself.
But
for its members it will fulfill the demands of being
human: giving a sense of ultimate meaning, offering release from personal
failure, creating a noble identity of integrity, fostering the richness of a caring community, and upholding a standard of perfection which will both judge and inspire.
Christianity would be a sorry
failure today if it kept itself aloof from the search
for constructive solutions of
human problems.
«20 God could not become a man without thereby abandoning his divinity (as in Altizer's Sabellianism), but he becomes fully
human in intimately incorporating into his own being peculiarly
human experiences and sensitivities, thus accepting an inexhaustible concern
for human purposes, achievements, and
failures.
If CCM is nothing more than a marketing tool
for Christianity, then it will never allow
for the full cultural expressions of
human failure that true artistry demands.
For instance, Phillip Berryman writes in Commonweal, the liberal Catholic journal, about the
human costs of the U.S. action, and why it may turn out to be a
failure in the long term.
Again, in men's acts of worship, there is place
for acknowledgment of
human failure,
for sin,
for violation of the taboos which it is thought that the god has imposed.
Indeed, one of the
failures in much contemporary explanation of
human life — as,
for example, by some of our modern secular sociologists — is precisely at this point.
These readings all picture
human failures which make it impossible
for the law to satisfy the demands we make of it.
It suggests that, in addition to the contempt shown
for human life in these practices, they are also very bad medicine: «One is struck by the fact that, in any other area of medicine, ordinary professional ethics would never allow a medical procedure which involved such a high number of
failures and fatalities» (DP 15).
First, as all who have prayed seriously will agree, the cosmic Lover is enabled to use the
human agent, despite that agent's
failures and defects,
for the good that he would establish.
The Inquisitor eventually comes to visit him in his cell, mocks him, berates him, denounces him
for his
failure and the
failure of the ideas of love [167] and servanthood and the exaltation of
human freedom that he brought.
Of course,
for Biblical authors also
human sexuality is one of the areas of life that should be in the service of God, and, to be sure, our
failure to respond to this call is sinful.
It makes
human beings with the deepest personal identity responsible
for their actions, successes and
failures, without denying the urgency of the struggle
for social, economic, and political pre-requisites of righteousness, equality, and brotherhood.
The possibilities which are presented are blessedness which comes from self - fulfillment and the acceptance by God of that self - fulfillment — all of this, of course, in relationship with others and not in any presumed
human isolation of self hood — or the disintegration or
failure which comes from self - destruction or rejection by God because there is nothing to be received by God in His consequent nature
for the furthering of His purpose of good in the course of the process of creative advance.
Thus
for each of us, the exacting and inescapable question, which must be faced and answered, is the question of our total mortal life as we are now living it, a question which arises from our mortality with the responsibility which that entails, which puts itself to us in the form of our measuring up to the possibility of becoming authentically ourselves, and which issues in our realization (not so much in thought as in deeply felt experience as existing men) of blessedness, as we know ourselves becoming what we truly are, or in destruction or damnation, as we know ourselves both frustrated men and
failures in our
human fulfillment.
A weak moral structure will lead to individuals who act
for themselves or with disregard to the needs of the society, resulting in internal conflict and the likely
failure of the society if the members aren't capable of completely independent survival (and
humans aren't).
The italics are Teilhard's own; and the succeeding pages of the essay from which the quotation comes show that
for him «what has gone wrong» was the
failure of much traditional Christian teaching and preaching to see that the world — the whole created order in its materiality, along with man's grasp of the importance of secular effort and achievement — is an ongoing movement in which significance is given to
human life.
These movements were criticized in the further development of theology
for their naive identification of Christianity with a social programme and their
failure to recognize the limits set by sin to any
human accomplishment.
This lack of regard
for the specific praxis that Jesus deliberately espouses, which may be said to lie in the consciousness that he embodied the dynamics of kingdom, stemmed from Banerjea's and Upadhyaya's
failure to project the historical Jesus as the paradigm of
human living.
Now I come close to the theme of this article: one writer, and I have found no other, in the early Middle Ages attacked classical theism head - on precisely on its two most vulnerable points — its affirmation of, or
failure definitely to reject, unqualified theological determinism, and its commitment to endless posthumous careers
for human persons, making them in that respect rivals to God.
With all its
failures, Christianity provides a more realistic and hopeful basis
for approaching the real issues of intercultural life today than does the Enlightenment way of affirming
human dignity.
Speaking to Princeton students, the late Adlai E. Stevenson once declared: «What a man knows at fifty that he did not know at twenty boils down to something like this: the knowledge that he has acquired with age is not the knowledge of formulas... but of people, places, actions — a knowledge not gained... by words, but by touch, sight, sound, victories,
failures, sleeplessness, devotion, love — the
human experiences and emotions of this earth; and perhaps, too, a little faith and a little reverence
for the things you can not see.»
But the latter abound so that we can afford to overlook the innumerable
failures and self - deceptions that are mixed in with them (
for in everything
human failure is a matter of course), and we can also overlook the verbiage of a good deal of the mind - cure literature, some of which is so moonstruck with optimism and so vaguely expressed that an academically trained intellect finds it almost impossible to read it at all.
The Greene Turtle is not responsible
for interrupted or unavailable network server or other connections, miscommunications, computer transmissions or jumbled, scrambled or misdirected transmissions, or
for electrical, network, computer or mobile device hardware or software or program or application malfunctions,
failures or difficulties or
for other errors, omissions interruptions or deletions of any kind whether
human, mechanical or electronic or
for any damage to any person's computer or mobile device related to participating in the Turtle Rewards program.
if someone does nt respect or rather insults horribly a man who has worked 20 years
for the same brand with full dedication, he is just a
failure as a
human being in my eyes!
There is a
human element that can not be interpreted by a computer and there can be unintended consequences
for a deliberate plan of short - term
failure.