Sentences with phrase «for human males»

It is actually expected for human males and females to lose 1.5 and 2 inches in height respectively by age 70.

If you pee in the water and these little catfish are around, they can enter the human body, which is much worse for a human male than a human female.

Preference for human male body hair changes across the menstrual cycle and menopause.

Not exact matches

This is the root of sexual violence: The idea that women aren't autonomous human beings with the right and ability to say yes to sexual interactions we want and no to those we don't, but that we're receptacles for male sexual desire, that our bodies are up for grabs (literally, in this case).

So how do you go from that reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental then it must have been this ancient male diety named (fill in blank depending on religion) who loves me and knows me and cares for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer, not eating certain things, sabaath and many more just because he said so, even though we have no record of him saying anything, just records of humans who wrote things down that they claim he said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my beliefs on no other evidence than «it just can't be accident».

Even as a gay male, it was strange for me showering with my straight classmates or at the gym just as its strange for straight people in the same situation but I am a human being who is capable of respect for others privacy and personal boundaries.

The violence - prone masculine psyche drives us to racism, colonialism, imperialism and other types of oppression which are in fact extensions of the male - female pattern that lets us project the dark side of ourselves onto the other and so allows us to use / abuse other human beings for our own selfish ends.

In this sense we say things like, «it is in the nature of human beings» or «it is natural for human beings» to, for example, conceive and be conceived in male - female coitus, nurse their young, employ productive and practical reason, desire to know, live in walkable settlements, think in symbolic narrative, live well, etc..

We must ensure that our Catholic schools teach Catholic doctrine, and uphold Catholic values — including the values that might clash with current trends in British society: marriage as the lifelong union of a man and a woman, the need for human life to be cherished from conception to natural death, the truth about our sexual identity as male or female.

It is because there is a reason and purpose for the division of human nature into male and female in God's plan, which gives men and women different and complementary, but equally valuable, roles in the Mystery of Salvation.

We are made as human beings for Christ, according to Holloway; but even the fact of being male or being female was made for Him.

This dignity corresponds profoundly to the fact that the Creator willed (and continuallywills) the human person, male and female, for his or her own sake.

I believe that when we declare God to be exclusively male, we flirt with idolatry, for we re-create God in a human image.

... as you stated in another post «By inspiring the human authors to write what they did, God made it look like He was the one responsible for the actions of Israel, the destruction of the flood, the murder of the firstborn males of Israel, and the slaughter of Canaanite women and children.

The reasoning for this was to create a religion that biased a specific point of view, mostly in favor of the human male.

It is prepared to trust itself to one of the most notoriously unreliable features of human existence — not only the pain and riskiness of human gestation and childbirth, but also the whole of human skittishness about male honor, and the potential for violence that goes with female dependency.

Ted, our ancestors in Britain were at first barbarians, some of them cannibals whose relish for certain choice portions of human bodies, like well - cooked male buttocks and female breasts, is in the historic record, and it was Christian missionaries who saved our forebears from their savagery.

The new creation beckons us beyond the bored images and achievements of what we already are; it is a promise for the human, not just for the human as male or female.

We are to judge no longer by human standards — for example, claiming that women West Pointers or women clergy who operate just like their male counterparts represent a true victory.

It was not until the twentieth century that the equality the Declaration promised to all human beings — for that is what «men» meant in the fundamental phrase — began to be fully extended to females as well as males.

For centuries interpreters have explored and exploited this male language to articulate theology; to shape the contours and content of the church, synagogue and academy; and to instinct human beings — female and male — in who they are, what roles they should play, and how they should behave.

In my opinion, the only reason the male bastion of the clergy holds the scriptural position that it does is to protect the power base, a very human trait for a very human group, and quite unChirstian — but I'm just sayin»

By combining two Greek words for feminine and masculine traits, viz., thelis (female, fruitful, prolific, nourishing, tender, delicate) and arrhen (male, masculine, manly, strong), the word «thelarrheny» can be invented.3 Thelarrheny expresses the view that humans combine the traits (but not physical sex organs) of both female and male.

Such absolutisms included a heroic myth about U.S. history interpreted as the rise of «the successful male white Protestant, whose features were turned into ideals for the entire human race.»

Blankenhorn believes, for example, that he has found the «biochemical foundations» of the social form of marriage for humans in the female's lack of estrus, her «forward - tilting» vagina and her capacity for orgasm, and in the «unusually large» (by comparison with a gorilla) male penis — all destined to make heterosexual intercourse a more enticing project for humans.

Eberstadt presents a problem of human desire in both its male and female modes — perhaps even in a desire for the infinite.

- God, the Absolute - humanity, the human condition in its universal characteristics, - male and female, though different, equal in rights and dignity, - the cosmos, especially the planet earth available, with its limited resources, for all humanity - the planet's ecology as common essential source of life and hence of concern for all humans, present and future, - the human conscience guiding each one interiorly would be known only to each one personally, - the each group of humans has a history and a religio - cultural background of its own is a universal factor that makes for particularity and different contexts for theology, - the realization that the present increasing globalization of relationships, economy and culture impinge on theology and spirituality universally, though differently.

For centuries interpreters have explored and exploited this male language to articulate theology; to shape the contours and content of the church, synagogue and academy; and to instinct human beings — female and male — in who they are,...

Added to the reasons already given to show how homosexual acts violate the nuptial meaning of the body and the unity of the human person as a bodily being, respect for the health and life of homosexual males ought to make one realize that anal sex, the characteristic kind of homosexual male behavior, is morally bad.

souls is not male or female... read «Philoshophy of Divine Love» by Swami Prakashanand Saraswati... it is a wonderful book for those who really want to know who we are and why we are born as human....

The 10 percent claim goes back to Alfred Kinsey's 1948 book Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, in which it is stated that «10 percent of the males are more or less exclusively homosexual for at least three years between the ages of 16 and 55.»

So the male, who is not necessary for the virginal conception because he is superseded by God whose determining power he ministers in the sexual act, is therefore necessary for the procreation by which new human persons are created through the initiative of other men.

This is not right you are being misinformed or manipulated the Quran spoke of both $ exs from Angels will be serving in heavens is right but couldn't it be that female Angels are for male humans while male angels for female humans?

Muslims need to teach kids in schools love humanity and respect others, not if you are non muslim you are devil, you don't have to repeat it on tv or radio channels which religion is peacful, people are not dum they know all religions are for peace, but where is the peace in practically, showing hatred or having thoughts of islamization the world, stop evil thinking of conversion of anyone to islam that is not peaceful religion or thoughts.help the poor and needy, give equal respect to male and female respect democracy and more important develop tolerence.intolerence is the basic evil of human race.

With due respect for Father Neuhaus» human compassion, I submit that even if the priest were guilty of nothing more than harboring sexual lust in his heart toward a male or female of any age, the priest ought to have immediately recognized that he had not been given the gift of celibacy, and thus had badly misjudged his ability to keep his ordination vows.

We need to have a conversation that deepens our understanding of, and appreciation for, what being human is all about and that everybody, in my view, every single human being is a unique expression of the spectrum of both the masculine and feminine, because God is neither male nor female.

For an exercise involving a questionnnaire which elicits basic male / female attitudinal barriers, see Pfeiffer and Jones, A Handbook of Structured Experience for Human Relations Training (Iowa City: University Associates Press, 1971), VFor an exercise involving a questionnnaire which elicits basic male / female attitudinal barriers, see Pfeiffer and Jones, A Handbook of Structured Experience for Human Relations Training (Iowa City: University Associates Press, 1971), Vfor Human Relations Training (Iowa City: University Associates Press, 1971), Vol.

Similarly, the status of the human embryo, and the value placed upon it, have come under increasing scrutiny over the past decades, and even since DP in 2008 it has become increasingly normal to assume that it is morally acceptable to destroy embryos or to experiment upon them.12 The increasing sense of a loss of respect for human life in its earliest stages is linked to the abandonment of male - female lifelong marriage as the normal structure in which human life begins and is cherished.13 DP emphasises that «human procreation is a personal act of a husband and wife, which is not capable of substitution» (DP 16).

Feminist psychologists have identified the male biases that have distorted normal human development for women.

There is a determined attempt to impose gender theories in many countries — with attempts to change language or to castigate parents for bringing up children as male or female, as if the structures of language and grammar bore no necessary relation to human biology and were just a social construct of a patriarchal or «straight» society — and forgetting that «non-binary» language is itself a construct and an attempt to ideologically cleanse language to suit a particular theory.

«Have you not read that [God] who made [human beings] from the beginning made them male and female, and said, «For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh»?»

He also effectively denied a role for the feminine in the Church and in salvation when he developed an anthropology that took the male as the sum of what it means to be most fully human.

Contrary to popular opinion, the Catholic Church offers a rich and multidimensional understanding of what it means for humans to be male and female, far more complex than the unisex vision of many feminists.

For now, we can safely assert without fear of interpolation that the passage makes two claims: first, that all humans are made in the image of God, and second, that all humans are male or female.

So creation is perfected, fully good, when there is the human male and female, the man and the woman, Adam and the helper fit for him.

Also, although a Jew, he was beyond that, he was every race, the human race, the Adamic race, buried with Him and raised to the Christic race, where there is no Jew nor Gentile, male nor female, black nor white, yellow nor red, for all are One in Christ Jesus.

I do say that in creation the ideal for the fullness of human life is found in that union of the male and female toward which we are driven by our deep emotional need, driven by our intense physical desire, and driven by an inner sense of our incompleteness.

human beings, be it male or female seem to always blame one or the other for the demise of the relationship, i am 48 and am recently divorced.

You see, scientists have been slaving away for years with sweated brow to know why some human males are more monogamous than others.

And for millions of years male animals will kill babies that aren't theirs in order to mate with the mother... so since we want to imitate animals... is this normal behavior for humans also?