The Koobi Fora area is historically significant
for human origins research, most notably a hot spot for this discipline since the beginning of Drs. Richard and Meave Leakey's research in the 1960's and 70's.
Thus, many scientists had focused their search
for human origins on East Africa, especially Ethiopia, where Lucy was found, and Kenya.
DNA from the long - gone boy offers the best evidence yet
for human origins well before 200,000 years ago, evolutionary geneticists argued.
Not exact matches
«Thus, we see that one of the obvious
origins of
human disagreement lies in the use of noises
for words.»
77 % of American Jews believe evolution is the best explanation
for the
origins of
human life on earth.
There is still no explanation
for the spontaneous
origin of the universe, as well as the advanced cognition of the brain (chemicals and genetics reveal general trends, but no one knows how complete thoughts are actually formed, nor emotions or personalities); creation and the
human conscious, the two fundamental focuses of religion.
Religious Differences on the Question of Evolution (United States) Percentage who agree that evolution is the best explanation
for the
origin of
human life on earth Atheist / Agnostic 87 % Buddhist 81 % Hindu 80 % Secular unaffiliated 77 % Jewish 77 % Catholic 58 % Religious unaffiliated 55 % Orthodox 54 % Mainline Protestant 51 % Muslim 45 % Hist.
Most highly educated people who understand quantum physics and it's related fields realize that
humans might not ever be able to understand everything, including the
origins of the Universe, but it is
human nature to look
for it and to try to understand as much as we can about the universe and how everything interacts.
For if their purpose or activity is of
human origin, it will fail.
to Jake, in every era or times in the past,
humans have different perception of reality, because our knowledge improves or changes toward sophistication,
For example during the times of Jesus, there was no science yet as what we have today, since the religion in the past corresponds to their needs, it is true for them in the past, but today we already knew many new ideas and facts, so what is applicable in the past is no longer today, like religion, we have also to change to conform with todays knowledge.The creation or our origin for example is now explained beyond doubt by science as the big bang and evolution is the reason we become humans, is in contrast to creation in the bibles genesi
For example during the times of Jesus, there was no science yet as what we have today, since the religion in the past corresponds to their needs, it is true
for them in the past, but today we already knew many new ideas and facts, so what is applicable in the past is no longer today, like religion, we have also to change to conform with todays knowledge.The creation or our origin for example is now explained beyond doubt by science as the big bang and evolution is the reason we become humans, is in contrast to creation in the bibles genesi
for them in the past, but today we already knew many new ideas and facts, so what is applicable in the past is no longer today, like religion, we have also to change to conform with todays knowledge.The creation or our
origin for example is now explained beyond doubt by science as the big bang and evolution is the reason we become humans, is in contrast to creation in the bibles genesi
for example is now explained beyond doubt by science as the big bang and evolution is the reason we become
humans, is in contrast to creation in the bibles genesis,.
Whatever its
origin — and I myself agree with Wellhausen and others in attributing the identification to the primitive Christian community, as their least inadequate and only possible term
for one who was thus both
human and divine and yet not God (which would have been unthinkable in their realm of ideas)-- whatever its
origin, this first great step in the advance of Christology was of endless significance
for the later development of Christian doctrine, and it was of paramount importance
for the Gospel of Mark.
Whatever impulse his followers have had to labor
for the amelioration of
human life in ministering to the sick, the weak and helpless, the ignorant, the poverty - stricken, the imprisoned by any kind of chains, owes its primary
origin to the love of God
for persons as this was manifest in Jesus.
Thus,
for reasons quite different from those associated with the
origin and meaning of the western calendar, the year 2000 appears to mark a significant turning point in
human history.
For those of us who are comfortable with a theory of evolution that acknowledges the common
origin of the
human and animal kingdoms, the scientific evidence that corroborates this syndrome of dominance in the mythic Genesis accounts is of special interest.
That all of it is opinion based on the social evolution of
humans for the last 100,000 years as we have attempted to decipher our
origins with only our physical senses coupled with our internal emotions to go on.
The primary answer is that modernist thinking assumes the validity of Darwinian evolution, which explains the
origin of
humans and other living systems by an entirely mechanistic process that excludes in principle any role
for a Creator.
This is probably where
human art
for the sake of beauty has its
origins — like all primates we're pretty dull looking.
While I was reading Vorgrimler, the Congregation
for the Doctrine of the Faith issued its «Instruction on Respect
for Human Life in Its
Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation.
As a meditation on
human origins as somehow alien, Prometheus most closely compares to Brian De Palma's much maligned Mission to Mars, but in comparison to that movie the «engineers» in Prometheus have no care
for mere
human life or
for life on the planet earth as a whole.
Creation from nothing, the
origin of death among
humans, the murder of Abel by Cain, a cataclysmic flood of judgement, the righteous judgement of Sodom and Gomorrah, the Mosaic
origin of the Torah, manna from heaven, the reliability of Deuteronomy, the driving out of the Canaanites, Isaiah's authorship of the servant songs, and so on — it's almost as if Jesus and his followers went out of their way to validate all of the most awkward apologetic curveballs in the Old Testament just to make life difficult
for post-Enlightenment Western interpreters.
Our profession need not now agree on its
origin, significance, and value
for human happiness when we acknowledge that by itself it does not meet the requirements
for a psy disorder.
The movie leaves that quest open
for a franchise of never ending sequels as Dr. Shaw and David move on to find the deeper
origins of the importance of an individual
human life.
21
For prophecy never had its
origin in the
human will, but prophets, though
human, spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.
When
humans learned that the God of Israel was the fountain and
origin of all that is, and of all the stunning intelligibility within every part of creation, they had a motive
for dedicating their whole lives to unlocking the secrets hidden in creation.
Since not all personal conversions lead to fundamentalist views of the Bible, it would be preferable to emphasize a more universal tendency as the
origin of conservative zeal: the
human quest
for absolute certainty.
Only when true compassion and understanding
for your fellow
human regardless of their situation, beliefs or
origin will make the world a better place.
What's more, since the only designing intelligence that could have played a role in the
origin and history of life (including
human life) must have been nonhuman, my theory of design detection is irrelevant and misleading
for biology.
The universality of the
human regard
for those higher qualities which the Hebrew gathered up in the concept of righteousness found rational explanation best in a cosmic
origin which some modern thinkers describe as a Process; but,
for the Hebrew mind, that Process was personal.
Of course, it is possible to reply that the alleged stumbling block occurs every day according to Christian teaching, because what here in the case of the first
human being is felt to be contrary to the fundamental conceptions of metaphysics and the methodological basis of natural science, happens continually at the
origin of every individual
human soul, at the genesis of every single
human being,
for such souls equally with those of the first
human beings, are created by God directly out of nothing.
Thus no miracles, material or spiritual, are of
human origin,
for all are exclusively within God's domain and competence.
However, the late Fr Ernan McMullin argued that evolution calls
for a dramatic reinterpretation of the Genesis story of
human origins -LCB- The Tablet, Jan 2008).
[23] See Congregation
for the Doctrine of the Faith, Instruction on Respect
for Human Life in its
Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation (1987) 1,2: AAS 80 (1988); Catechism of the Catholic Church, no. 2274.
To me this appears the most satisfactory interpretation of the present state of Life on the surface of the earth; despite a regrettable recrudescence of racialism and nationalism which, impressive though it may be, and disastrous in its effect upon our private post-war lives, seems to have no scientific importance in the overall process:
for the reason that any
human tendency to fragmentation, regardless of its extent and
origin, is clearly of an order of magnitude inferior to the planetary forces (geographic, demographic, economic and psychic) whose constantly and naturally growing pressure must sooner or later compel us willy - nilly to unite in some form of
human whole organized on the basis of
human solidarity.
the doctrine of «evolutionism» in so far as it inquires into the
origin of the
human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter —
for the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God.»
For our survival and well - being, Wilson says, we need a consensus about our
origins, our nature as
human beings, our place in the natural world and our purpose, or what it is that makes life worth living.
We see the truly
human in Christ in the words spoken in the olive grove (cf. Lk 22, 42), and in the reminder to the apostles that if they loved him, they would put selfishness to one side, and would be glad that he was going to the Father, «
for the Father is greater than I» (Jn 14, 28), which is but to say that the Father is the source of my
origin and my joy.
Generis: «
For these reasons the Teaching Authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions, on the part of men experienced in both fields, take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter - for the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God» [italics adde
For these reasons the Teaching Authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of
human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions, on the part of men experienced in both fields, take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the
origin of the
human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter -
for the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God» [italics adde
for the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God» [italics added].
Whereas Whiteheadians can rightly be faulted
for failing to probe the sensibility that leads to acceptance of false philosophies and the historical and psychological
origins of this sensibility, deep ecologists can be faulted
for failing to provide practical proposals
for slowing and finally stopping the
human destruction of life - support systems without causing even worse evils.
Our profession need not now agree on its
origin, significance, and value
for human happiness when we acknowledge that by itself it does not meet the requirements
for a psyc disorder.
Human values waited
for millennia after the
origin of life before the fullness of time
for their concrete expression on this earth.
He emphasized the active, integrating self (rather than the frail, victimized ego); held to a «soft» (rather than a «hard») determinism; had a strong interest in future, goal - directed strivings (rather than
origins); emphasized the organism as a whole centered in the self (rather than a conflict view of personality); regarded the striving
for worth and power (rather than sexual striving) as the central dynamic in mental health and illness; emphasized the possibilities
for continuing change in the later years (rather than regarding the early years as utterly decisive)(2) It is clear from these motifs in Adler's thought that his vision of
human beings was positive and growth - centered.
Certainly one of the strongest and most evocative values undergirding the belief that a good society cares
for all its members is the religious conviction that each
human life has a sacred
origin and a sacred destiny.
The fact that the Christian passion
for humanity may resemble other forms of humanism which appear to owe nothing to specific Christian
origin or inspiration, and that humanists outside the Christian tradition can make a common commitment with Christians to enlarge and enhance the
human and humane, does not mean that these individuals» differing sources of humanism are to be treated deprecatingly or indifferently; Christians will see in those sources evidence of the radical freedom and the unpredictable activity of the Logos, to which the Fourth Gospel first gave witness.
The Vatican in its Instruction on Respect
for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation: Replies to Certain Questions of the Day offers an answer: the human being must be respected as a person from the first instance of his or her existence as a fertilized
Human Life in Its
Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation: Replies to Certain Questions of the Day offers an answer: the
human being must be respected as a person from the first instance of his or her existence as a fertilized
human being must be respected as a person from the first instance of his or her existence as a fertilized egg.
Yet in being the
origin of life and providing
for the possibility of life, God behaves in a way which is not dissimilar to that of a
human father.
I've read material on one site (the site has 5K + pages, of which I read less than 100) that uses Velikosky as part of the starting point
for a theory of the
origin of the universe, and subsequently
humans, that is congruent with Genesis, but also both explains and predicts things not found in that account.
The chapter on religion argues,
for example, that the cosmopolitan principles of common
origin of humanity, equality of
human beings, and universal solidarity can be found in all religious traditions.
The
origins of Europeans used to seem straightforward: The first modern
humans moved into Europe 42,000 to 45,000 years ago, perhaps occasionally meeting the Neandertals whose ancestors had inhabited Europe
for at least 400,000 years.
The child's transition from gesture to symbol could be a developmental model of the evolutionary pathway to
human language and thus evidence
for the «gestural
origins of
human language,» Greenfield said.
The chapter on
origins,
for example, takes a quick tour through the big bang, the formation of Earth, the history of the continents, the
origin of life, its evolutionary history, plus
human evolution — and all in less than 40 pages.