Not exact matches
«Such social doctrine provides directions but, with few exceptions (
for instance, the defense of
innocent human life), does not provide directives of immediate applicability to policy questions on which people of good faith, guided by reason and conscience, can come to different conclusions.»
The archbishop also asserted that laws are based upon certain principles: «the pursuit of the common good through respect
for the natural law, the dignity of the
human person, the inviolability of
innocent life from conception to natural death, the sanctity of marriage, justice
for the poor, protection of minors, and so on.»
But if we put that matter aside, and if our main interest lies in protecting the
lives of our people, why do the mavens on national security show no concern
for the 1.2 million
innocent human lives taken each year in abortion?
And while I'm grateful believers and unbelievers can agree that the taking of
innocent human life is wrong, without a basis
for this knowledge, this is a position can turn on a dime.
Innocent women burned at the stake, gays ridiculed and denied rights,
human beings turn themselves into
living bombs: all in the name of some «god», undefined, unproven, undistinguished but always worth killing
for.
8) The sentence of death may be improper if it has serious negative effects on society, such as miscarriages of justice, the increase of vindictiveness, or disrespect
for the value of
innocent human life.
The American ideal, as it increasingly came to be stated in the 19th century as a tensionless harmony of moral and religious idealism and the quest
for economic success, required a peculiarly
innocent conception of
human life.
God's covenant with Noah which asks fallen humanity to establish a society based on reverence
for life and a legal justice that protects the
innocent human beings from the murderer who is around; and God's call to Moses to liberate the Israelite people from Pharaoh's slavery; and God permitting monarchy with new perils of oligarchy to destroy the more
human Tribal Federation to liberate the Israelites from the technically superior Philistines in Palestine; and Paul's doctrine that the Roman State, which he knew had its role in crucifying Jesus.
«But
for citizens and elected officials alike, the basic principle is simple: We must begin with a commitment never to intentionally kill, or collude in the killing, of any
innocent human life, no matter how broken, unformed, disabled, or desperate that
life may seem.
No public official, especially one claiming to be a faithful and serious Catholic, can responsibly advocate
for or actively support direct attacks on
innocent human life.»
Lifton and Markusen are ever alert to pounce on the slightest suggestion of the use of impersonal technology
for the indiscriminate destruction of
innocent human life.
We have only to open our eyes, to understand how dearly we are loved by a creator who is not malevolent, who understands our
human condition, who despite our sad history continues to express faith, hope and love
for us by these daily decision to create
life in the form of
innocent children and then to entrust them to us.
Maybe it is the grindingly long, 162 - game season, which allows
for so many promising and disheartening plotlines to take shape, only to dissolve again along the way, and which sustains even the most improbable hope past any rational span; or maybe it is simply the course of the year's seasons, from early spring into mid-autumn — nature's perennial allegory of
human life, eloquent of
innocent confidence slowly transformed into wise resignation.
There's NO excuse
for taking
innocent human life of any kind; no matter what your perspective may be.
For this reason, Evans counsels Christians to avoid the «embryonic
life» narrative, which holds
innocent human life to be inviolable from conception to natural death, because invoking the value of unborn
life pushes people into pugilistic abortion - rights corners.
While we are to expect some collateral damage among the
human population, it is better that a few
innocent die than
for one FMD to
live free.
With nearly half of women saying they have returned to an abusive home out of concern
for a pet's safety, H.R. 909 is clearly necessary to save
lives and prevent more harm to
innocent human and animal victims.
My climate enemies have done scientific and other academic frauds; they've destroyed, withheld and pretended to misplace scientific data in order to prevent the
human race discovering things about nature; they've forged documents to frame people they don't like; mendaciously and publicly accused
innocent people of deplorable crimes that carry prison sentences; betrayed the trust reposed in their professions by fraudulently abrogating to themselves the magical competence to diagnose entire swathes of the (perfectly healthy) population with thought disorders just to score points in an academic bitch fight; deliberately and self - servingly lied to * massive * audiences about the way science itself works — than which I can't
for the
life of me think of a greater crime against humanity in the recent history of the developed world, can you Joe?
Any act of terrorism is a painful hit to any society and its
innocent members — it should always be strongly underlined that there is no justification
for targeting any
human's
life due to any form of extremism, and one must bear in mind that often it is not about the death itself, but to intimidate the nations in order
for them to become more vulnerable, and to limit widely understood
human rights as this kind of society, namely the threatened society, is much is easier to be governed.