Taking Caperton into account, most states have set their own standards
for judicial disqualification, with the considerations and contribution limits varying somewhat from state to state.
The legal test is thus one of reasonable apprehension which is the sole standard
for judicial disqualification in Canadian law.
The «reasonable apprehension of bias» test
for judicial disqualification has been a fixture of Canadian law for many years, at a minimum since its formulation in... [more]
Not exact matches
First,
for an impressive descriptive study of
judicial disqualification appeals from 1980 to 2007, see Sande L. Buhai, Federal Judicial Disqualification: A Behavioral and Quantitative Analysis
judicial disqualification appeals from 1980 to 2007, see Sande L. Buhai, Federal Judicial Disqualification: A Behavioral and Quantitative
disqualification appeals from 1980 to 2007, see Sande L. Buhai, Federal
Judicial Disqualification: A Behavioral and Quantitative Analysis
Judicial Disqualification: A Behavioral and Quantitative
Disqualification: A Behavioral and Quantitative Analysis, 90 Or.
For more on
disqualification motions, you'll want to read
Judicial Ethics Bench Guide: Answers to frequently Asked questions.
The dignity of the court, the judge's respect
for fulfillment of
judicial duties, and a proper concern
for the burdens that may be imposed upon the judge's colleagues require that a judge not use
disqualification to avoid cases that present difficult, controversial, or unpopular issues.