Not exact matches
Citizens acknowledge they haven't rediscovered savings
religion: in October, an Ipsos Reid poll
for RBC found that more than one - third of Canadians were saving
less than they had in the past, versus 19 % who claimed to be saving more.
For example, its members are
less likely to be affiliated with
religion and more likely to be politically independent.
Once I left
religion behind and embraced humanity I found myself
less judgmental, depression subsided when I realized I really wasn't in danger of burning in hell at the discretion of a God, and found that
for the most part people are good.
If all
religions would embrace the tenets and beliefs they share and focus
less on their differences they could pull together and work in harmony
for the good of those who are trapped in extreme poverty.
If it weren't
for religion, I bet we'd be a lot
less accepting of people's rights to brain - wash their children.
If my mission were to disprove
religion, would I really trust a religious person, even a janitor, to work
for me, much
less enter my building?
It would be my opinion that the LDS have stood
for bigotry no
less than any of the other major
religions.
A world without
religion would be one with much
less care shown
for fellow human beings.
Trust me, I've been discussing politics, and to a
lesser extent
religion online
for many years.
Only
religion presumes to label human characteristics as «sinful», making it impossible
for a bible botherer to ever feel «good enough», much
less worthy of love and respect.
A
religion that restricts lifestyle in a variety of other ways is
less likely to be a over
for drug use than a
religion that teaches only the duty to take drugs.
For Rorty, that dream is nothing
less than a
religion, of whom the chief apostles are Walt Whitman and John Dewey, and of which America is the New Jerusalem.
Forcing the case
for this kind of living moral alternative into the narrow confines of an argument that is just about
religion and liberty makes the treasure we seek to protect seem smaller and
less significant than it truly is.
He conveniently overlooks certain other considerations favorable to socialism; when these considerations are given their due, even some practical people unafflicted by the need
for a secular
religion will find the alleged superiority of capitalism something
less than obvious.
Fourth, although there is a fixed canon in most
religions, it is also true that there is often a body of supplementary literature which, while theoretically
less sacred, does nevertheless constitute a highly important source of direction
for faith and practice.
His warning in Science and the Modern World that metaphysics could not go far toward presenting an idea of God available
for religion is
less obviously relevant to the later formulations of the philosophical doctrine.
For those who are
less initiated, like the poor Japanese Christians, a
religion of outward practices is permissible, but that too tends of its nature towards an ever
less visible and more spiritual mode of being.
Every time I interact with a Muslim I am aware that his
religion considers me
less than human
for not sharing his beliefs.
The potential readership
for a serious and sustained discussion of
religion is no doubt much
less.
Black Protestants are more likely (47 %) to rely on
religion than in 2007 (43 %), and
less likely to look to common sense than
religion (41 %, compared to 47 %) when looking
for similar guidance.
Butler shows how in the early national period, as the line of distinction between
religion and the civil authorities («separation of church and state») developed and the citizenry relied ever
less on the government
for things spiritual or ecclesiastical, church life prospered.
For almost the last 3 millennia, man has been shackled to an outdated, antique, donkey - and - cart theology, worshiping a God that could care
less about
religion, and even
less about which denomination you belong to.
The whole article is little more than desperate christian rationalization - an attempt to stay pertinent in a world that has increasingly
less use
for religion.
Less familiar are two further aspects developed in his systematic theology: his understanding of the intuition of the infinite and his view of
religion as the struggle
for truth.
There are people who use
religion as a crutch, just as there are those who use
religion to accomplish wonderful things and make life better
for the
less fortunate as Jesus taught consistently throughout the Bible.
For me more God and
less religion is the answer.
and then they are excommunicated and the fight is over... this is a hopeless fight especially when
religion is involved... they either fight
for rights and lose it all (and essentially go to hell) or give in and listen to their religious leaders... I do not believe in what they do and could care
less really but they are in a no win situation and they as nuns should not be worried about birth control or anything of the such... they took the vows..
I cant speak much
for the other
Religions, but one can say the same about them as well... Buddhism
for example... while their temples can be seen as
less grandiose in the native locations, in the West they become Statements of what MAN can do to show - off, and not what man can do to seek the Divine.
As a culture we have accepted this (more or
less) and therefore it would not make sense to now add a holiday
for another
religion when these people have spent so much time and effort to remove all
religion from school.
«My
religion prevents me from hurting you
for your lack of belief in my hateful god, but you better watch out because (other,
less - cowardly religious people, angry jesus at judgment day, etc.) will get you!»
Here then is a second and
less obvious explanation
for America's capacity to generate a civil
religion — the opportunity and inclination of its government agencies to use religious symbols.
The detailed framework of Whitehead's philosophy is far
less known than his aphorisms,
for example: «Christianity has always been a
religion seeking a metaphysic ’28 — with the implication that it never rests in any one metaphysic, or philosophy.
Believe me, I have no great love
for the democrats, but when it comes to
religion they are definitely the
lesser of two evils.
The multiverse idea offers an explanation of why we find ourselves in a universe favorable to life that does not rely on the benevolence of a creator, and so if correct will leave still
less support
for religion.»
If morality as proclaimed by various
religions is denied a place at the policy table, then our nation will only be guided by those with a very cramped and limited moral view — which would have been a disaster
for abolition and civil rights way back then — and would be no
less a disaster today.
But at least an all inclusive school won't teach that your
religion is better than another person's, and therefore they are
lesser people
for it and
less worthy of life.
Someone said (para) that we are all athiests
for other
religions — real athiests just believe in one
less god.
Adherents of the new Christian sects, of which there were many competing ones, e.g., Ebonites, Gnostics, etc., would have been familiar with the Serapis and likely would not have wanted their godman to seem any
less impressive than the gods of the Serapis and other
religions of the time, so there would have been a need
for a miraculous birth story and other miracle stories
for their godman, as well.
It must be recognized that in this, not
less than in the concept of the covenant, there was profound ethical content which religious leaders were not slow to apply
for the vitalizing of the
religion of nation and individual, several of them commenting on the astonishing fact that Israel was a peculiar treasure of God.
For those who have had little exposure to anything but a specific religious tradition or a denominational faith, or a religionsaturated local or national culture, an introduction to world
religions and to cosmopolitan cultures makes certainties
less stable.
This is driven
less by personal religious conviction than by the need to amend the inevitable distortions that resulted from centuries of scholarship that failed to account seriously
for a phenomenon as massive as
religion.
To suggest, then, that religious believers (much
less majorities who, qua majorities, also have a second claim on shaping public policy) are «wards» depending on the Constitution
for their religious freedom and its scope is, to use Posner and Segall's words against them, «to turn the Constitution upside down when it comes to government and
religion.»
What a great showing of solidarity it would be
for him to align himself with the millions of women around the world who are living far far
less than equal lives in societies where male supremacist
religions are powerful.
If she only would use her
religion for more good and
less horrific evil and gay - bashing, maybe she would be a better person and we would have a better,
less divided world.
For him, a campaign to repeal 1701's Act of Settlement is
less about anachronistic oppression of Roman Catholics than about unravelling the constitution in favour of a prescriptive secular republic, devoid of
religion.
In a phone call last week, she said she got the idea
for her project after following my RN140 Twitter course (@sprothero), where I attempted to tweet each of the major
religions in 140 characters or
less.
Now that so much data is available to make the unexplained
less frightening... and that the historical record has shown that most church doctrine was made up and that even the Jesus birth story / son of god born of a woman etc etc has been recycled in numerous different
religions for over 4000 years... preaching Faith in a fairy tale is a losing proposition.
For example, when people say all
religions are «more or
less the same,» I worry that we're moving to a point where we fail to recognize the unique differences between world
religions and the things that distinguish the gospel of Jesus from other belief systems.
After years of participating in a comfortable faith tradition, many find themselves in a spiritual wilderness, feeling disillusioned with church, longing
for more freedom and
less religion in their lives.
But
religion would be
less open to the charge that it is an opiate if children were taught that salvation and happiness are the rewards
for doing good rather than
for not doing bad —
for obeying the «thou - shalts» of the Sermon on the Mount rather than the «thou - shalt - nots» of the 10 Commandments.