Sentences with phrase «for less talent»

They want more money for less talent.

Not exact matches

If there's «less competition» for their talents, Thornley can pay them less.

What's more, those that fear being «caught» may avoid taking risks that could reveal their perceived inadequacies, or they'll settle for less, not believing they deserve better than mediocre results, mediocre talent or average opportunities.

By contacting organizations that specialize in helping displaced financial staffers or executives, you might be able to hire top talent for less than top dollar.

Non-Jews wishing to become teachers and scientists and professional men are able to find more or less open opportunities for the exercise of their talents.

Sandberg told CNBC that A.I. can catch «99 percent» of the «bad actors» in some content areas, but internet watchdogs are less sure, and after a week that was the worst for Facebook shares since 2012 — and saw tens of billions in Facebook market capitalization erased daily — it seems like the «responsibility» of companies merits more spending on human talent.

«There's still more talent (engineers, execs)-- and resources (funding), but the costs and competition for talent and housing are extreme» in Silicon Valley, Mr. Doerr wrote in an email, suggesting perhaps that it may be a less attractive location than before.

Wall Street firms have been touting the selectivity of their programs for recruiting junior talent to counter worries that they're less attractive employers in the wake of the financial crisis.

Some investors find that they don't have the time, energy or talent to research and identify stocks for their portfolio, much less manage their money effectively.

-- You have a talent for seeking out the less traveled paths, hidden corners and beautiful places to stay wherever you travel.

Thank you for lending your culinary expertise to those of us with considerably less talent!

I believe Chucky can do «more with less» in terms of talent meaning, he can get a higher level of performance out of «less talented» players than he could from Diva's (for lack of better terminology)........

Menez looks a less risky option at the Express» reported fee of # 10.5 m, however, with the 28 - year - old more of a proven talent with consistent performances for club and country throughout his career, showing good goalscoring form in both the French and Italian leagues, with spells at AS Roma and AS Monaco as well as PSG and Milan.

Also: everyone screaming for veterans should remember that equivalent talent rookies get paid wayyyyy less and the Suns shouldn't break the bank for veterans to fill the roster who (A) Cost way more; and (B) Have zero chance to develop into more valuable assets (which mid 1sts do with some frequency).

I think the bust potential is just as high or higher for Ramsey and Bosa, (as I believe they are the only ones in the conversation for Dallas at 4)... or rather their impact to the team collective will be less, because of the overall talent imbalance between offense and defense.

Lukaku, Kane, Benteke for example have amassed their goal scoring rates at in the same time Giroud has been at Arsenal or less in teams with lesser creative talent.

Ozil is a luxury that Arsenal really can't afford.The only time he tends to shine is when the whole team is playing to the best of their ability... which is... as we know... not often enough.This being the case it would benefit the team to sell him to Barcelona for the reported # 50million and bring someone else in instead.Such a player would undoubtedly have less talent but in all liklihood would be able to perform on a more consistent basis.

Theo Walcott has been less than impressive un yet he is one of our heist paid players and will likely never be sold yet for all his supposed promise he still does not deliver the good that a 150 Grand a week player should, Danny Wellbeck has got us out of trouble on several occations but again his inate scoring talent is severely lacking and its telling that he was bought in without Wengers beady eye being on the deal and was offloaded by a club who should he have had any real promise would have charged us a far greater sum or point blank refused to sell him.

Finally Mr Wenger has 300 talent scouts scouring the globe, the sea floor and every planet in the milky way for 1 - 2 players who are as good as Messi Ronaldo and Naymar but who cost less than 5 mill and who will not disrupt cohesion.

The likes of Messi and Ronaldo both feature on Arsene Wenger's list, but instead the Gunners have had to settle for players with a lot less talent.

So for Wenger he has two choices — Waiting for the right opportunity when top players got pushed out or bench (Ozil, Sanchez, Cech)-- We gamble on a top young talent in lesser team (Aubameyang, Lacazette, Dybala, De Bruyne).

He doesn't particularly like being on the left wing, and if he has to be there, he much prefers linking up with Monreal than Gibbs, and there is much less need for him to fall back, as he likes doing with the new setup, so things weren't ideal for him to show off his talent.

Beal is between the two — significantly more talent than Otto but less than Wall, and also in the middle for «room to grow.»

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

For me, Xhaka is a lesser Wilshere, should not be playing instead of the guy who bleeds red and white and has actual talent for the EFor me, Xhaka is a lesser Wilshere, should not be playing instead of the guy who bleeds red and white and has actual talent for the Efor the EPL.

(Fans will still be able to watch him on TV most Saturday afternoons this fall, playing for national - power Alabama) This year the must - see talent is a little less defined.

Bendtner or Chamakh would still have been considered average even if they scored 25goals because they had average talent.For all the potential Bendtner had he never maximised it so as long asit wasn't developed he's still average.I mean it's possoble for an average player to score 25 goals when given the chances and possible for a world class striker to score less than that.Quality is a talent which may be linked to stats but does not necessarily show on stats.Take Ox for example, if you looked at his stats you might think he's average but he's not.Look at Lukaku, he's scored many goals for Everton yetmany people here think he's not gpod enough for Arsenal because they look at the quality and talent andnot just the goals.

In 8 years of time (when he is 29) he may well become a reliable defender for some club but at the moment he is showing less of a talent even than we bought him a few years ago.

Even at such a bargain price the investment made by Brendan Rodgers in January 2013 was still something of a gamble, though perhaps less so than subsequent deals for the likes of Mario Balotelli, and the Northern Irishman has done well to nurture Coutinho and show him enough faith to help the player mature into a real world - class talent.

Other people in the same line of work with less talent than me earned a lot for and personal honours.

Its difficult to develop players for the first team, these days with so many big money involve in teams, who demand success immediately, the days of nurturing talents are left to the lesser teams, while the big teams buy the finish product or the close to finish product.

Stabilizing the program doesn't count for much when you constantly blow winnable games, whether that means giving up leads, failing to capitalize, or losing to teams with less raw talent.

Ks - Gunner Poldi is his own worst enemy, he must decide weather to play for a «almost big» team or a lesser team, if its the later then he must go to Mid table or lower to get week and week out game but if he wants to stay and fight for us he must work harder, he has the talent but not the hart.

as a matter of fact it would be aimless and silly to one moment be putting ourselves out publicly to court talents like mbappe, lemar, asensio, only to backslide in favour of yesterdays man — for us to present our ambition this way is hardly progress and its less than fans deserve.

Having moved to England in 2011 as a raw talent, he is now more or less the finished article and surely deserves to play for a bigger team.

If it isn't ultra-surprising for a talent like Sano to succeed immediately, it's even less surprising for a 22 - year - old to have a rough introduction into the majors.

And later: «The dismaying suspicion is that Botham's problems have less to do with the waning of a titanic talent than the pressure he has created for himself by a flamboyant lifestyle and a restless urge to hit life for six.»

There's nothing wrong with investing in young talent.If you look at Chelsea's they've stocked buy some of Europe's brightest talent since there last title winning team but I do agree we should be looking at players who can break our starting eleven if we can't get them do we settle for less?

Buying all African talent (forgive my words) because they come for less salary is what we have done in recent past.

It's less common for players to sign early extensions, and generally only works when a team has a surplus of talent at a given position.

But Wright started recruiting more for fit and less on the raw talent that became available to him after the 2009 Final Four.

I champion has a few more questions than usual for this time of year, but no less talent.

Don't blame the process for the Sanchez situation, blame Wenger & Gazidis for not getting their business done earlier and / or not following through with the promises they have made to their high priced talent and their devoted fans... someone please give me an example of another supposed «top club» allowing their top player to go unsigned before the final year of their contract unless they were severely injured or the club was planning on selling said player prior to their final year... on a side note, Wenger might complain about the transfer window closing so late but just think about how problematic that could be for our team which usually waits until the last second to make deals... on the one hand we might have less «panic» buys, whereas on the other hand those same ridiculous purchases might just have come weeks earlier... Wenger will find excuses for his ineptitude in the transfer market regardless of the deadline date

Our academy has grown bad to worse and we do nt have supply of gifted talent, this year with less matches, we can invest in youth heavily for once

I really feel bad for Diaby, so much talent but just couldn't get going, and Flamini, well he done a good job in a few games for us on his return but I honestly don't have that much love for him, his return was more business coz we were desperate in that position... his return was mutually beneficial but never the less Thanks a lot guys and all the best in the future

If i recall exactly we had a whole argument over the valuation of Sterling, you refuted on numerous ocassions when i stated that Sterling would cost more than 35 million the point i made over 2 months ago and still make now and im sure most fans would agree is not that gnabry is better its just he is promising talent, and for the value City paid for Raheem (which is almost criminal considering Di Maria, cost PSG less) it would have been better to see Gnabry given a run out or sign someone actually worth 50 million

But this also gives top talent at lesser schools incentive to transfer if they think they have a legitimate shot at PT for a better school.

Voters for the USA Today Top 25 simply can't watch every game and they tend to be far less accurate in assessing talent than oddsmakers, which can create excellent early - season fade opportunities.

It was for ALOT less than $ 25m, Sevilla wanted him to sign a new contract after the year he had because he had so much talent and a lot of teams were interested.

For a lesser DC with lesser talent, this might be problematic.