Not exact matches
The consequences
of climate change are being felt not only in the environment, but in the entire socio - economic system and, as seen in the findings
of numerous reports already available, they will
impact first and foremost the poorest and weakest who, even if they are among the least responsible
for global warming, are the most vulnerable because they have
limited resources or live in areas at greater risk... Many
of the most vulnerable societies, already facing energy problems, rely upon agriculture, the very sector most likely to suffer from climatic shifts.»
Determining which types
of prevention to invest in (such as monitoring, early warning systems, and land - use
changes that reduce the
impact of heat and floods) depends on several factors, including health problems common to that particular area, vulnerable populations, the preventive health systems already in place, and the expected
impacts of climate change.275 Local capacity to adapt is very important; unfortunately the most vulnerable populations also frequently have
limited resources
for managing
climate - health risks.
Older people are at much higher risk
of dying during extreme heat events.136, 50,241,233 Pre-existing health conditions also make older adults susceptible to cardiac and respiratory
impacts of air pollution25 and to more severe consequences from infectious diseases; 257
limited mobility among older adults can also increase flood - related health risks.258 Limited resources and an already high burden of chronic health conditions, including heart disease, obesity, and diabetes, will place the poor at higher risk of health impacts from climate change than higher income groups.25, 50 Potential increases in food cost and limited availability of some foods will exacerbate current dietary inequalities and have significant health ramifications for the poorer segments of our populati
limited mobility among older adults can also increase flood - related health risks.258
Limited resources and an already high burden of chronic health conditions, including heart disease, obesity, and diabetes, will place the poor at higher risk of health impacts from climate change than higher income groups.25, 50 Potential increases in food cost and limited availability of some foods will exacerbate current dietary inequalities and have significant health ramifications for the poorer segments of our populati
Limited resources and an already high burden
of chronic health conditions, including heart disease, obesity, and diabetes, will place the poor at higher risk
of health
impacts from
climate change than higher income groups.25, 50 Potential increases in food cost and
limited availability of some foods will exacerbate current dietary inequalities and have significant health ramifications for the poorer segments of our populati
limited availability
of some foods will exacerbate current dietary inequalities and have significant health ramifications
for the poorer segments
of our population (Ch.
CCAMLR Members also must ensure that it has adequately accounted
for climate change impacts in all
of its decision - making, including when setting catch
limits for fisheries.
Now they're being used by the new
IMPACT2C project, which is looking to provide new estimates
for the
impact and economic cost
of climate change in Europe if global warming is
limited to the international goal
of no more than 2 degrees Celsius, relative to Western European pre-industrial levels.
Studies surveyed Millar, R. et al. (2017) Emission budgets and pathways consistent with
limiting warming to 1.5 C, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / ngeo3031 Matthews, H.D., et al. (2017) Estimating Carbon Budgets
for Ambitious
Climate Targets, Current Climate Change Reports, doi: 10.1007 / s40641 -017-0055-0 Goodwin, P., et al. (2018) Pathways to 1.5 C and 2C warming based on observational and geological constraints, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / s41561 -017-0054-8 Schurer, A.P., et al. (2018) Interpretations of the Paris climate target, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / s41561 -018-0086-8 Tokarska, K., and Gillett, N. (2018) Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5 C global warming, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0118-9 Millar, R., and Friedlingstein, P. (2018) The utility of the historical record for assessing the transient climate response to cumulative emissions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2016.0449 Lowe, J.A., and Bernie, D. (2018) The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2017.0263 Rogelj, J., et al. (2018) Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0091-3 Kriegler, E., et al. (2018) Pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C: A tale of turning around in no time, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.20
Climate Targets, Current
Climate Change Reports, doi: 10.1007 / s40641 -017-0055-0 Goodwin, P., et al. (2018) Pathways to 1.5 C and 2C warming based on observational and geological constraints, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / s41561 -017-0054-8 Schurer, A.P., et al. (2018) Interpretations of the Paris climate target, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / s41561 -018-0086-8 Tokarska, K., and Gillett, N. (2018) Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5 C global warming, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0118-9 Millar, R., and Friedlingstein, P. (2018) The utility of the historical record for assessing the transient climate response to cumulative emissions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2016.0449 Lowe, J.A., and Bernie, D. (2018) The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2017.0263 Rogelj, J., et al. (2018) Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0091-3 Kriegler, E., et al. (2018) Pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C: A tale of turning around in no time, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.20
Climate Change Reports, doi: 10.1007 / s40641 -017-0055-0 Goodwin, P., et al. (2018) Pathways to 1.5 C and 2C warming based on observational and geological constraints, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / s41561 -017-0054-8 Schurer, A.P., et al. (2018) Interpretations
of the Paris
climate target, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / s41561 -018-0086-8 Tokarska, K., and Gillett, N. (2018) Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5 C global warming, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0118-9 Millar, R., and Friedlingstein, P. (2018) The utility of the historical record for assessing the transient climate response to cumulative emissions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2016.0449 Lowe, J.A., and Bernie, D. (2018) The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2017.0263 Rogelj, J., et al. (2018) Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0091-3 Kriegler, E., et al. (2018) Pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C: A tale of turning around in no time, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.20
climate target, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / s41561 -018-0086-8 Tokarska, K., and Gillett, N. (2018) Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5 C global warming, Nature
Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0118-9 Millar, R., and Friedlingstein, P. (2018) The utility of the historical record for assessing the transient climate response to cumulative emissions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2016.0449 Lowe, J.A., and Bernie, D. (2018) The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2017.0263 Rogelj, J., et al. (2018) Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0091-3 Kriegler, E., et al. (2018) Pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C: A tale of turning around in no time, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.20
Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0118-9 Millar, R., and Friedlingstein, P. (2018) The utility
of the historical record
for assessing the transient
climate response to cumulative emissions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2016.0449 Lowe, J.A., and Bernie, D. (2018) The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2017.0263 Rogelj, J., et al. (2018) Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0091-3 Kriegler, E., et al. (2018) Pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C: A tale of turning around in no time, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.20
climate response to cumulative emissions, Philosophical Transactions
of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2016.0449 Lowe, J.A., and Bernie, D. (2018) The
impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and
climate response, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2017.0263 Rogelj, J., et al. (2018) Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0091-3 Kriegler, E., et al. (2018) Pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C: A tale of turning around in no time, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.20
climate response, Philosophical Transactions
of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2017.0263 Rogelj, J., et al. (2018) Scenarios towards
limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C, Nature
Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0091-3 Kriegler, E., et al. (2018) Pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C: A tale of turning around in no time, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.20
Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0091-3 Kriegler, E., et al. (2018) Pathways
limiting warming to 1.5 °C: A tale
of turning around in no time, Philosophical Transactions
of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2016.0457
In the judgment
of this report's authoring committee, the environmental, economic, and humanitarian risks posed by
climate change indicate a pressing need
for substantial action to
limit the magnitude
of climate change and to prepare
for adapting to its
impacts.
LONDON, 8 February, 2016 − Here is the big challenge: can 21st - century agriculture deliver the right levels
of nourishment
for nine billion people by the end
of the century, and at the same time protect nature, save on energy and soak up ever more carbon from the atmosphere to
limit the
impact of climate change?
The analysis by a team
of scientists − including from
Climate Analytics and the International Institute
for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) − who have published key research papers on the science,
impacts and policy aspects
of the 1.5 ˚C
limit is the centrepiece
of a collection
of content by Nature
Climate Change, Nature Geoscience and Nature journals, titled Targeting 1.5 °C.
• Improved understanding
of climate thresholds and vulnerabilities,
impacts, and adaptive responses in a variety
of different local contexts across the country • Improved understanding
of vulnerable populations (e.g., urban poor, native populations on tribal lands) that have
limited capacities
for responding to
climate change • Ways to build adaptive capacity that can be generalized across individuals, communities, and countries • Decision support tools
for entities responsible
for hazard mitigation and management • Collection
of socioeconomic research to inform
impact, vulnerability, and adaptation research
The scope and
impacts of climate change — including rising seas, more damaging extreme weather events, and severe ecological disruption — demand that we consider all possible options
for limiting heat - trapping gas emissions — including their respective costs and timelines
for implementation.
Calling
for «a comprehensive, proactive national planning and preparedness strategy
for limiting and adapting to the socioeconomic and environmental
impacts of climate change,» Climate Science Watch transmitted on September 4 a set of detailed recommendations to three Senate committee chairmen who have been developing climate and clean energy legis
climate change,»
Climate Science Watch transmitted on September 4 a set of detailed recommendations to three Senate committee chairmen who have been developing climate and clean energy legis
Climate Science Watch transmitted on September 4 a set
of detailed recommendations to three Senate committee chairmen who have been developing
climate and clean energy legis
climate and clean energy legislation.
Morocco - Global
climate negotiations concluded last week with renewed commitment to action on
limiting global temperature rise and preparing
for the
impacts of climate change.
IPCC Working Group II Contribution to AR5 The Working Group II contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report considers the vulnerability and exposure
of human and natural systems, the observed
impacts and future risks
of climate change, and the potential
for and
limits to adaptation.
The mission
of the Young Voices
for the Planet film series is to
limit the magnitude
of climate change and its
impacts by empowering children and youth, through uplifting and inspiring success stories, to take an essential role in informing their communities — and society at large, challenging decision - makers, and catalyzing
change.
«
Climate sensitivity estimates are greatly impacted by such variability especially when the observed record is used to try to place limits on equilibrium climate sensitivity [Otto et al., 2013], and simply using the ORAS - 4 estimates of OHC changes in the 2000s instead of those used by Otto... changes their computed equilibrium climate sensitivity from 2.0 °C to 2.5 °C, for in
Climate sensitivity estimates are greatly
impacted by such variability especially when the observed record is used to try to place
limits on equilibrium
climate sensitivity [Otto et al., 2013], and simply using the ORAS - 4 estimates of OHC changes in the 2000s instead of those used by Otto... changes their computed equilibrium climate sensitivity from 2.0 °C to 2.5 °C, for in
climate sensitivity [Otto et al., 2013], and simply using the ORAS - 4 estimates
of OHC
changes in the 2000s instead
of those used by Otto...
changes their computed equilibrium
climate sensitivity from 2.0 °C to 2.5 °C, for in
climate sensitivity from 2.0 °C to 2.5 °C,
for instance.
«
For the first time this Global Calculator shows that everyone in the world can prosper while
limiting global temperature rises to two degrees, preventing the most serious
impacts of climate change.»
While the United States does not have a comprehensive national plan
for mitigating
climate change or addressing GHG emissions, federal and state governments have developed a number
of regulatory programs designed to
limit the
climate impacts of energy generation and consumption.
Because the drivers
of climate change are truly global, even dedicated action at the regional scale has
limited prospects
for ameliorating regional - scale
impacts.
This summary
for policymakers
of the International Panel on
Climate Change Working Group III analitycal report outlines technological and behavioral changes that can limit the increase in global average temperatures to less than two degrees Celsius, the point at which science shows that climate impacts begin to overwhelm human coping e
Climate Change Working Group III analitycal report outlines technological and behavioral
changes that can
limit the increase in global average temperatures to less than two degrees Celsius, the point at which science shows that
climate impacts begin to overwhelm human coping e
climate impacts begin to overwhelm human coping efforts.
Fairbanks - area environmental activists say they're building on the momentum they generated two weeks ago during the local observance
of the global People's
Climate March.They're forming a local chapter of the national organization that headed - up the march to help lobby for limits on carbon emissions to reduce the impact of climate
Climate March.They're forming a local chapter
of the national organization that headed - up the march to help lobby
for limits on carbon emissions to reduce the
impact of climate climate change.
vulnerabilities
of particular populations with
limited resources
for coping with and adapting to
climate -
change impacts;
Sustainability pays off
for the entertainment industry
Climate change mitigation and
limiting the environmental
impacts of events is
of central importance
for the entertainment industry — not only
for the sake
of the environment, but also
for economic reasons: «In addition to the contribution to environmental protection, sustainability measures also have the potential
for enormous economic savings,» says Jens Michow, LEA - Chair and Head
of the German Federation
of the Event Industry.