Not exact matches
But
for all of the attention and
debate on the matter, we understand shockingly
little about just how much of the market is foreign - owned and what affect that has, particularly on house prices.
With every passing quarter, however, that behavior becomes less of a bogeyman and more of a painful reality — and the latest survey of cable subscriber numbers has a
little something
for both sides of that
debate.
The CMA's ruling comes amid a growing
debate on both sides of the Atlantic about the ethics of price hikes
for old off - patent medicines that are only made by a few firms and where there is
little competition.
Not so long ago, that was a question
for Wall Street analysts and venture capitalists to
debate among themselves, being of
little interest to anyone else.
This «fantasy speech» by Joe Oliver and the high likelihood that all political leaders will indulge themselves in a bit of «fact fantasy» suggests to us that there is a need
for an «official fact checker» to keep a
little bit of honesty in the political
debate.
Little - known comic Michelle Wolf becomes the latest surrogate
for partisan warfare, as her edgy White House Correspondents Association speech over the weekend continued to be
debated.
Conservative Leader Stephen Harper has made balanced budgets a key plank in the campaign
debate and his government's April budget left
little fiscal room
for other parties to promise significant new spending.
But it has been disappointing in that the kind of genetic variation it detects has turned out to explain surprisingly
little of the genetic links to most diseases... One issue of
debate among researchers is whether, despite the prospect of diminishing returns, to continue with the genomewide studies, which cost many millions of dollars apiece, or switch to a new approach like decoding the entire genomes of individual patients.The unexpected impasse also affects companies that offer personal genomic information and that had assumed they could inform customers of their genetic risk
for common diseases, based on researchers» discoveries...
I was going to post a comment but thought better of it... There is
little room here
for respectfull and educated discussion or
debate.
But it was a very unsatisfying attempt — to have weighty theological questions determined by delegates who came together
for a few days with
little prior study of the issues, who were sometimes inclined to suppose that such questions admitted of «yes» or «no» answers, and who passed judgment after rather limited opportunity
for discussion and
debate.
Without going into details here, there are too many assumptions in dating techniques used by evolutionists, but don't take my word
for it... just do a
little unbiased research on «flaws in dating techniques» and go through these sites just to get you started
for the major flaws in evolution that even evolutionists can not
debate.
i; m not sure i follow your
little brother thing, but sharing ideas and a conversation with two differing view points is a
debate, and if both parties don't try to kill the other one this is a world of understanding thru conflict,
for a differing point of view is in confliction with the others.
In sum, I guess I just want to plead
for a
little more recognition of the difficulty and complexity of both «sides» of this
debate among Christians.
I suspected I'd get a
little pushback from fellow Christians who hold a complementarian perspective on gender, (a position that requires women to submit to male leadership in the home and church, and often appeals to «biblical womanhood»
for support), but I had hoped — perhaps naively — that the book would generate a vigorous, healthy
debate about things like the Greco Roman household codes found in the epistles of Peter and Paul, about the meaning of the Hebrew word ezer or the Greek word
for deacon, about the Paul's line of argumentation in 1 Timothy 2 and 1 Corinthians 11, about our hermeneutical presuppositions and how they are influenced by our own culture, and about what we really mean when we talk about «biblical womanhood» — all issues I address quite seriously in the book, but which have yet to be engaged by complementarian critics.
This puts me in a more vulnerable position because 1) it exposes me to the criticisms of people on both sides of the
debate, 2) it could lead to serious disappointment, should I find that my intellectual integrity and my faith are indeed incompatible, and 3) it leaves me in the awkward position of being uncertain, undecided, and maybe even a
little confused
for a while.
Has Mr Blair forgotten his
debate with Christopher Hitchens about how (
little) religion is a force
for good in the world?!
i've been doing free stuff
for years on nakedpastor, giving people free cartoons and writing and creating a space
for debate, etc... but this other
little project i've initiated does require a membership fee.
Imagining God in this
debate is a
little much
for me.
If nothing else... this new book by Wright solves very
little, and the
debate will continue
for quite some time!
As
for the predictions of my hypothesis on the existence of God; that is a
little outside the scope of what I desire to
debate here on David's site.
I'm just a
little caught off guard because I thought that this
debate had been dead
for at least 5 years.
It's a
little silly that the poster picture
for this article about gun control shows a plain ol' pistol, when the
debate (currently) is about military - style assault weapons.
Ethical issues were not discussed in my childhood home, life's answers were considered to be clear and self - evident, leaving
little room
for discussion, much less
for debate.
As I thought about how to apply these teachings practically, a lot of strategies came to mind — putting the needs of others before my own, buying less and giving more, humbling myself when engaged in political or theological
debates, embracing rather than complaining about those «one - way relationships,» praying
for others more sincerely, saying «yes» a
little more often, working on that ubiquitous sense of entitlement and pride that keeps me from going the extra mile.
The bad news is that the revisionists pay
little attention to the religious - liberty dimension of the Maryland founding, and undervalue its importance as a breakthrough in religious tolerance with implications
for Catholic participation in the subsequent church / state
debate in the independent United States.
Oh some claim it on an anonymous forum, and others claim it publicly
for the sensationalism and notoriety, to spur
debate, I'm talking about deep down, that
little girl or boy in you, in your heart, you can't honestly say, I know there is no God.
His tool kit
for faith is
little more than a set of talking points
for debating Hitchens.
Or u just one of them annoying
little trolls online... its a
debate website
for Articles to be discussed wrong or right.
There is
little doubt that the
debate among Arsenal fans over Arsene Wenger being given another contract extension will rumble on, and surely flare up again after the first sign of trouble next season, but
for now it has died down to a minimum with Arsenal fans simply hoping that the Arsenal board has made the right decision.
Besides, Petrino's record at the collegiate level (75 - 26) leaves
little of what he does or doesn't do as a football coach up
for debate.
But
for those of you who can perhaps broaden this out a
little and see what title winning teams around Europe have been doing
for the past 5 seasons, and also acknowledge the shift in emphasis with many teams relying more now on goal - scoring potency from wide forwards, wingers, second strikers and attacking midfielders then I think the
debate is a
little more subtle than the «cut and paste a # 40M «guaranteed 25 goal» centre forward with no possible downside» proposition.
Although there is
little debate about who should be Arsenal's number one next season, with Petr Cech seemingly having that in the bag
for sure.
The NBA Internet began on message boards and in forums where people who cared about the minutiae of the sport gathered to form communities and
debate the topics of the day in a media landscape that cared
little for such conversations.
-LCB- And while it's totally a personal decision, and I have NO interest in «
debating» the issue, I do want to pass on an informative
little note about breastfeeding and alcohol
for those of you who have shared with me your concern. -RCB-
It's free
for IOS and iPad as well as
for Android devices and it's probably geared towards those kids with a
little bit more coordination and I mean there's obviously the whole
debate you will always get into when we talk about these things of you know should kids even be playing and how young should they be playing and I'd say this is appropriate
for what you think your kid is appropriate to be playing and if they has some coordination you'll probably do it.
Now, after two pregnancies filled with vomiting and heartburn, two natural births, and two
little humans that test my sanity and tolerance (both
for... Continue reading The Third Child
Debate
MPs have to be in Westminster
for crucial votes on the orders of their whips, but there is
little time spent in serious policy
debate in the chamber.
In particular, the group's applaud the six - to - one match
for donations up to $ 250, restrictions on public funds
for candidates who face
little opposition and the requirement that participants in the program commit to a public
debate, among others.
The Times picks up the Rockefeller Drug Law
debate in the AG's race and finds «
little evidence» that Nassau County DA Kathleen Rice voiced support
for reforms
debated in Albany last year.
The Democratic primary election
for Buffalo Mayor is Tuesday and the tension in the race seemed to make Wednesday night's
debate in the WNED WBFO studio a
little angrier.
In the lively
debate that concluded the conference, there was
little disagreement between young delegates and senior dignitaries about the urgent need
for re-charting Pakistan's political course so as to realise the long - cherished aspirations of its people.
The Times calls Paterson's push
for a so - called pardon panel «brave — and startling,» adding: «(the governor has) shown courage and common sense at a time when the national
debate about immigration shows
little of either.»
Just as the narrative about Labour causing the recession became fact, with all the contenders claiming they got it wrong on immigration there is
little room
for any
debate.
The need
for affordable housing was addressed in both segments of the
debate, with Republicans charging that the incumbents and their board had done
little, and the Democrats refuting that and saying that, historically, it has been solely Democratic boards that have created affordable housing.
TechPresident's Micah Sifry was a
little skeptical of how transformative the
debate format will be, since citizens have been asking questions of candidates in townhall - style
debates for years, but the organizers believe that opening the process up to more people than just those selected to be in a single auditorium WILL make a significant difference.
While the controversial gas drilling practice has been the subject of fierce
debate in New York
for years it has drawn
little attention in Massachusetts.
Tolbert and Howard waged the fiercest of this year's three countywide contests, despite
little or no direct confrontation after the incumbent shunned most invitations
for debates or candidate forums.
Conservative commentator Ann Coulter late Sunday weighed into the
debate over Republican presidential candidate Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpGOP lawmakers want Trump to stop bashing Congress US ends aid
for northwest Syria: report FBI informant met with three Trump campaign advisers: report MORE's increasingly physical campaign events, calling
for «a
little more violence.»
Each June, the last scheduled month of the annual legislative sessions, such bills pop up
for quick floor votes with
little debate or public review.
DeLauro, D - 3rd District, has become a leading opponent of the president's plans
for the Trans - Pacific Partnership, or TPP, objecting to plans to «ram the trade agreement through Congress with
little debate or transparency,» and saying it would destroy American jobs and threaten food safety and environmental regulations.