As a pejorative
for majoritarianism, it is akin to the Latin phrase mobile vulgus meaning «the fickle crowd», from which the English term «mob» was originally derived in the 1680s.
Not exact matches
In any case, the argument against Christian
majoritarianism influencing public policy rests more on respect
for minority feelings than on the alleged disintegration of the majority.
But, then, the dirty little secret is exposed: non-religion (or secular humanism, as Torcaso v. Watkins admitted) is just as much a religion as any other, except that by pretending to not be a religion, it becomes the Constitutionally established faith and religious test, not just
for public office but anything public (public policy, the public square), whose content is defined by the clerisy of a five justice «theocratic
majoritarianism.»
On top of this, we are overturning many of the rules and conventions of our parliamentary democracy, which should encourage the search
for consensus and compromise, and shun
majoritarianism.
While the former advocated a weak confederation that would insulate the North against southern administrative hegemony, the southern bloc fought
for a strong federal government with checks against
majoritarianism, allowing
for control of the national bureaucracy without falling victim to the North's larger population.
There was also is evidence that the norms of adversarial
majoritarianism associated with Westminster politics imbued the behaviour of those within the Coalition, illustrated by the way that the Liberal Democrats withdrew support
for boundary support in retaliation
for the collapse of the House of Lords Reform Bill in 2012.