@DA All sarcasm aside, democrats do frequently go
for military spending cuts, which is resisting national defence.
He added that he «looked very seriously» at a veto, but his support
for the military spending levels «overrode» his concerns about the bill.
Not exact matches
«A large debt also can compromise a country's national security by constraining
military spending in times of international crisis or by limiting its ability to prepare
for such a crisis.»
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and
military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential
for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences
for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals
for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand
for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price
for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24)
spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate
for our additional capital needs or
for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions
for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
The president's
spending blueprint cuts $ 54 billion from the Environmental Protection Agency, the State Department, and NASA, among others, to pay
for a massive
military buildup.
Laingen started the network in 2004, while working
for Minnesota Wire, a small manufacturing company that realized that high - tech entrepreneurs needed some way to band together and tap into the rich vein of
military spending.
Awate
spent the better part of the next decade performing unpaid labour, much of it
for the
military.
It would significantly boost
military spending and increase funding
for border security, infrastructure and efforts to fight the opioid epidemic.
Norway has increased
military spending by 9.4 %
for 2016.
The president said he approved the legislation to fund the government through September
for national security reasons, as it authorizes a major increase in
military spending that he supports.
He'd like to increase
military spending, sign free trade deals with other Asian countries, make it easier
for companies to hire and fire workers, change immigration laws, get more women in the labour force and much more.
WASHINGTON (Reuters)- U.S. President Donald Trump's push
for a major
military buildup suffered a setback on Thursday when the House of Representatives put plans on hold to fully fund the federal government through next Sept. 30 and instead resorted to temporary measures freezing
spending at current levels.
The outside world needs to apply a different kind of pressure: a diplomatic and economic push
for regime - led reforms, commercial investment, and reduced
military spending.
A note: the majority of data in the Factbook is
for 2005, and the lower the
military spending as a percentage of GDP the better the score in that category.
The RAND report estimated that if transition - related services were extended to active - duty personnel, the
military's healthcare costs would increase by between $ 2.4 million and $ 8.4 million a year — at most a 0.13 % increase over the $ 6.2 billion the Defense Department
spent on healthcare
for active - duty personnel.
President Donald Trump has said he plans to pay
for billions of dollars more
for the
military by cutting
spending on domestic agencies and departments.
According to 2016 estimates gathered by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, the United States was responsible
for 36 % of the entire world's
military spending.
Even so, President Trump is calling
for a $ 54 billion increase in US
military spending which he says is needed to «rebuild the
military.»
Trump's budget also calls
for what the President deemed a «historic» increase in
military spending, amounting to an additional $ 52 billion allocation
for the Department of Defense.
«Now, [funding
for robotics] is not dependent on the
military Department of Defense
spending,» Bignall added.
While the House recently approved defense
spending of $ 621.5 billion and the Senate approved $ 632 billion
for 2018, a 2011 budget law caps
military and defense
spending at $ 549 billion.
If you're looking
for military spouse jobs that can help support your family, chances are you're already on the hunt to
spend your family's earnings wisely.
The U.S. media somehow neglect to mention that the U.S. Government is
spending hundreds of billions of dollars abroad not only in the Near East
for direct combat, but to build enormous
military bases to encircle the rest of the world, to install radar systems, guided missile systems and other forms of
military coercion, including the color revolutions that have been funded and are still being funded all around the former Soviet Union.
But after the Korean War broke out, U.S. overseas
military spending accounted
for the entire payments deficit during the 1950s and «60s and early «70s, while private - sector trade and investment were exactly in balance.
The top five biggest spenders were the United States, China, Saudi Arabia, Russia and India, which accounted
for 60 percent of global
military spending.
The IMF
for its part vetoed cutbacks in Greek
military spending (far above the 2 % of GDP demanded by NATO), despite even the European Central Bank (ECB) and German Chancellor Merkel agreeing to this.
David Stockman discusses how the Deep State propaganda is used
for endless
military spending that is in large part responsible
for bankrupting the Anglo - American empire.
And that doesn't even factor in the economic activity generated by a $ 61 billion hike in
military spending — 14 new Navy ships, 90 airplanes, dozens of helicopters, and pay raises
for all
military personnel.
Who supported JFK, LBJ, and pushed
for Medicare, Medicaid, expansions to social security, Aid
for Families with Dependent Children (i.e welfare), opposed
military spending, etc..
And
for all you saying that this is voluntary you have never
spent any time in the
military or if you have you
spent it with hands over eyes.
The NUCLEAR «stick» is the Big Deterrence and thousand of «mini drones» can be used to «secure and hold» an area while our people stay home and run the show
for about 1 % of what we
spend on a useless «
Military Presence».
Paul's budget cuts
spending for basic (not relating to current
military operations)
military spending by 50 billion dollars and cuts a further 20 billion
for military modernization.
By the time of the Maccabees,
for example, the practice of keeping the Sabbath was so central to Judaism that, according to Josephus, the Romans had to exempt the Jews from
military service because they were useless as soldiers on the Sabbath.12 Seneca could not understand the Sabbath exercise and chided the Jews
for spending every seventh day of their lives in idleness.13
Obviously we don't need full scale wars to get the target... but if paying
for a tank you can't afford is what you want then lets keep buying tanks... Bush was able to double our debt in his 8 years primarily due to crazy
military spending, and Obama isn't doing very well either.
A recent comparative study of worldwide
military and social
spending indicated how at present 1.3 million dollars per minute on average are
spent for military purposes; during the same minute 30 children die
for lack of food or simple vaccines (WMSE).
On May 1, 2007, the Center
for Economic and Policy Research released a series of estimates on «the economic impact of the Iraq war and higher
military spending.»
Equally alarming, it is virtually impossible
for a member of Congress or an ordinary citizen to obtain even a modest handle on the actual size of
military spending or its impact on the structure and functioning of our economic system.
What it never reveals is that total
military spending is actually many times larger than the official appropriation
for the Defense Department.
Two months before the presidential election of 2000, the PNAC unipolarists issued a position paper titled «Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources
for a New Century» that spelled out the particulars of a global empire strategy: repudiate the ABM treaty, build a global missile defense system, increase defense
spending by $ 20 billion per year to 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, and reinvent the U.S.
military to meet expanded obligations throughout the world.
Totally have to agree with this comment about
military spending especially on federal retirements
for military and civil servants.
«They're talking about cutting bed nets
for malaria and leaving every piece of
military spending untouched,» said the Rev. Jim Wallis, who leads the Christian group Sojourners, referring to Republican
spending proposals
for the rest of this year.
As
for cutting
military spending, apparently the good reverend missed the news flash, WE ARE AT WAR.
Spurious biblical warrant was quoted
for increased
military spending and the development of American nuclear capability.
He actually
spent 27 years in the
military, ergo giving me a special respect
for the Armed Forces and a strange but natural patriotism long before the Gulf War and Lee Greenwood's «Proud To Be An American.»
He actually
spent 27 years in the
military, ergo giving me a special respect
for the Armed Forces and a strange but natural patriotism long...
Gordimer calls
for more money to develop a vaccine,
for Third World debt relief, and
for less
military and more public health
spending within Africa.
I will
spent my savings
for buying plendid
Military Pocket Skirt in Olive.
Noting the connection between childhood hunger and obesity and impaired
military recruitment, the US House of Representatives voted in favor of an amendment to a
military spending bill expressing support
for adequate funding
for the reauthorization of the Child Nutrition Act.
Marisel Pacheco, whose husband
spent 10 years in the Marines, said the event was a great thing
for military families.
Military discount plus FREE shipping over $ 35 Flip diaper covers starting at $ 9.99 GroVia swim diapers starting at $ 10.50 MILK MADNESS MONDAY: Each Monday you can type MILKMADNESS in your order notes and all orders that end in an EVEN order # will receive an extra point per dollar
spent — that means DOUBLE points
for Coach, TRIPLE points
for First Class, and QUAD points
for the MHC.