Sentences with phrase «for misleading label»

Not exact matches

Putting a common label on mental anguish is necessary for medical treatment, but is misleading if we expect the label to reveal the true «nature» of the experience.

The CHOICE investigation follows on from last week's decision by the Australian Consumer and Competition Commission (ACCC) to fine Smith's and Unilever for misleading «school canteen approved» food labelling.

The Campaign's work includes the Together We Rise therapeutic and social baking initiative, lobbying for an Honest Crust Act to protect shoppers from incomplete and misleading labelling and marketing, No Loaf Lost surplus slicing guide for small bakeries, the annual Sourdough September awareness drive, The Real Bread Finder map and Real Bread Loaf Mark.

The EDA says that the proposed labels would give misleading information to consumers, and thus is not suitable for dairy products.

For many reasons, such as there being over 10 million hens kept in conventional cages, false and misleading claims about egg - labelling and many others, AFSA is concerned for the future of genuine free - range systems for raising poultry on farFor many reasons, such as there being over 10 million hens kept in conventional cages, false and misleading claims about egg - labelling and many others, AFSA is concerned for the future of genuine free - range systems for raising poultry on farfor the future of genuine free - range systems for raising poultry on farfor raising poultry on farms.

Findings suggest that labels and advertisements for sham fruit foods mislead children with regard to the food's real fruit content.

The ACCC alleges that labels on these par baked products stating «Baked Today, Sold Today» and in some cases «Freshly Baked In - Store», and nearby prominent signs stating «Freshly Baked» or «Baked Fresh», were likely to mislead consumers into thinking that the bread was prepared from scratch in Coles» in - house bakeries on the day it was offered for sale and that it was entirely baked on the day it was offered for sale.

«Unfortunately, consumer affairs ministers today voted to lock - in misleading free - range egg labels, and that is why we are calling for consumers to boycott these products,» Mr Godfrey said.

IBFAN is not calling for Nestlé to stop selling breastmilk substitutes, but to abide by the rules adopted by the UN World Health Assembly, to stop misleading families and to provide parents who do use formula with correct information on labels.

At that time we used the language in the General Labelling Directive 2000 / 13 / EC on labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs for sale to the ultimate consumer Article 2 (1) of which stated that: «The labelling and methods used must not: (a) be such as could mislead the purchaser to a material degree, particularly: (iii) by suggesting that the foodstuff possesses special characteristics when in fact all similar foodstuffs possess such characteristicLabelling Directive 2000 / 13 / EC on labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs for sale to the ultimate consumer Article 2 (1) of which stated that: «The labelling and methods used must not: (a) be such as could mislead the purchaser to a material degree, particularly: (iii) by suggesting that the foodstuff possesses special characteristics when in fact all similar foodstuffs possess such characteristiclabelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs for sale to the ultimate consumer Article 2 (1) of which stated that: «The labelling and methods used must not: (a) be such as could mislead the purchaser to a material degree, particularly: (iii) by suggesting that the foodstuff possesses special characteristics when in fact all similar foodstuffs possess such characteristiclabelling and methods used must not: (a) be such as could mislead the purchaser to a material degree, particularly: (iii) by suggesting that the foodstuff possesses special characteristics when in fact all similar foodstuffs possess such characteristics.»

Health Canada should decide if these ingredients should be in all formulas to eliminate the false and misleading claims for these additives and the highlighting of these additives on labels in the promotions by the formula industries.

«This is very misleading for consumers and parents who rely on labels to help them buy products they want for their child.»

We will continue our fight for an honest, fair and simple label which supports our hard working British farmers and ensures the British public is not misled.»

Furthermore, the manufacturer is solely responsible for ensuring that its products» information labels are «truthful and not misleading.»

Be on alert for agave labeled this way to purposely mislead and deceive.

Legislation requires us to show RDIs for adults on the label, not kids so it can be a little misleading.

While this error in the booklet has been known for years it has not stopped companies that sell ionic silver labeled as Colloidal Silver from misleading the buying public with statements such as Professor Ronald J Gibbs informs us that all of the highest quality colloidal silver products are colorless.

The analysis also sparked calls for changes to guidelines on the amount of sugar which can be added to food in Britain, as well as clearer labelling on products, to avoid shoppers being «misled» by items billed as healthy alternatives to products containing normal levels of fat.

This fine print will always have a clause that says you are a mere tenant farmer of your books, and not their owner, and your right to carry around your «purchases» (which are really conditional licenses, despite misleading buttons labelled with words like «Buy this with one click» — I suppose «Conditionally license this with one click» is deemed too cumbersome for a button) can be revoked without notice or explanation (or, notably, refund) at any time.

The frontpage for the conference website makes a number of misleading or false statements, but one phrase that caught my eye was «The scientists speaking at this conference...» This list of speakers contains so few actual scientists (and even fewer climate scientists) that labeling the speakers as «scientists» is misleading.

With so few scientists and climate scientists, it's misleading for the ICCC to be labeling the speakers as scientists on the conference website's frontpage.

The LCBO puts out a simplistic label guide [PDF] for producers that, among other things, says «Vignette and product name are optional but must not be misleading or imply irresponsible use of product.»

There are grounds for lawsuits based on negligence, failing to monitor the safety of a prescription medication, misleading consumers of the risks of a medication, inadequately labeling a prescription medication and ignoring potential risks of a prescription medication.

Competition Bureau, Ensuring Truth in Advertising, Misleading Advertising and Labelling: «The misleading advertising and labelling provisions enforced by the Competition Bureau prohibit making any deceptive representations for the purpose of promoting a product or a business interest, and encourage the provision of sufficient information to allow consumers to make informeMisleading Advertising and Labelling: «The misleading advertising and labelling provisions enforced by the Competition Bureau prohibit making any deceptive representations for the purpose of promoting a product or a business interest, and encourage the provision of sufficient information to allow consumers to make informedLabelling: «The misleading advertising and labelling provisions enforced by the Competition Bureau prohibit making any deceptive representations for the purpose of promoting a product or a business interest, and encourage the provision of sufficient information to allow consumers to make informemisleading advertising and labelling provisions enforced by the Competition Bureau prohibit making any deceptive representations for the purpose of promoting a product or a business interest, and encourage the provision of sufficient information to allow consumers to make informedlabelling provisions enforced by the Competition Bureau prohibit making any deceptive representations for the purpose of promoting a product or a business interest, and encourage the provision of sufficient information to allow consumers to make informed choices.

Dismissal secured in a federal class action for a global confectionery company in the federal court involving state consumer protection laws and product labeling, alleging certain of the company's gum and hard candy labeling was misleading.

In particular, it does this by deterring mutually beneficial transactions (for example, purchases of Roundup that would occur absent misleading labeling about cancer risks), generating suboptimal transactions (for example, purchases of inferior substitutes to Roundup due to misleading Roundup labeling), and distorting competition within the marketplace (the reallocation of market shares among Roundup and substitutes not subject to labeling).