Sentences with phrase «for model comparisons»

What is the purpose of including all emission scenarios for model comparisons?

For our model comparison we use the same eight factors in the US market as we use in our previously published research.

The second - order Akaike information criterion for this dataset and model is 604.1, a criterion useful for model comparison (iv).

Not exact matches

Tortuga also offers a few other models in different sizes, so if you're looking for something smaller, you might want to check the backpack comparison page.

The SMART Box is a first - of - its - kind model pricing disclosure and comparison tool launched by the ILPA in partnership with the Association for Enterprise Opportunity (AEO), the leading advocate for microbusiness in the United States.

Low - adiabat rugby hohlraum experiments on the National Ignition Facility: Comparison with high - flux modeling and the potential for gas - wall interpenetration

A: As described in more detail in «Equity Compensation Analysis,» our analysis does not include a burn rate comparison or an absolute limit on total potential dilution; the display of «burn rate» and «run rate» in our analyses is for informational purposes and does not affect the scoring in our quantitative model.

- retirement savings and income - Pre-59 1/2 72t Calculations (avoiding penalty tax)- college savings and 529 plan illustrations - college cost and tuition data - Coverdell education savings - risk profile questionnaires and quizes - model portfolio illustrations - asset allocation and portfolio optimization - portfolio management and value tracking - 401 (k) retirement savings - Cost of waiting to save - Effect of Taxes and Inflation - Estate Tax Estimator - Finding Money for your savings goals - Health Savings Account (HSA) illustrations - Historical Hypothetical Portfolio Performance - Impact of Inflation - Life Insurance Needs Analysis - IRA Eligibility (all types of IRAs)- IRA Savings and Goal Analysis - IRA Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs)- IRA to Roth Conversion - Long Term Care Insurance - Lumpsum Distributions vs. Rollover Distributions - Model Portfolio Creation and Comparisons - Mortgage Amortization - Net Unrealized Appreciation of Employer Stock - Net Worth Estimator - New Value Calculator - Pension / Defined Benefit Income estimates - Portfolio Allocation Rebalancing - Portfolio Optimization and «Advice» - Portfolio Return Calculations - Paycheck Tax Savings - Required Minimum Distribution calculations - Retirement Budget and Expense Planning - Retirement Income Analyzer - Retirement Savings Estimator - Risk Tolerance Profile - Roth 401k - Roth Conversion - Roth v. IRA illustrations - Short Term Savings goals - Social Security benefit estimates - Stretch IRA / Legacy IRA illustrations - Tax Free Yield calculamodel portfolio illustrations - asset allocation and portfolio optimization - portfolio management and value tracking - 401 (k) retirement savings - Cost of waiting to save - Effect of Taxes and Inflation - Estate Tax Estimator - Finding Money for your savings goals - Health Savings Account (HSA) illustrations - Historical Hypothetical Portfolio Performance - Impact of Inflation - Life Insurance Needs Analysis - IRA Eligibility (all types of IRAs)- IRA Savings and Goal Analysis - IRA Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs)- IRA to Roth Conversion - Long Term Care Insurance - Lumpsum Distributions vs. Rollover Distributions - Model Portfolio Creation and Comparisons - Mortgage Amortization - Net Unrealized Appreciation of Employer Stock - Net Worth Estimator - New Value Calculator - Pension / Defined Benefit Income estimates - Portfolio Allocation Rebalancing - Portfolio Optimization and «Advice» - Portfolio Return Calculations - Paycheck Tax Savings - Required Minimum Distribution calculations - Retirement Budget and Expense Planning - Retirement Income Analyzer - Retirement Savings Estimator - Risk Tolerance Profile - Roth 401k - Roth Conversion - Roth v. IRA illustrations - Short Term Savings goals - Social Security benefit estimates - Stretch IRA / Legacy IRA illustrations - Tax Free Yield calculaModel Portfolio Creation and Comparisons - Mortgage Amortization - Net Unrealized Appreciation of Employer Stock - Net Worth Estimator - New Value Calculator - Pension / Defined Benefit Income estimates - Portfolio Allocation Rebalancing - Portfolio Optimization and «Advice» - Portfolio Return Calculations - Paycheck Tax Savings - Required Minimum Distribution calculations - Retirement Budget and Expense Planning - Retirement Income Analyzer - Retirement Savings Estimator - Risk Tolerance Profile - Roth 401k - Roth Conversion - Roth v. IRA illustrations - Short Term Savings goals - Social Security benefit estimates - Stretch IRA / Legacy IRA illustrations - Tax Free Yield calculations

- retirement savings and income - Pre-59 1/2 72t Calculations (avoiding penalty tax)- college savings and 529 plan illustrations - college cost and tuition data - Coverdell education savings - risk profile questionnaires and quizes - model portfolio illustrations - asset allocation and portfolio optimization - portfolio management and value tracking - 401 (k) retirement savings - Cost of waiting to save - Effect of Taxes and Inflation - Estate Tax Estimator - Finding Money for your savings goals - Health Savings Account (HSA) illustrations - Historical Hypothetical Portfolio Performance - Impact of Inflation - Life Insurance Needs Analysis - IRA Eligibility (all types of IRAs)- IRA Savings and Goal Analysis - IRA Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs)- IRA to Roth Conversion - Long Term Care Insurance - Lumpsum Distributions vs. Rollover Distributions - Model Portfolio Creation and Comparisons - Mortgage Amortization - Net Unrealized Appreciation of Employer Stock - Net Worth Estimator - New Value Calculator - Pension / Defined Benefit Income estimates - Portfolio Allocation Rebalancing - Portfolio Optimization and «Advice» - Portfolio Return Calculations - Paycheck Tax Savings - Required Minimum Distribution calculations - Retirement Budget and Expense Planning - Retirement Income Analyzer - Retirement Savings Estimator - Risk Tolerance Profile - Roth Conversion - Roth v. IRA illustrations - Short Term Savings goals - Social Security benefit estimates - Stretch IRA / Legacy IRA illustrations - Tax Free Yield calculamodel portfolio illustrations - asset allocation and portfolio optimization - portfolio management and value tracking - 401 (k) retirement savings - Cost of waiting to save - Effect of Taxes and Inflation - Estate Tax Estimator - Finding Money for your savings goals - Health Savings Account (HSA) illustrations - Historical Hypothetical Portfolio Performance - Impact of Inflation - Life Insurance Needs Analysis - IRA Eligibility (all types of IRAs)- IRA Savings and Goal Analysis - IRA Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs)- IRA to Roth Conversion - Long Term Care Insurance - Lumpsum Distributions vs. Rollover Distributions - Model Portfolio Creation and Comparisons - Mortgage Amortization - Net Unrealized Appreciation of Employer Stock - Net Worth Estimator - New Value Calculator - Pension / Defined Benefit Income estimates - Portfolio Allocation Rebalancing - Portfolio Optimization and «Advice» - Portfolio Return Calculations - Paycheck Tax Savings - Required Minimum Distribution calculations - Retirement Budget and Expense Planning - Retirement Income Analyzer - Retirement Savings Estimator - Risk Tolerance Profile - Roth Conversion - Roth v. IRA illustrations - Short Term Savings goals - Social Security benefit estimates - Stretch IRA / Legacy IRA illustrations - Tax Free Yield calculaModel Portfolio Creation and Comparisons - Mortgage Amortization - Net Unrealized Appreciation of Employer Stock - Net Worth Estimator - New Value Calculator - Pension / Defined Benefit Income estimates - Portfolio Allocation Rebalancing - Portfolio Optimization and «Advice» - Portfolio Return Calculations - Paycheck Tax Savings - Required Minimum Distribution calculations - Retirement Budget and Expense Planning - Retirement Income Analyzer - Retirement Savings Estimator - Risk Tolerance Profile - Roth Conversion - Roth v. IRA illustrations - Short Term Savings goals - Social Security benefit estimates - Stretch IRA / Legacy IRA illustrations - Tax Free Yield calculations

The lower levels of baseline sugar sweetened drink consumption in the UK compared with the US may in part explain why the effect on obesity that we estimate in the UK is much less than that estimated in the US.12 The differences with respect to other modelling studies may also be partly explained by their use of higher own price elasticity values for sugar sweetened drinks than we have calculated and used here.18 22 52 We can not make direct comparisons between the results of our study and the results of recent studies of the effect of reducing sugar sweetened drink consumption on body weight in children, 5 7 as the relation between energy balance and change in body mass index in children who are growing is different from that in adults.

This model is large enough to cover your little one in stroller or crib (30» x32»), but in comparison to previous model it isn't a good solution for swaddling.

If you're searching for a video comparison of the sucking (or suckling) motions of both the Medela and the Spectra (the model used is the S2) I recommend this one on Youtube as it's the best demonstration I have been able to find.

On Samsung's website, you can use a cool comparison tool to compare the different models on different carriers to see which one works best for you.

Preparing expectant couples for new - parent experiences: a comparison of two models of antenatal education

Take a look at the photo of a 2006 model for comparison.

Comparison 1 Midwife - led versus other models of care for childbearing women and their infants (all), Outcome 28 Fetal loss equal to / after 24 weeks and neonatal death.

In order to assess the quality of the body of evidence relating to the following outcomes for the main comparisons of midwife - led versus all other models of care for childbearing women and their infants.

Comparison 1 Midwife - led versus other models of care for childbearing women and their infants (all), Outcome 7 All fetal loss before and after 24 weeks plus neonatal death.

However, a model which included them was also fitted, with results given alongside the main findings for comparison.

Given the heterogeneity in the choice of outcome measures routinely collected and reported in randomised evaluations of models of maternity care, a core (minimum) data set, such as that by Devane 2007, and a validated measure of maternal quality of life and well being would be useful not only within multi-centre trials and for comparisons between trials, but might also be a significant step in facilitating useful meta - analyses of similar studies.

Nevertheless, despite the model controlling for parity and many other known confounders, there remains a greatly elevated risk of PPH for women who have planned hospital births in comparison to those who plan a home birth (odds ratio, 2.5, 95 % confidence interval, 1.7 to 3.8).

Comparison 1 Midwife - led versus other models of care for childbearing women and their infants (all), Outcome 27 Fetal loss less than 24 weeks and neonatal death.

Kaplan - Meier and Cox proportional hazards survival analyses were used in unadjusted and adjusted analyses of the effect of pacifier use on breastfeeding duration.19 Logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate the effect of pacifier timing on breastfeeding duration.20 Significance levels were not adjusted for multiple comparisons.

cP <.05 for pairwise comparisons of infants who consumed rice with infants who consumed no rice or rice products in general linear models that also included specific gravity.

dP <.01 for pairwise comparisons of infants who consumed rice with infants who consumed no rice or rice products in general linear models that also included specific gravity.

Given the heterogeneity in the choice of outcome measures routinely collected and reported in randomised evaluations of models of maternity care, a core (minimum) dataset, such as that by Devane 2007, and a validated measure of maternal quality of life and wellbeing would be useful not only within multi-centre trials and for comparisons between trials, but might also be a significant step in facilitating useful meta - analyses of similar studies.

Comparison 1 Midwife - led versus other models of care for childbearing women and their infants (all), Outcome 10 Induction of labour.

Comparison 1 Midwife - led versus other models of care for childbearing women and their infants (all), Outcome 7 Overall fetal loss and neonatal death.

Comparison 1 Midwife - led versus other models of care for childbearing women and their infants (all), Outcome 8 Antenatal hospitalisation.

Comparison 1 Midwife - led versus other models of care for childbearing women and their infants (all), Outcome 24 Neonatal convulsions (as defined by trial authors).

Comparison 1 Midwife - led versus other models of care for childbearing women and their infants (all), Outcome 15 Attendance at birth by known midwife.

Although our review was able to distinguish which type of model was being provided in most cases, it is necessary for approaches to be sufficiently described in published papers, to inform assessments and comparisons of outcomes.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Midwife - led versus other models of care for childbearing women and their infants (all), outcome: 1.1 Regional analgesia (epidural / spinal).

Comparison 1 Midwife - led versus other models of care for childbearing women and their infants (all), Outcome 1 Regional analgesia (epidural / spinal).

Comparison 1 Midwife - led versus other models of care for childbearing women and their infants (all), Outcome 9 Antepartum haemorrhage.

Comparison 1 Midwife - led versus other models of care for childbearing women and their infants (all), Outcome 14 Opiate analgesia.

Comparison 1 Midwife - led versus other models of care for childbearing women and their infants (all), Outcome 13 No intrapartum analgesia / anaesthesia.

Comparison 1 Midwife - led versus other models of care for childbearing women and their infants (all), Outcome 2 Caesarean birth.

The lower probability for Clinton in the FiveThirtyEight model is partly (by comparison with most but not all models) due to 538 having a smaller estimate of her likely lead in votes.

When making your Roomba model comparison, look for one that is able to navigate multiple rooms.

The sulfate traces it left behind in the Greenland and Antarctic ice, served as a comparison for the current model study.

While large - scale climate research models offer a systems view of what the transport sector, for example, could contribute to climate protection in comparison to the energy sector, the study presented in Science, however, examines transport - related issues within the sector by using more recent and more specific data on how people commute and travel.

Interactions of these proteins with the outer membrane in vivo and in vitro are well known, allowing for direct comparisons with the synthetic model.

In drug design, for example, the function of a protein is determined by sequence comparison and 3D modelling programs.

But even if the growth of the economy is not algorithmic, an algorithmic approach may still be of use in finding statistical features of model economies for comparison to the real one.

As part of the study, 179 human participants played Concentration 20 times each — 10 times for accuracy and 10 times for speed — to give the researchers a point of comparison for their ACT - R model.

The astronomers» long - term goal is to find about ten similar examples of these cold flows, which would allow for a much more detailed comparison of their observations with the predictions of numerical models.

Comparison with the modeled temperature response in histAll is inconsistent without accounting for stratospheric water, land - use, solar, etc, some of which are poorly characterized (hence I did not make use of a calculation like this).

NeuroStemcell is focused on the identification and systematic comparison of progenitor cell lines with the most favourable characteristics for mesDA and striatal GABAergic neuronal differentiation, generated either directly from human embryonic stem (ES) cells, from Neural Stem (NS) cells derived from ES cells or fetal brain, from induced Pluripotent Stem (iPS) cells or from in vitro short - term expanded neural progenitors from ventral midbrain grown as neurospheres (VMN, Ventral Midbrain Neurospheres) 4, and perform rigorous and systematic testing of the most prominent candidate cells in appropriate animals models.

For example, cross-model comparisons may help to pinpoint key cell types and molecules involved in lineage decisions, reveal evolutionary inventions, and may allow to interpret genetic disease models (for example in mouse) by mapping to human or other systeFor example, cross-model comparisons may help to pinpoint key cell types and molecules involved in lineage decisions, reveal evolutionary inventions, and may allow to interpret genetic disease models (for example in mouse) by mapping to human or other systefor example in mouse) by mapping to human or other systems.