Anthony Ehrhardt has a great series going on about the Characteristics of Pharisees
for modern churches.
It has been the irritating grain of sand in the oyster, around which the Catholic ages deposited the priceless pearl of supernatural, otherworldly piety; but
for the modern church it has remained an impossible ideal of asceticism, an ideal whose very first precondition of fulfillment is lacking, namely, the eschatological outlook upon the world, the belief in the impending Judgment and the Age to Come.
Martin was discussing his new book, Building a Bridge, which is a kind of etiquette manual
for the modern Church.
Though the problem is so rooted in the nature of both Church and secular society that it is always present, yet it has a peculiar urgency
for the modern church which is confronted with unusual evidences of misery in the life of human communities and of weakness within itself.
And the stuff I write about isn't mainstream material that lots of people would find useful
for the modern church agenda.
Not exact matches
MLK Now, in its third consecutive year focused on the contributions of women to the
modern movement
for parity in the celebration of the ideals of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., was held at Riverside
Church Jan. 15, 2018, the site where Dr. King gave his controversial 1967 «Beyond Vietnam» speech.
Far from seeking his own advancement, each move up the echelons of the episcopal ladder has been met with surprise by Justin Welby, perhaps influenced by the fact he was told there wasn't «place
for him in the
modern Church of England» when he first applied
for ordination.
Many believers, including many Christian leaders, consider it a powerful tool
for fighting what they say is one of the
modern church's biggest problems: porn addiction.
I am pretty sure when they revamped back in the day to a oil heating system at my mom's home
church, that was a big
modern step
for them from the wood burning stoves.
The Mormons got this right, and as explained in Corinthians, the
modern christian
churches have lost the principle of baptism
for the dead... and ultimately lost the doctrine of a just God.
Never, so far as I can tell, has
modern historical study made it impossible
for a contemporary person concerned about intellectual integrity to believe what the
Church (or the synagogue) has long taught as necessary
for true faith.
As a historian I do not want people downplaying horrific events
for modern points - be it the early persecution of the
church, the Crusades, the holocaust - whatever it might be.
The founding fathers almost got it right, instead of simple separation of
church and state, they should have clearly stated that there is no place
for religion in the
modern world.
For instance, an attempt to root out modern elements in the church ought to be viewed with the same suspicion we should have for any systematic program of destructi
For instance, an attempt to root out
modern elements in the
church ought to be viewed with the same suspicion we should have
for any systematic program of destructi
for any systematic program of destruction.
This failure, he suggests, then paved the way
for a
modern, hierarchical reconfiguration of ecclesial authority, in which
Church authorities took a more decisive role in the determination of doctrine.
As conduits
for «postmodern spirituality,» argues Wells, these
churches «appear to be succeeding, not because they are offering an alternative to our
modern culture, rather because they are speaking with its voice, mimicking its moves.»
«Christian leaders consider it a powerful tool
for fighting what they say is one of the
modern church's biggest problems: p * rn addiction.»
In «Evangelii Gaudium» (The Joy of the Gospel), officially known as an «apostolic exhortation,» Francis calls
for church reforms, urges Catholics to be more bold and joyful, and castigates elements of
modern capitalism.
It's also inspired the
church's great
modern poets — the people responsible
for updating the outdoor marquee with new service times and mind - boggling puns — to rise to their finest hour and show these gamers what they're missing if they just come
for the Pokemon.
When the
church addresses public economic issues from a revisionist perspective, it presses the biblical imperative
for justice while simultaneously accepting
modern economic insights into the nature of productivity and growth.
The book of Job has served as a philosophical Rorschach blot
for its most outspoken interpreters, from the Talmudic rabbis and
Church Fathers through their medieval philosophical successors and down to
modern philosophers, theologians, and creative writers.
The large divergence of episcopal opinion revealed (concerning the
modern relevance of
church teaching,
for instance on contraception) is never reflected in the directives of our national Conference of Bishops.
My hope is that as evangelicals move beyond the
modern paradigm of individual autonomy (particularly as it applies to biblical interpretation), we will begin to appreciate
church tradition as an undeniable foundation
for our faith.
Questions also are raised about the identity of the
church that plays such a major role in the Radical Orthodox account of history, about whether there is a doctrine of providence implicit in it, about the dismissal or ignoring of Protestantism, about the role of Jesus in its Christianity, about the role of Socrates in its Platonism, about its failure to engage with the challenge of
modern scientific and technological developments, about how other faith traditions are related to this version of faith, and about whether this is a habitable orthodoxy
for ordinary life.
I owe my own enthusiasm
for the
church to the vitality and freedom I felt in the late sixties in the aftermath of the Second Vatican Council, when Pope John XXIII threw the windows of the
church open to the best thought of the
modern world.
At the Edinburgh conference in 1910, Bishop Charles H. Brent of the Protestant Episcopal
Church had keenly felt the need
for a full discussion of theological beliefs in order that the
Churches might find the proper mutual support in the
modern world.
It might be supposed that we could turn to the schools, since the task of the schools is constantly being enlarged, but the very nature of the
modern school precludes this, as we have already noted in Chapter I. (
For a careful and scholarly study of this problem see Alvin W. Johnson, The Legal Status of
Church - State Relationships in the United States with Special Reference to the Public Schools, University of Minnesota Press, 1934.)
So the «emerging
church»
for example is addicted to post
modern gobbledygook and political correctness.
Since
modern man,
for various reasons, is almost completely out of touch with the life and activity of the alert contemporary
Church, he must be urged to go back and consider the act of divine initiative on which all Christian conceptions finally rest, before he can fairly observe any contemporary
Church.
This Autumn is a particularly opportune time
for encouraging our parishioners to reflect upon the fact that there is actually a significant gap between
modern moral values and those of Christ in the
Church.
«We hope this is a step forward
for St George's and many other
churches like it, in staying ahead in the
modern era.»
Whatever the ultimate outcome
for Bonhoeffer in the history of doctrine and the history of the
modern church, his name is certainly one of influence.
I am not very unlike you, very cynical of the
modern culture of the «
church», but I have found,
for me, that to fixate on the problems of the
church does not seem to build the Lingdom of God.
Too much drama and politics in the
church for a
modern day leper like me.
For the revolutionaries, a complete breakthrough to the
modern was impossible without a secularism robust and unremitting enough to displace and reoccupy the social and intellectual space of a
church, ancestrally embedded in the political order of the ancien régime.
Calling
for «a
modern equivalent of Jubilee,» signers of a proposal fundamentally to revise the property tax structure petitioned the endorsement of the 1984 General Conference of the United Methodist
Church.
The proof of panthrotheistic was the establishment of the monotheistic religion, Jesus Christ was the God whose religion had convinced the roman emperor to decree that the Roman Empire had to adapt Christianity as it's official religion, paving the way
for science to grow or proliferate and in the
church era, because of the fast growth of science in the Christian world.But we are now at the crossroad of change, Christian doctrine is now in conflict with
modern science, so it has to evolve to panthrotheism, the future religion
His treatment of the role of the Christian in the
modern world will probably be a continuing inspiration
for many people if the prestige of the
church continues to diminish.
Wills says that unlike the popes of old, whose overriding sins were greed, venality, and lust
for temporal power, the
modern popes, beginning with Pius IX, recruit Catholics into «structures of deceit» about
Church doctrine and discipline.
It was the missionary movement and the
churches in the mission field that gave impetus
for the emergence of the
modern ecumenical movement at the beginning of this century.
The
modern use of e-mail, especially
for the
church, has many benefits as well as shortcomings.
The
modern pluralistic religious ethos has provided materials
for a quantum leap in ideological justifications, and has made the task of honest discernment of social policy more difficult and all the more necessary at all levels of the
church.
Maybe as the
church goes through upheavals in
modern times, we should search
for a new term.
and to say a roman emporer is responsible
for the
modern Bible shows you have no idea of the history of the Bible... we have a list of almost ALL the NT that was ALREADY accepted widely by the
church in 150 AD!
Unfortunately, the 1959 UCC Statement of Faith has attained quasi-creedal status
for some UCC people, and functions in a number of
churches as a kind of
modern confession test.
To speak of sexual undertakings in the way implied by the traditional marriage rites of the
churches is to deny people access to a basic human good from the start and
for reasons that are difficult if not impossible
for modern people to grasp.
Rather it involves the recognition that the
modern Church can now be only one society among many, and that its distinctness in this sense occasionally demands accommodation
for sake of self - protection.
Ironically, while black theology theoretically relies heavily upon expressions of the people, such as freedom and sorrow songs and sermons, the more academic elites of black theology — those who have the luxury of tenure and endowed professorships in prestigious white seminaries and universities — seem to have little respect
for the
modern black
church.
Many other
modern interpreters of marriage have made the same mistake, and so have many people in American
churches, who are tempted to join with Coontz and insist that couples get married
for reasons of love alone, Economic, kinship and network issues and even the desire to have children are sometimes seen as contaminations of the purity of marital love.
for the
modern «
church - court» has no power of global excommunication, only the power to read, to think, and to «be more noble» and compare everything to the scriptures.]