The percentage of Buffalo Public School graduates who went on to a two - or four - year college increased to 67 percent for the Class of 2015, putting the district on the heels of the national rate
for more affluent districts.
Not exact matches
If I were running the government, I would see to it that school
districts that serve the poor would have a larger share of the tax revenue than school
districts that serve the
affluent,
for in the poor
districts there is far
more ground to be made up to provide the open equality of opportunity, and equality of opportunity must be a part of every just society.
We do have a several
districts on the NSLP, and most of them, admittedly, are in
more affluent areas with none
more than 10 % of the students qualifying
for free & reduced meals.
Next we heard from Mark Terry, who gave a compelling comparison of his old school
district — a low SES urban
district with a high ELL population, an 85 % free / reduced qualifying rate, and a high need
for meal and nutrition education services — and his current
district, which is
more affluent with a much lower free / reduced qualification rate and a community of parents who have high expectations
for student success and a healthy lifestyle.
For example, what if districts with lower property values received more federal reimbursement dollars for school meals than districts with higher property values, with the affluent districts making up the difference via a higher lunch price for paying studen
For example, what if
districts with lower property values received
more federal reimbursement dollars
for school meals than districts with higher property values, with the affluent districts making up the difference via a higher lunch price for paying studen
for school meals than
districts with higher property values, with the
affluent districts making up the difference via a higher lunch price
for paying studen
for paying students?
The percentage of Buffalo Public School graduates who went on to a two - or four - year college increased to 67 percent
for the Class of 2015, putting the
district on the heels of the national rate
for more affluent districts.And new data released Wednesday by Say Yes Buffalo show that the rate of college - going graduates has gone up 10 points since 2012, the year before the o...
Affluent respondents were less willing to spend
more for their
district schools, but even among them a clear majority (52 percent) preferred an increase in expenditures.
Districts in the most
affluent quartile face cuts in state funding, but they are able to
more than compensate
for these reductions by increasing local funding.
For example, security firms that offer drug sniffing dogs market their services to inspect the lockers of students in the
more affluent school
districts.
Students in low - income schools are
more likely to be given an «A»
for work that would receive a «C» in a
more affluent school, according to «Raising Achievement and Closing Gaps Between Groups: Lessons from Schools and
Districts on the Performance Frontier,» an Education Trust study released last November.
The appeal
for a fair funding formula that accounts
for the growth of mostly urban
districts that are less
affluent and
more diverse is the strongest call yet to fix a problem that started three decades ago.
In fact, according to an analysis by Urban Institute, students in Colorado's poorest
districts receive only an additional $ 401 per student relative to
more affluent districts, a ratio that has remained relatively unchanged
for the past 20 years even as we get smarter about the impacts of income inequality and stratification across society.
With regard to teacher retention,
district leaders in interviews with APA noted that they face a consistent trend where, after several years of teaching in the
district, new teachers gain valuable training, coaching, and experience but then many leave SAISD
for teaching jobs in surrounding,
more affluent school
districts.
Jefferson County: Cindy Stevenson, who served as the award - winning superintendent from 2002 - 2012, focused efforts on better supports
for teachers, a «strive
for greatness,» and
more attention towards
district managed schools (rather than on charters in the
district who tend to serve a
more affluent population).
But if DC officials want to keep
more affluent families in the
District, they'll need to figure out a way to make high - quality school pathways
more convenient and predictable
for them as well.
A better approach would be to exclude
affluent districts from Title I eligibility, thus making
more funds available
for students living in concentrated poverty.
Some work in
more affluent school
districts and have greater autonomy to create individual programs, yet still are accountable
for students» learning and their performance on high - stakes achievement tests.
Connecticut seems to accept a constricted vision of education
for its neediest children that is never imposed on
more affluent districts.
In short, Relay would lower the bar
for teacher preparation in Connecticut, increasing the likelihood that students in
districts such as Hartford, Bridgeport, and New Haven would receive teachers who have not met the same standards of preparation as those in
more affluent districts.