He said he believed there was «overwhelming support from parents»
for more grammar school places.
Yet despite the DfE report stating that the PISA data «provided little support» to arguments that academic selection boost the progress of the most disadvantaged pupils, ministers said the PISA results support plans
for more grammar schools.
Justine Greening seemed unenthusiastic about the prime minister's Tory heartlands view of education, characterised by the push
for more grammar schools.
BBC Education Editor Branwen Jeffreys says the statement clears the way for draft plans to be brought forward, including Theresa May's proposals
for more grammar schools in England.
While few would expect a major thrust
for more grammar schools, there might still be a drive to increase capacity and «reach».
Mr Gove, debating education policy alongside the former US education secretary Arne Duncan refused to be drawn on whether he agreed with the push
for more grammar schools in England.
Not exact matches
The young reporters
for the Paralympic Post London 2012 are: · Al Maatin Pereira Dos Santos, St Thomas
More RC
School, London · Alice Charlotte Conroy, Notre Dame High
School, Norwich · Bradley Neen, Queen Elizabeth
Grammar School, Penrith · Carina Canavan, St Ciaran's College, Tyrone, Northern Ireland · Emily Jamison, Limavady High
School, Londonderry, Northern Ireland · George Hayes Simonds, King Edwards
School, Bath · Jacob Sacha Joy, St Thomas Aquinas Catholic
School, Birmingham · Keri Trigg, Newtown High
School, Newtown, Wales · Lucy Michaeloudis, St Dominic's Sixth Form College, Middlesex · Tavishi Kanwar, Highgate
School, London The team of student journalists are looking forward to reporting from the London 2012 Paralympic Games.
Support
for grammars is strong across all age and income groups with a remarkable 85 % of 18 to 24 year - olds (many of whom will be first - time voters) wanting
more grammar schools.
More recently, the Coalition government's plans
for all
schools to become academies have raised some controversy within the
grammar school sector.
More grammar schools are not the answer to improving social mobility and preparing Britain
for the future
Earlier this month shadow education secretary David Willetts affirmed the Conservatives» support
for city academies and refusal to build any
more grammar schools.
A Department
for Education source said that the Queen's Speech was an unambiguous decision not to go ahead with creating
more grammar schools.
For every one child that might successfully make it through a
grammar school and go on to university there will be many
more left behind at the local secondary believing they weren't good enough.
The Tories do sometimes legislate
for things that Labour would have done anyway, like get rid of
Grammar schools, build
more houses etc (not sure what SSM is), but their basic impulse is to resist progress.
Mr Farage said a number of his policies — such as one to bring back
more grammar schools - appealed to Tory MPs who were slavishly voting «
for a leader who appears to be
more of a social democrat».
Here you will find articles about studying the Portuguese language, the city of Rio de Janeiro, Portuguese tips
for grammar and popular carioca expressions, the
school's events and much
more.
He said: «The Liberal Democrats are the party of education, and that means we believe in an excellent education
for all, so any plans to bring in
more divisive
grammar schools will be utterly opposed by my party.
Powell has said that selective education «creates barriers
for disadvantaged children» and has called on Prime Minister Theresa May to rethink proposals to allow
more grammar schools to open.
Grammar schools in Kent have been encouraged to provide up to 700
more places
for children from disadvantaged backgrounds.
More than 100 Conservative Party MPs are expected to call
for the ban on new
grammar schools to be scrapped, according to a report from the Telegraph.
Speaking to the Guardian, Farron said: «The Liberal Democrats are the party of education, and that means we believe in an excellent education
for all, so any plans to bring in
more divisive
grammar schools will be utterly opposed by my party.
The same analysis also found that pupils from poorer backgrounds who performed just as well as their
more well off peers were still less likely to attend
grammars, with 66 per cent of children who achieve level five in both English and Maths at Key Stage 2 who are not eligible
for free
school meals going to a
grammar school compared with 40 per cent of similarly high achieving children who are eligible
for free
school meals.
Although an official announcement is yet to be made, it is thought Prime Minister Theresa May is considering opening new
grammar schools and the rumours have been given
more validity after a leaked memo written by Department
for Education (DfE) permanent secretary Jonathan Slater seemed to confirm
grammars were on the DfE's agenda.
Public Opinion A YouGov poll found that only 38 per cent of people believe the government should build
more grammar schools and encourage
more schools to select on academic ability, which suggests there isn't a huge amount of public support
for the idea.
She said: «Teachers and heads in the thousands of existing state
schools in the UK which are facing real - terms cuts in funding
for their pupils will be dismayed to see the Chancellor throwing
more money at free
schools and
grammar schools.
Under the new reforms
grammar schools will be expected to offer lower pass marks
for poorer pupils, let children sit tests in primary
schools and venues near their home, and encourage
more children to take the entry exams.
The Commission has called on the government to rethink its plans
for grammar schools and
more academies, cautioning that there is no evidence either works to improve social mobility.
Where it is different from the
more traditional comprehensive or
grammar school routes is that relationships with industry are considered to be an integral seam between education and preparing the student
for the world of work.
Or, if we look at
grammar schools or independent
schools, many of which are not only selective but also
more academic and less vocational which in itself can close off certain avenues
for students.
The prime minister, Theresa May, has been revealing
more detail about her plans
for grammar schools.
Research has shown that children who have been tutored
for the 11 - plus are
more likely to win a
grammar school place.
The existing funding system
for grammar schools was criticised
for being arbitrary and tending to give
more money to city
schools than those in suburbs and shire counties.
Many are «over-tutored»
for the
grammar school 11 - plus or private
school Common Entrance exams at 13 and then can not keep up with
more talented classmates later.
The government says that providing
more grammar school places would give extra opportunities
for poorer pupils.
Committee chair, Neil Carmichael, said that since the plans
for more grammars had been announced «the air has been thick with the sound of claims and counter-claims on the benefits and disadvantages of
grammar schools».
For example,
grammar school pupils tend to outperform pupils of similar ability at other types of
schools where the ability range is
more mixed.
Education Secretary Justine Greening has published plans calling
for more selective
schools in England, and a Department
for Education spokesman said any new
grammars would «prioritise the admission of disadvantaged pupils».
Commenting on the Education Select Committee's report on the Government's case
for creating new
grammar schools, Dr Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL), said: «The Government has failed to provide evidence that
more selection in
schools will improve education
for all children and not harm the majority.
A Department
for Education spokesman said: «We know that
grammar schools provide a good education
for their disadvantaged pupils, and we want
more pupils from lower - income backgrounds to benefit from that.»
A Department
for Education spokesperson said
grammar schools provided «a good education
for their disadvantaged pupils», adding: «we want
more pupils from lower income backgrounds to benefit from that».
«Simply allowing
more disadvantaged pupils to attend
grammar schools will not create the systematic improvement needed
for a world - class education system,» he said.
«In the areas where there are
more places, the benefits are going to be
more diluted
for those children in the
grammar schools, as they become
more like mixed ability
schools.»
«I suggest the MPs are far
more against
grammar schools than those who voted
for them are.
Secondary
schools in areas where the brightest pupils are selected
for grammar schools will be
more likely to be classed as coasting under the government's newly revealed definitions.
The research, which is published with the Sutton Trust's response to the government's consultation on providing
more good
school places, raises serious concerns about using
grammar schools in their current form as a vehicle
for social mobility.
Rayner received a warm reception at the Association of
School and College Leaders annual conference in Birmingham this afternoon, where she attacked plans
for new
grammar schools and called
for money allocated
for free
schools to be spent «
more fairly».
He found in this piece of research that children from prosperous families in Kent (the biggest area
for selective
schools in England) are
more likely to get into
grammar schools and also that in selective areas, poorer children overall get relatively worse GCSE results than they do in comprehensive areas.
In another exchange, Carlton Huffman, a legislative aide
for GOP state Rep. Jonathan Jordan, forwarded a student's email to the legislative aides
for Republican House members with the comment, «
More great
grammar results from the public
school system.»
There was said to be backbench disquiet that the push
for more selection had been sidelined - and there will be scrutiny of whether Mr Hinds, a former
grammar school boy, will be
more sympathetic.
The same analysis
for secondary
schools shows
grammar schools, academically selective at age 11, are by far the most biased towards
more affluent pupils -LRB--98.8 percentage points)-- suggesting they aren't quite the «engines of social mobility» some
grammar school advocates say they are.