Sentences with phrase «for negligent hiring in»

«An employer could be liable for negligent hiring in that they failed to take precautions before hiring a dangerous person,» Waterfill said.

Not exact matches

While in most instances employers can be held responsible for the negligence of their employees through what is known as Negligent Retention and Negligent Hiring, the man that the sex offender was accompanying is a contract worker for MasTec Advanced Technologies.

In addition to holding a trucking company responsible for the actions of its employees, trucking companies can also be held responsible for a collision if the company was negligent in hiring, training, supervising or retaining a careless driveIn addition to holding a trucking company responsible for the actions of its employees, trucking companies can also be held responsible for a collision if the company was negligent in hiring, training, supervising or retaining a careless drivein hiring, training, supervising or retaining a careless driver.

If a company is negligent in the hiring, training, or employment of a driver, they may be held financially responsible for any injuries and harms that result.

If a company fails to conduct such investigation or is careless in its investigation, it could be held responsible for the negligent hiring of a driver.

The plaintiffs also included a negligent hiring claim, arguing that the trucking company was negligent in hiring the truck driver, given his past convictions for drugs and significant history of traffic offenses.

While it did not find Pizza Hut negligent in hiring Fisk — who had only been licensed to drive for three months at the time of the crash — it held the company liable under trusty old respondeat superior.

If a jury finds that a defendant was negligent, it may award past and future medical expenses, lost wages including for time spent going to doctor's appointments, property damage, the cost of hiring someone to do household tasks you aren't able to do because of the accident, emotional distress, permanent disfigurement or disability damages, and any reduction in your future earning ability because of the injury.

Lastly, I have criticized the government for its negligent misallocation of scarce education resources and for putting in place a litigation gauntlet that serves mainly to grind down litigants with excessive costs in an attempt to deflect as many people as possible from adding to the government «s potential cost of having to hire more judges and so on.

Lastly, I have rightly criticized the government for its negligent misallocation of scarce education resources and for putting in place a litigation gauntlet that serves mainly to grind down litigants with excessive costs in an attempt to deflect as many people as possible from adding to the government «s potential cost of having to hire more judges and so on.

A trucking company may also be found directly liable for such damages if the company is determined to have been negligent in screening, hiring, training, monitoring, or retaining a driver whose negligence caused an accident victim's injury or death.

When a failure to do so results in injuries to others on the road, our Commercial Truck Accident Attorneys can help you bring a claim against the company for negligent hiring, negligent training, or negligent supervision.

Tire detreads; Bair Hugger defects; defective products in trucks; fuel - fed fires; negligent hiring by trucking companies; appellate victory for plaintiff's team on behalf of injured Marine; statistics released on truck, bus wrecks in America; AIEG truck seminar in Chicago.

A lot of other states simply call it vicarious liability, but the important thing is if that's what you're trying to show, that a company or employer should be responsible for the negligence of their employees, you need to be able to show that the person who was negligent, the employee, was acting for the most part in furtherance of their employer's interests, doing the job they were hired to do.

While a criminal record for violence may not be allowed into evidence in a trial for negligent driving, a criminal record for leaving the scene of an accident, or drunk driving, should certainly be allowed into evidence against a company hiring a driver who is subsequently involved in a motor vehicle accident.

The accident victim may also be able to sue the trucking company for negligent hiring, retention, or supervision of a negligent truck driver — especially in cases where the truck driver has a history of prior accidents, negligent driving, moving violations, or fines.

It is recommended to include Hired and Non-owned Auto Coverage in your Business Auto Policy, as an employer is usually liable for the negligent acts of employees when they get in an accident when driving a personal or rental car while on company business.

The fear of being sued for negligent hiring is a huge factor in the decision to perform employee background screening.

The Florida statute gives employers the benefit of the doubt in negligent hiring suits, presuming they are NOT negligent if, before hiring the employee, the employer conducted a background investigation of the prospective employee and the investigation did not reveal information that reasonably demonstrated that the individual was unsuitable for the particular work or employment in general.

Negligent hiring is a legal theory based on the principle that employers can be liable for the wrongful acts of their employees should the employer fail to use reasonable care in the hiring process.

In fact, many employers believe that they can bypass the threat of litigation for negligent hiring or tort liability by using workers who are screened elsewhere when, in reality, companies should assume that regardless of the party with ultimate responsibility for the acts of contingent workers, the company that worker is «representing» bears the most risIn fact, many employers believe that they can bypass the threat of litigation for negligent hiring or tort liability by using workers who are screened elsewhere when, in reality, companies should assume that regardless of the party with ultimate responsibility for the acts of contingent workers, the company that worker is «representing» bears the most risin reality, companies should assume that regardless of the party with ultimate responsibility for the acts of contingent workers, the company that worker is «representing» bears the most risk.

provides legally compliant results that reduce workplace violence, theft, substance abuse and negligent hiring liabilities Able to perform background searches in over 200 countries, this company is known for its rapid turnaround time and industry competitive rates.

[1] The industry really began booming after 9/11 in an effort to, among other things, ensure workplace safety and protect companies from lawsuits for negligent hiring.

These internal incidents of workplace violence leave employers largely liable for any problems that occur in the workplace under the «Negligent Hiring Doctrine» dictating that employers can be held liable for damages if they knowingly employ persons known to pose a potential threat to co-workers or the public.

If employers hire employees they knew — or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known — were dangerous, unfit, or unqualified for the position, employers can be sued for negligent hiring if injuries or death occur.

BankInfoSecuirty is offering the online webinar for on employment screening for banks and financial institutions on the topic of «Avoid Negligent Hiring — Best Practices and Legal Compliance in Background Checks.»

In addition, for employers to be able to defend themselves from allegations of negligent hiring, they must demonstrate due diligence in their hiring process.&raquIn addition, for employers to be able to defend themselves from allegations of negligent hiring, they must demonstrate due diligence in their hiring process.&raquin their hiring process.»

 The goal is to help employers navigate the maze of legal requirements and potential pitfalls in order to minimize lawsuits from applicants for violation of their rights, or litigation for negligent hiring if a background check is insufficient.Â

The Jacksons are suing AEG Live for $ 40billion in damages, for its alleged negligent hiring and supervision of Dr Conrad Murray, who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in the singer's death.