Sentences with phrase «for nonpregnant women»

Interestingly enough, for pregnant women, their own mate value was positively associated with relationship satisfaction and partner satisfaction, whereas for nonpregnant women, their own mate value was not associated with any other variable, including self - esteem.

The daily recommended dose of iron during pregnancy is 27 mg, where for nonpregnant women it is 18 mg — a pretty significant difference!

Another common question clients ask about prenatals is whether their partners can prenatal — and the answer is the same as it is for a nonpregnant woman.

Not exact matches

According to the Institute of Medicine, the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for iodine in lactating women is 290 μg per day, compared with 150 μg / day for nonpregnant adults of both genders.

Overall, the USPSTF found inadequate evidence on screening pelvic examinations for the early detection and treatment of a range of gynecologic conditions in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adult women.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has concluded that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of performing screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adult women for the early detection and treatment of a range of gynecologic conditions.

To issue a new recommendation, the USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the accuracy, benefits, and potential harms of performing screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adult women 18 years and older who are not at increased risk for any specific gynecologic condition.

Among alcohol users 18 to 44 years old, 15 percent of nonpregnant women and 1.4 percent of pregnant women report that they binge drank in the past month, according to a 2012 phone survey from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

389 D IETARY, FUNCTIONAL, AND TOTAL FIBER Total Fiber AI Summary, Ages 19 Years and Older AI for Men 19â $ «30 years 38 g / d of Total Fiber 31â $ «50 years 38 g / d of Total Fiber 51â $ «70 years 30 g / d of Total Fiber > 70 years 30 g / d of Total Fiber AI for Women 19â $ «30 years 25 g / d of Total Fiber 31â $ «50 years 25 g / d of Total Fiber 51â $ «70 years 21 g / d of Total Fiber > 70 years 21 g / d of Total Fiber Pregnancy Method Used to Set the AI There is no evidence to suggest the beneficial effects of fiber in reduc - ing the risk of CHD for pregnant adolescent girls and women is different from nonpregnant adolescent girls and wWomen 19â $ «30 years 25 g / d of Total Fiber 31â $ «50 years 25 g / d of Total Fiber 51â $ «70 years 21 g / d of Total Fiber > 70 years 21 g / d of Total Fiber Pregnancy Method Used to Set the AI There is no evidence to suggest the beneficial effects of fiber in reduc - ing the risk of CHD for pregnant adolescent girls and women is different from nonpregnant adolescent girls and wwomen is different from nonpregnant adolescent girls and womenwomen.

Total Fiber AI Summary, Pregnancy AI for Pregnant Women 14â $ «18 years 28 g / d of Total Fiber 19â $ «30 years 28 g / d of Total Fiber 31â $ «50 years 28 g / d of Total Fiber Lactation Method Used to Set the AI There is no evidence to suggest the beneficial effects of fiber in reduc - ing the risk of CHD for lactating adolescent girls and women are different from nonpregnant adolescent girls and wWomen 14â $ «18 years 28 g / d of Total Fiber 19â $ «30 years 28 g / d of Total Fiber 31â $ «50 years 28 g / d of Total Fiber Lactation Method Used to Set the AI There is no evidence to suggest the beneficial effects of fiber in reduc - ing the risk of CHD for lactating adolescent girls and women are different from nonpregnant adolescent girls and wwomen are different from nonpregnant adolescent girls and womenwomen.

Means and SD's for Dependent Variables for Total Sample (N = 125), Pregnant Women (N = 66) and Nonpregnant Women (N = 59).

First of all, correlations between all variables were calculated, separately for pregnant and nonpregnant women (see Table 2).

Ideally, one would also track a control group of nonpregnant women for the same amount of time to investigate any fluctuations in relationship or partner satisfaction across time, as well as between groups.

Although we took great care to recruit pregnant and nonpregnant women that had similar demographic backgrounds, we wanted to control for any influences of participant age, relationship duration, and relationship status (i.e. whether participants were married, cohabiting, etc).

Univariate tests show that there were significant differences between pregnant and nonpregnant women for satisfaction with the relationship (F (1,123) = 14.93, η2 =.11, p <.001), satisfaction with the partner (F (1,123) = 8.23, η2 =.06, p <.01), relationship satisfaction (F (1,123) = 4.10, η2 =.03, p <.05), and partner's mate value (F (1.123) = 3.40, η2 =.04, p <.05).