Graylan Hagler, a candidate for D.C. Council who attended the speech, challenged Henderson's record of progress, pointing to the continued low test scores
for nonwhite students.
Not exact matches
Still, the pressure
for students — particularly underrepresented
nonwhite and low - income applicants — to package themselves like this is acute at a time when «diversity» remains the only rationale
for affirmative action that the Supreme Court has consistently upheld, most recently in the case of Fisher v. University of Texas.
According to the U.S. Department of Education, about 50 percent of the public school
student population is
nonwhite (a percentage that's expected to increase
for years to come).
Research (by Irenee Beattie, Josipa Roksa, and Richard Arum) that examined appellate court cases from 2000 to 2002 found that, on average, those cases emerged from secondary schools with 29 percent
nonwhite students compared to 37 percent
nonwhite students in the national population of secondary schools (the latter weighted
for enrollment size to be comparable to the court case data); appellate cases also emanated from schools with more educational resources per
student (
student / teacher ratios of 16.3 compared to 17.5 nationally).
In the School Rights Project, we found that white
students were nearly twice as likely as
nonwhite students to report having pursued a formal legal remedy
for a perceived rights violation.
These characteristics include, in addition to a variety of measures of
student achievement as of 1996, the percentages of
students in the school that are eligible
for free school meals, those who are
nonwhite, and those with special educational needs; the pupil - teacher ratio and the number of
students enrolled; whether the school is all girls, all boys, a religious school, or in London; and several measures of the qualifications of the teaching staff.
Their summary of the sector's academic outcomes, which draws heavily on a series of studies by the Center
for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) at Stanford University, is likewise relatively uncontroversial: there is a positive achievement effect
for poor,
nonwhite, urban
students, but suburban and rural charters come up short, as do online charters, about which the authors duly report negative findings.
Moreover, all
students — rich or poor, white and
nonwhite alike — miss out on the substantial benefits of learning in richly diverse classrooms.9 As the research shows,
students across the spectrum are better prepared
for post-secondary success when they have been educated in diverse schools and have learned alongside peers who come from all walks of life.10
Some members of the Congressional Black Caucus have attacked the gainful - employment proposal and other regulations as discriminatory, as
for - profit colleges enroll disproportionate numbers of low - income
students and
nonwhites.
School district leaders and state education chiefs have been trying to figure this out
for years now, especially because research shows that having a teacher from similar demographic backgrounds has social and academic benefits
for students, most of whom are
nonwhite.