Sentences with phrase «for obvious injuries»

Not exact matches

All he brings is lack of motivation, excuses aplenty, usually involving «biased» or incompetant refs, no obvious coaching or even any understanding whatever of the need for defence and hard running, an injury crisis every season, discontent among fans, slavery to 70th minute subs, whether needed earlier or not, a belief in last millenium tactics (mostly indiscernable tactics), a love of waving his arms and shouting uselessly at the innocent fourth official (who does not make onfield decisions anyway!)

No we can't, because the very obvious deficiency was Arteta, and it has been known for a long time that Arteta simply is not up to handling the DM position for extended periods on his own, and that this is a position that we are very exposed on, as Coq will not be able to attend every game, through suspension, injury, or needing to be rested as was the case here — so WHY did Wenger not recruit for this position in the transfer window when plenty of people, such as Schneiderlin, had already expressed a preference to move to London.

The ELO alogrithm has no scope for injury adjustments, and this is maybe the most obvious example of it (it's actually mentioned on FiveThirtyEight's original methodology page).

If I knew Wilshere will be injury free for most part of his, days at Arsenal I'd take him over Ozil.Ozil is already developed but I can't imagine how good Wilshere would have been if he even had Ozil's fitness.Since Wilshere might probably be out repeatedly then Ozil would be the obvious choice.

Who's at fault for letting the Rams quarterback keep on playing despite an obvious head injury during Sunday's game with the Ravens?

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

The obvious choice for me would be the Pole as he is a tough tackling central midfielder and with Coquelin on the injury list and Elneny at the African Cup of Nations we are a bit short there, but I am not sure about signing him on a permanent basis.

Also, DD and OS could opt for NBA this year but returning is the best bet, the obvious risks being major injury or subpar performance.

even when he suffered a serious knee injury, instead of accepting the fact that he would never stick his legs into the spaces that were crucial for someone with straight ahead speed to succeed, the club actually contemplated giving him a chance to play up top where his lack of physicality, size and holding up play talents would been on display for all to see... these are not the actions of a club that really cares about winning at the highest levels, but they are the actions of a club that wasn't interested in spending the necessary resources to purchases a world - class striker, which is usually the most expensive position on the pitch... instead we adopted the horrible phrase «like a new signing» and proceeded to allow this ridiculous experiment to carry on, which ultimately caused some discomfort on the training pitch and inside the locker room as players battled for a position that shouldn't have been theirs for the taking in the first place... don't get me wrong, I believe that Walcott is a talented player, who can help a team reach their goals, if their goals are relatively modest... just look at the teams who supposedly expressed interest in his services and they weren't the kind of clubs who aspire to win at the highest levels... as for the reasons why he hasn't been bitching and moaning about moving on just look at the wage benefits he receives from our club and his obvious desire to enjoy the societal advantages that come with playing in North London for a club with worldwide appeal... so instead of continuing to try to fix a coat with a broken zipper simply move on and buy a new and better coat

That leaves one forward position to fill and with Joel Campbell having joined Sporting Lisbon of Portugal on loan and Alex Iwobi having picked up a minor injury, the clear and obvious choice for the boss is between Alex Oxlade - Chamberlain and Theo Walcott.

My main concern is that the glaring weaknesses were obvious a year ago (incuding long term injury to welbeck) and finances were available then, so we could have made signings for these positions a year ago.

To be fair it was pretty obvious Ozil was rested, noone fell for the «slight» foot injury.

As for all teams, the obvious worry is injuries.

Sanchez and Ozil need rest and an injury to either right now would be disastrous for obvious reasons.

At the end of it the debate will boil down to DO WE HAVE WHAT IT TAKES TO WIN THE EPL OR THE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE??? first let's start with what went wrong the other season nothing we finished 12 pts behind the league leaders chelsea and 5 pts behind city... mmmh injuries (no longer news and infact we're already in it), lack of a proper dm till the new year (le coq emergence who desperately needed a back up), lack of a lethal striker (giroud's 3mnth injury noted though obviously not good enough and the sole reason wenger himself was reportedly looking for an «exceptional striker») and finally the obvious lack of depth in key positions (DM, CBs and yes a CF).

It was painfully obvious he had just come back from injury and hadn't been in the side for a while.

Totally agree.Jack has been more than unfortunate with the many injuries he has suffered over the last 5 - 6 seasons.You have to credit him for the way he has fought to regain his starting place in the team this last 3 months but you always feel he is just one tackle away from being sidelined again.Im sure his contract offer would have included many incentives but we have previously been too loyal to long timed injured players at this club - Diaby Rosicsy Carzorla to name the obvious ones.We all love Jack and his passion for the club is never doubted but we need to be more ruthless in these decisions and I feel Jack will be the first to highlight the clubs position.

Since the injury to Pedro Obiang West Ham have picked up just four points from five games including three heavy away defeats; and the sad thing is there doesn't seem to be any obvious solution to the problem for the remainder of the season.

It's fairly obvious that Bolton fans aren't happy with the start of the season, we do have some major injuries to our best players, however that's no excuse for the bizarre team selections made by Owen Coyle.

Losing Obiang, Reid and Antonio is most unfortunate but the injury prone nature of our strikers has been obvious for all to see for a long time.

Two days after his injury, the signs of a concussion became very obvious to his family and they took him to the E.R. for evaluation.

They've been black and blue and red and swollen and still occasionally manage to make me feel like a complete MORON for missing an obvious injury - waiting - to - happen.

For obvious reasons, unexplained injuries are some of the scariest signs for a parent to witneFor obvious reasons, unexplained injuries are some of the scariest signs for a parent to witnefor a parent to witness.

We need an offence that fills the obvious gap in the law for cyclists who cause serious injury or death.

One of the obvious consequences of increased development will be more deaths and injuries from traffic accidents, and tobacco - related deaths are also expected to surge, accounting for 10 percent of all fatalities by 2015.

The researchers suggest increasing compliance with current ambulance triage guidelines and future research to inform whether these guidelines should be revised to be more sensitive for picking up severe head injuries that may be less obvious at the time of presentation.

If you have an obvious injury, like a broken arm, wait for your date to ask about it then give a simple and undetailed account of what happened.

For starters, there are plenty of obvious advantages to driving safely: avoidance of accidents means steering clear of damage to your vehicle, physical injury to yourself or others, missed work, etc..

Choosing a healthy puppy is basically looking him over for any obvious signs of injuries, sickness, or neglect.

Dogs won't typically suffer obvious, outward injuries from prong collars unless the collar is left on for months.

The last is defined as a pain lasting for more than 3 months, which can persist beyond or in the absence of the original noxious stimulus and most often is not associated with an obvious external injury, but rather arises from less apparent chronic conditions, such as cancer and osteoarthritis.

Indoor hazards may be less obvious but they do exist, for example: household chemicals, human medications, eating dangerous objects (elastic bands, needle - and - thread), pull - string blinds, electrical wires, crush injuries from toppled items such as stepladders, caught in slammed doors.

Adding insult to injury in the obvious misplaced priorities of the scientific establishment we can actually and practically prepare for a Carrington Event by modification of the electrical grid managment procedures, better detection and prediction of CME trajectories, and building up a stock of the large transformers which would, even with improvements in response, still be ruined in large numbers.

In other instances where the injuries are not so obvious, for example traumatic brain injuries (TBI), a doctor may need to evaluate the victim and provide his or her opinion regarding the permanent and long - term nature of the harm sustained by the accident victim.

While the courts remain slow to conclude that a dog bite or a fall from a horse is unlikely to cause severe injury, there is certainly scope for a defendant to argue in less obvious cases, such as, for example, a claimant being knocked over by a dog, that the damage was not likely to be severe and that consequently the claimant has failed to satisfy the requirements of s 2 (2)(a).

Due to a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Texas, it is easier for businesses and property owners to defend against premises injury cases like slip and fall accidents, specifically dangers that are deemed «known or obvious.»

This may seem obvious, but it's often difficult to determine which parties shoulder the responsibility for an alleged injury.

MacIsaac & Company's lawyers have access to excellent medical and rehabilitation specialists who can identify the nature and severity of spinal cord injuries, including less obvious spinal cord injuries, and provide a prognosis and other recommendations upon which compensation for future losses is based.

If the Ontario personal injury lawyers are successful in turning back the Wynne government's attack on their profits — they might want to reach out to folks like Mr. Wright and finally get busy fighting for solutions to blatantly obvious access to justice problems rife in their turf.

Accidents involving motorcycle or ATV riders have a much greater chance of resulting in major traumatic injuries — for obvious reasons.

However, even if the unsafe condition was obvious, the person or company that maintains the property may still be liable for injuries if it was unreasonably dangerous under the circumstances.

A property owner is not typically liable for your injuries if you failed to avoid an open and obvious danger.

Of course the next obvious question is why didn't the plaintiff lawyers call the regulatory College (CPO) to confirm that this «opposing expert» was in fact properly qualified to proffer neuropsychological opinion evidence for the defence in brain injury cases?

The suit relies on the wanton disregard by the NHL and player's union for the known risks associated with Boogaard's injuries and the obvious foreseeable dangers of Boogaard's prescription habits.

While there is an obvious conflict in one adjuster handling both the Part VII and the injury claim for the same person, ICBC refuses to acknowledge this conflict.

Even so, cases like this can be difficult to win for all of the above reasons and because defects which are «open and obvious» still may not be the basis for an injury claim.

It may be obvious that your incident allows for a personal injury claim, or you may not be fully aware of whether it qualifies.

Damage or injury done by a dog excluded from the policy would not be paid, for obvious reasons.

Assuming there are no obvious challenging situations such as a period in jail, a serious workplace injury in his field, or an easily identifiable and turbulent work history of drugs or absenteeism, then there should be no reason that at the very least, John isn't getting shortlisted for a job.

The most obvious reason is that delinquency puts a youth at risk for drug use and dependency, school drop - out, incarceration, injury, early pregnancy, and adult criminality.