Sentences with phrase «for opposing points of view»

«Until we have an empathetic point of view for an opposing point of view, we're missing really valuable information and that's true almost in every context, particularly in the business context.»

Not exact matches

There are points in there where Jim and Mike have differing recollections or points of view and we try to air those and let them speak for themselves as opposed to drawing our conclusions.

From this point of view party politics should be regarded not as a battle between opposing groups for precedence and power, but as a common pursuit, along somewhat different paths, for the common good.

For example, as the result of law suits instituted by public - interest groups, the courts held that whenever broadcasters present a particular point of view on a matter of public importance, they also must provide opportunities for opposing viewpoints to be presentFor example, as the result of law suits instituted by public - interest groups, the courts held that whenever broadcasters present a particular point of view on a matter of public importance, they also must provide opportunities for opposing viewpoints to be presentfor opposing viewpoints to be presented.

You above all others have seemed to find a way past most anyone's insecurities to welcome and debate opposing points of view and still come out with an appreciation for that person's contributions.

Oh... forgot you Proving... I wasn't referring to what he said... on the surface, it's fine to have a point of view... whether I agree with it or not... but when you are A) in a position of influence and B) spending money to fight the opposing view... and it's to stop two people who love each other from wedding in the eyes of their Lord, then it is hate... if your ignorance allows you to think my comments are stupid... so be it... and one last point about slavery... whether it was Democrats or Republicans who supported, or fought against slavery... many justified slavery because of their perverted interpretation of the bible... most people can't tell a simple story from one person to the next... but so many foolish Christians think they know exactly what the bible is saying w / o any doubt... forget the fact that it's been translated and passed for 1000s of years... yup you must be right that God is against two people loving each other... He must have made a mistake with those folks huh?

For those who generally oppose radical Islam, this is viewed as both practical pushback (If you ban face coverings, conservative / radical Muslims wouldn't want to live in that society); as well as symbolic pushback (inasmuch as, per above point, face coverings are seen by many as a symbol of Islam).

3) For those who generally oppose radical Islam, this is viewed as both practical push - back (If you ban face coverings, conservative / radical Muslims wouldn't want to live in that society); as well as symbolic push - back (inasmuch as, per above point, face coverings are seen by many as a symbol of Islam).

«While I understand and respect the point of view of conservatives who have been opposing him, Trump is, in fact, the most conservative candidate running for president on a wide range of issues, including immigration, jobs, taxes, Supreme Court appointments and regaining our image as a world leader,» Long said.

Diametrically opposed to this point of view on the EU, the ECHR, foreign aid and social housing are voters for the seven left and liberal parties: the Labour Party, the Liberal Democrats, the Green Party, the SNP, Sinn Féin, the SDLP and the Alliance.

European editor Anne Forde discovered, in an interview with Hannah Kokko, an evolutionary ecologist in Helsinki, Finland, that one of the keys to Kokko's professional success is her ability to balance opposing approaches and points of view: life with work, the organismal approach of evolution with the population approach of ecology, and an appreciation for the local environment with the mind - broadening value of more exotic and distant locales.

Asked about their support for «giving tenure to teachers,» just 33 % express a positive view and 49 % are opposed — but this reflects a jump in support for tenure of 5 percentage points over the past year.

Conflict in a lesson can can be just as useful — for instance, when students engage with opposing points of view or take on a complex problem.

That situation is improving due to a greater appreciation of and reliance on research that is of high quality and high relevance as opposed to evidence that is selected and utilized primarily because it provides support for established point of views and policy preferences.

The way I see it is, from an author's point of view, use of the term «indie author» would tell me that this author is someone who is «self employed» as opposed to working for a publishing company.

For example, if your topic is legalization of marijuana, you need to find at least three arguments supporting your point of view and provide rebuttal to the opposing views.

Perhaps one of the reasons for the success and unique appearance of Thomsen's work is that she is not coming out of an Anglo - American point of view as in «Color Field» abstraction — the term that displaced Clement Greenberg's more complex notion of «Post-Painterly Abstraction» — but from an education in Germany that allowed her to evolve in a more qualified direction, as opposed to the kind of fashionable quantifications to which American higher art education has finally succumbed.

I'm not a lawyer so I feel unqualified to make too many assumptions about courtroom procedures, but I can well imagine that the tutorial session, with presentations from the respective view points of opposing councils, would establish a baseline and set a professional tone for the subsequent proceedings as well as to give insight as to how the participants think.

For a great overview of both sides of the argument (framed around the biofuels industry), I recommend you look at two Green Inc. posts framing the debate, one today on the industry point of view that intensified agriculture can cut land use, and one from last week on the opposing view.

I am, however, confident that those like Lewandowsky and closer to home, Joshua, are not a force for good in either reconciling opposing points of view or advancing our understanding of the universe.

It becomes more important for practitioners to impress other scientists and policymakers than it does to seek the truth, and we reach a point of rampant confirmation bias and censorship of opposing views and data.

Her natural - law point of view (whatever western society has traditionally done for the past couple of centuries is right — I exaggerate a little) leads her to oppose same - sex marriage and various other social positions that she has no actual evidence to show are harmful, while ignoring a lot of the harm done by existing practices.

However, those who oppose software patents looked at the Bilski case as an opportunity for the SCOTUS to establish criteria for patentable subject matter («patent - eligibility») that, ideally, would have caused collateral damage (or collateral benefit from the anti-software-patent point of view) to the patentability of software.