Sentences with phrase «for parties who»

Experienced professionals typically find that this process frequently results in a higher quality of outcome for their clients, particularly for parties who wish (or need) to have an on - going relationship after the dispute has been resolved.

Collaborative Practice works best for parties who wish to settle without going to court and are willing to commit to a good faith effort to do so.

For parties who are unrepresented, drafting can be done by a neutral drafting attorney or by a neutral scrivener.

For parties who do not want to retain attorneys, yet need professional assistance during separation or divorce, Felicia serves as a neutral facilitator in a managed process.

Collaborative Divorce is best for parties who trust each other and prefer to have an experienced divorce lawyer advocating for their interests.

This is an option for parties who have, may or will agree upon all aspects of their divorce.

Engagement can be hampered by the influence of impending litigation, even for parties who are not involved.

The number two job is to model positive, respectful behavior for the parties who, given their situation, are often operating in a state of diminished capacity.

To Whom It May Concern: I'm writing to you on behalf of Our Family Wizard, a new and innovative Internet product available to families who are transitioning through separation and / or divorce, or for those parties who have common children.

We are the leader in sales and marketing recruiting and ensure expertise, networking and available growth positions for all parties who work with KAS.

HSH acknowledged that the usual position would be for parties who had entered into a commercial relationship to have intended that any dispute arising out of that relationship would be decided by the same tribunal.

Mediators offer an alternative method of dispute resolution for parties who wish to avoid court - based litigation.

So what does this mean for parties who are negotiating support?

This is not necessarily a positive development for the parties who must attend and pay their attorneys attend these investigative conferences.

This can be a challenging but important step for parties who are confronting for the first time that their income and wealth, together with their proprietary business methods and processes, together with their customer and vendor data, developmental strategies, competitive edge and C - suite information, are all potentially at risk of being brought into the public domain by virtue of the publicly - accessible nature of the courthouse.

To Whom It May Concern: I'm writing to you on behalf of Our Family Wizard, a new and innovative Internet product available to families who are transitioning through separation and / or divorce, or for those parties who have common children.

The Mediation Rules enables speedy and cost - efficient dispute resolution for parties who wish to resolve their disputes amicably.

Mediation offers a speedy and cost - efficient dispute resolution method for parties who wish to resolve their disputes amicably.

Dana Watts provides vigorous representation for parties who are defending against a breach of contract lawsuit or asserting a claim for damages.

Finally, the jury system also provides an important forum for parties who have little or no access to private dispute resolution.

The Court noted that this was «regrettable, and a lesson for the future for parties who find themselves in such a position that a prompt, early appeal on this sort of point at that stage is to be seriously considered.»

I am reluctantly coming to the conclusion that the best choice, for parties who want their rights determined, is private arbitration.

«I was mainly responsible for pouring drinks for parties who had reserve a table for bottle service.

The plan was to scrap payments in for parties who were «good for the money».

It is advisable for parties who have agreed on including an arbitration clause in their contract to provide at least some detail as to how an arbitrator will be selected and the procedures and timelines to be used in the arbitration process.

Portfolio financing is useful for parties who don't need financial assistance, but seek to offset risk or cut their legal expenditure.

Mediation is recommended for parties who are able to communicate with one another and feel safe discussing difficult issues with their spouse.

Arbitration is appropriate for parties who can not communicate with one another and insist on a third party to make a final decision for them.

The messages from the Court of Appeal over a 15 - year period were clear and consistent in respect to potential costs sanctions for parties who failed to embrace the ADR process.

The Act provides additional choices and tools for parties who find themselves the victim of trade secret misappropriation, including the powerful new weapon of an ex parte seizure.

Perhaps going forward, for parties who find themselves in the same position as the co-founder of ASOS, one should be arranging one's affairs in deference to co-shareholders.

Thus, it is unlikely contracts for parties who have Attorneys will change dramatically if at all.

In a useful reminder for parties who might not otherwise consider themselves to be subject to English jurisdiction, in the recent case of Bestolov v Povarenkin, the High Court confirmed that, where a defendant is domiciled in England, the courts of this country have jurisdiction and moreover no discretion to decline jurisdiction.

In Alberta, spousal support is permitted only for those parties who are legally married.

This can be a great solution for parties who are able to focus on finding a solution rather than enforcing their rights....

Newman ADR also can hold a summary jury trial for parties who want to resolve a case but can't reach an agreement on the terms.

There's a lot to unpack in this matryoshka doll of brackets, including words like «shall» and «should,» which speak to whether or not any Paris agreement should be legally binding for the parties who ratify it — a point on which the European Union and United States disagree.

In addition, for those parties who are not party to the Kyoto Protocol or would not abide by that treaty, also have a responsibility to ensure comparability of their targets and actions under the AWG - LCA.

It's strictly a one - time viewing and even then only for parties who are fond of the cast or director Barry Levinson.

The new regulations came into effect in 1997, making divorce possible for parties who are separated for four out of the preceding five years.

They vote for parties who they think have the right level of credibility.

With only two candidates yet to be selected this probably underestimates support for those parties who do not yet have candidates, but nevertheless shows Johnson and Livingstone virtually neck and neck.

UKIP's coming second in the 2009 European elections were a reminder that there is a right wing of Great Britain that doesn't vote always Conservative, but might well vote for parties who would be plausible coalition partners for the Conservatives.

UKIP and its present trajectory is a rightwing backlash at and denial of the realities of 21st century Britain and as such what is toxic for parties who aspire to govern is not for a party of protest.

However as we know if the price is right and it's good for all parties who want it to happen the contract can be ripped up.

So the Tea Party should be voting for the party who's been actually reducing the size of government historically wouldn't you think?

And, that's a good thing for a party who has drawn lots and lots of negative attention over the past few weeks — from the still sluggish economy to the debate over the proposed New York City Islamic center to the pending House ethics trials for Reps. Charlie Rangel (D - N.Y.) and Maxine Waters (D - Calif.).

But if he did pretend it fooled enough of the electorate who thought he was too left wing, so they voted Tory, I can't believe that the electorate looked at Ed, said, Ah, he's only pretending to have spent the last 5 years denouncing New labour, let the 2 people who got him in place, Mkclusky and Paul Kenny, get Blaitites Liam Byrne, Frank fileld sacked, then say as opposed to new labour he had a social conscience, yet when it comes to it, he's really new labour as he's not left wing enough, I'll vote for a party who are right wing, they'd have all voted greens if they wanted it

Equally, she continued, «it is not enough for the party who fails to beat an offer to show that the decision not to take up the offer was a perfectly reasonable one.

Is there a way out for the party who may be materially worse off than they expected?