«Given the ambivalence of the U.S. Supreme Court's case law on whether the federal constitution provides a remedy
for partisan gerrymandering, state constitutions, with their focus on electoral equality and fairness, have the promise and the potential to be an effective means to address excessively partisan redistricting,» Tolson wrote.
It seems like a good test
for partisan gerrymanders that are unfair, but there would be a lot of other factors or dimensions (as discussed in the other answers - things like common economic interests) that might also make a district's representation unfair even within the efficiency threshold.
Not exact matches
«Democrats are extremely fired up right now,» said Sam Wang, a Princeton University neuroscientist and statistician who has developed a statistical model
for analyzing
partisan gerrymandering.
The U.S. Supreme Court announced that it would consider whether
partisan gerrymandering violates the Constitution, potentially setting the stage
for a ruling that could
for the first time impose limits on a practice that has helped define American politics since the early days of the Republic.
This state constitutional amendment will ban
partisan gerrymandering by outlawing legislative maps drawn
for political advantage.»
«This agreement will permanently reform the redistricting process in New York to once and
for all end self - interested and
partisan gerrymandering,» Cuomo said in March 2012.
We adopted the boldest and most pro-voter platform in history — calling
for expanding early voting and vote - by - mail, implementing universal automatic voter registration and same day voter registration, ending
partisan and racial
gerrymandering, and making Election Day a national holiday.
The Missouri Supreme Court «agreed with the trial court's decision to dismiss several counts (including
partisan gerrymandering claims), but remanded
for a determination of whether the congressional districts (particularly districts 3 and 5) were sufficiently compact under state constitutional law.»
Elections are run at the state level, so a state -
gerrymandered election could alter that balance of power in the state legislature, which would effect things like voter - suppression measures, enactment and enforcement of campaign finance regulations, and the ability of elections to be monitored and
for rules to be enforced by non-
partisan (or
partisan) entities.
In the process of setting electoral districts,
gerrymandering is a practice that attempts to establish a political advantage
for a particular party or group by manipulating geographic boundaries to create
partisan advantaged districts.
Late last night, the governor and legislature reached a deal on redistricting that essentially allows the State Senate's and Assembly's
partisan majorities to put in place
gerrymandered lines
for the next decade, and creates the framework
for a constitutional amendment to govern future redistrictings that creates a bipartisan commission to submit lines to the legislature
for approval.
«This agreement will permanently reform the redistricting process in New York to once and
for all end self - interested and
partisan gerrymandering,» Cuomo said.
Mr. Cuomo can improve the chances
for real electoral reform by repeatedly reaffirming his vow to veto any redistricting plan «that reflects
partisan gerrymandering.»
The governor also rescinded a campaign promise to veto any redistricting lines that were not non —
partisan and done by an independent commission, and in mid-March agreed to new lines
for the legislature that critics said were blatantly
gerrymandered.
Lawsuits fighting
partisan gerrymandering are pending around the country, and a census planned
for 2020 is expected to trigger nationwide redistricting.
The Supreme Court started the current term in October with a docket that could have a lasting impact on politics and culture, including major cases on
partisan gerrymandering and LGBT rights, but six months later, the justices haven't crossed off much on their to - do list, points out Todd Ruger
for Roll Call.
Marcia Coyle, the NLJ's chief Washington correspondent, sits down with Paul Smith, vice president
for litigation and strategy at the Campaign Legal Center, to dig into the Supreme Court's two
partisan gerrymandering cases this term.
Over the past year I've written about the Emoluments Clause; the No Religious Tests clause; limits on presidential power as defined in the steel seizure case; the meaning of the oath of office; how the Appropriations Clause constrains lawsuit settlements involving the federal government; how and whether
gerrymandering by race and
for partisan advantage affects constitutional rights; judicial independence; the decline and fall of the Contracts Clause; the application of Obergefell to issues of public employees and birth certificates; Article V procedure
for calling a new constitutional convention; and too many First, Second, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment controversies to list.