[Response: Right, in other words he has no intention of improving the science, but rather of tearing it down by tearing down individuals
for his peanut gallery.
«Open» — all comers, beginner questions welcome «Pro» — no beginner commentary (perhaps a «side» thread can be created
for peanut gallery discussions)
The kind of antics seen in this case may play well
for the peanut gallery, but they won't impress the critics.
If he wants to make a change, he has a clear choice; to continue to play Don Quixote
for the peanut gallery or to produce something constructive that is actually worthy of publication.
A very brief introduction as this is my first post
for the Peanut Gallery.
Not exact matches
So all cracks from the
Peanut Gallery will wait
for another day.
Instead, we have made a «
peanut gallery», and a
peanut ok zone in one room, (
for a student who relies heavily on
peanuts).
When Hillary Clinton made her much — anticipated announcement that she'd be running
for president, the inevitability of the act led to a vacuum in the
peanut gallery, where...
But then I started thinking that maybe they could be a little too «edgy»
for a hearing (even a simple appearance on the
peanut gallery).
It wants to appeal to eggheads, so it opens with a title card that promises what follows is based on «new» archaeological evidence; then,
for the alleged delight of the
peanut gallery, it trots out the same period epic dog - and - pony show to which we've been repeatedly subjected since Zulu Dawn.
If the
peanut gallery can't except that, much like how a stubborn child fails to learn the valuable lessons of a loving parent, so be it, because in the final analysis, history will forget those people:
for such individuals are lonely, have no humility, and leave this world not with a bang that, but with a pathetic valueless whimper that contributed nothing to further evolve or nurture the arts in its totality.
We discover and nurture new talent, like the guys at
Peanut Gallery who are real superstars and who we paired with Rob to adapt «Cogs»
for Home.
Art Slant Chicago Art Talk Chicago Bad at Sports Bite and Smile Brian Dickie of COT Bridgeport International Carrie Secrist
Gallery Chainsaw Calligraphy Chicago Art Blog Chicago Art Department Chicago Art Examiner Chicago Art Journal Chicago Artists Resource Chicago Art Map Chicago Art Review Chicago Classical Music Chicago Comedy Examiner Chicago Cultural Center Chicago Daily Views Chicago Film Examiner Chicago Film Archives Chicago
Gallery News Chicago Uncommon Collaboraction Contemporary Art Space Co-op Image Group Co-Prosperity Sphere Chicago Urban Art Society Creative Control Defibrillator Devening Projects Digressions DIY Film ebersmoore The Exhibition Agency The Flatiron Project F newsmagazine The
Gallery Crawl... Galerie F The Gaudy God Happy Dog
Gallery HollywoodChicago Homeroom Chicago I, Homunculus Hyde Park Artcenter Blog InCUBATE Joyce Owens: Artist on Art J - Pointe Julius Caesar Kasia Kay
Gallery Kavi Gupta
Gallery Rob Kozlowski Lookingglass Theatre Blog Lumpen Blog Marquee Mess Hall N'DIGO Neoteric Art NewcityArt NewcityFilm NewcityStage Not If But When Noun and Verb On Film On the Make Onstage
Peanut Gallery Peregrine Program Performink The Poor Choices Show Pop Up Art Loop The Post Family The Recycled Film Reversible Eye Rhona Hoffman
Gallery Roots & Culture
Gallery SAIC Blog The Seen Sharkforum Sisterman Vintage Site of Big Shoulders Sixty Inches From Center Soleil's To - Do's Sometimes Store Steppenwolf.blog Stop Go Stop Storefront Rebellion TOC Blog Theater
for the Future Theatre in Chicago The Franklin The Mission The Theater Loop Thomas Robertello
Gallery threewalls Time Tells Tony Wight
Gallery Uncommon Photographers The Unscene Chicago The Visualist Vocalo Western Exhibitions What's Going On?
Oh,
for the
peanuts in the
gallery that's means I can more effectively tell the difference these days.
I'd also (in a way) strongly second Steve Mosher's preference that we respect Gavin and Michael's plea «to open the discussion here to all of the authors to give their thoughts...» Only the authors should post comments (at least initially, and
for some time after that), and the
peanut gallery should watch.
Any number of my past writings here would also expose such an effort as laughable, so go ahead and get rich, unencumbered by any guilt
for having taken away meaningful employment from this viewer who sits catcalling from the
peanut gallery.
RC is a not in my opinion a forum
for serious discussion of science, its a forum
for the team to educate journalists and members of the
peanut gallery about the party line.
Thanks
for putting «professor» in front of your name, because like the PHd suffix used by others, it identifies you as an insecure fool seeking adulation from bottom - feeders in the
peanut gallery.
I remind you that the queries weren't mine, they were Michael Tobis's, and I tried to create reasonably neutral ground on my blog
for the two of you to discuss his questions with a minimum of distractions from either
peanut gallery.
From my vantage point in the
Peanut Gallery the lack of focus here created the opportunity
for a few to hyjack the discussion and turn it into a critique of CE and JC.
I was going
for winter frost... My
peanut gallery said the house looks like a department store!