Sentences with phrase «for previous posts on this topic»

JC comment: This is a very clear statement about the problems with advocacy by climate scientists — for previous posts on this topic at Climate Etc. see [link]

Read Celebrate Good Times for a previous post on this topic.

Not exact matches

This post has been on my mind from day one and it's also been a topic that was requested by readers in response to previous installments in the Safe Withdrawal Rate Series (click here for Part 1):

To prepare yourself for this series of posts, I strongly suggest you go read the previous posts I have written on this topic related to the Chaos Theory and the Proposal I am attempting to defend.

Despite my previous post and podcast on the topic, I still feel I could go on rambles in regards to these Kickstarter projects for pages more so I'll withhold myself here.

For help in determining if your home insurance settlement is fair, read my previous post on the topic.

(See my previous posts on these topics here and here for a more complete discussion of how they influence puppy development, if you're interested.)

For more on the terrestrial foods topic, see my detailed discussion in this previous post, and this recent (March 30) ScienceNews report on yet another, largely anecdotal «polar bears resort to bird eggs because of declining sea ice» story (see photo below, based on a new paper by Prop and colleagues), which was also covered March 31 at the DailyMail («Polar bears are forced to raid seabird nests as Arctic sea ice melts — eating more than 200 eggs in two hours,» with lots of hand - wringing and sea ice hype but little mention of the fact that there are many more bears now than there were in the early 1970s around Svalbard or that the variable, cyclical, AMO (not global warming) has had the largest impact on sea ice conditions in the Barents Sea).

JC summary: For background on this topic, see this previous Climate Etc. post Redefining dangerous climate change.

I'm not convinced for reasons I outlined on the previous post on this topic, but there's no way we can re-run the experiment without the disinformation campaign, and see how much more support would have been engendered.

However, as one of the lead scientists on the topic [and who was interviewed by the BBC for the Horizon documentary (transcript, previous post)-RSB-, I feel I should explain a few things about it without using religious analogies and stoking unnecessary fear.

For more information about why Twitter can be a valuable tool for your practice, read my previous post on the topFor more information about why Twitter can be a valuable tool for your practice, read my previous post on the topfor your practice, read my previous post on the topic.

Further to my previous posts on this topic (which you can find here and here) further reasons for judgement were released by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, addressing defence medical exams and the issue of travel.

Further to my previous post on this topic, reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, addressing whether MSP records were producible in a personal injury claim.

Further to my previous posts on this topic, if a Plaintiff successfully sues in the BC Supreme Court but receives damages below $ 25,000 they may be deprived of their court «costs» unless they had «sufficient reason» for choosing the Supreme Court over small claims court.

Further to my previous posts on this topic reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry discussing the mandatory nature of Rule 68,

Further to my previous posts on this topic, reasons for judgement were released last week by the BC Supreme Court, New Westminster Registry, disallowing the cost of a private MRI as a special damage in a personal injury claim.

For more on the topic of client's «spying on themselves «you can click here, here, here and here to access some of my previous posts.

When lecturing to members of the Bar or the judiciary in Canada and abroad on the topic of ODR, we are constantly asked how we could propose that parties settle a dispute outside of the realm of the Courthouse since they could reach an agreement that doesn't comply with the laws of the land or, rather, how we could suggest, as we did in a previous post, that the state sanction processes that would allow for this to happen.