Sentences with phrase «for product liability defense»

Lee has been recognized by the Alabama and Mid-South editions of Super Lawyers since 2010 for product liability defense.

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
It's common for retailers to require their suppliers to have a product liability policy explained in the first scenario above because if a product fails as a result of a manufacturing flaw or design flaw, they want to make sure there is a layer of protection between the manufacturer or importer and themselves and that their supplier will be able to handle the financial responsibilities of a product failure including paying any fines or legal defense costs.
On November 19, 2008, a Lee County, Alabama jury returned a defense verdict for Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. in a product liability suit in which the plaintiff alleged that a Dewalt small angle grinder was defectively designed.
Lightfoot, Franklin & White, LLC is pleased to announce that partners Samuel H. Franklin (Sam), Lana A. Olson and Harlan I. Prater, IV have been named to Who's Who Legal: Product Liability Defense for 2017.
For dedicated Alaska products liability defense attorneys, trust Matthews & Zahare, P.C. to deliver quality representation in the field of products liability law.
Professional Associations Monroe County Bar Association, Member New York State Bar Association, Chairman: Torts, Insurance, and Compensation Law Section (2003 - 2004) NYSBA Automobile Liability Committee Chairman (1991 - 1995) NYSBA House of Delegates, Delegate (1999 - 2004) New York State Trial Lawyers Association Risk and Insurance Management Society (2007 - present) Council on Litigation Management (2008 - present); Chairman, Products Liability Conference (2010 - 2013) New York Editorial Board, Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Company (1993 - 1995) Defense Research Institute (2000 - present) The National Fire Protection Association, Member The American Society for Metals, Member
A highly skilled Anchorage products liability defense lawyer with Matthews & Zahare, P.C. will provide more than just legal advice for a products liability case.
Serve as national trial and coordinating counsel for a leading manufacturer of food equipment systems in product liability matters, including the defense of product designs for meat grinders, mixers, slicers, saws, tenderizers and deep fat fryers.
Prior to joining TLR, Jami practiced commercial litigation for two years with Banowsky, Betz & Levine, P.C., in Dallas, and spent four years with Hartline, Dacus, Barger, Dreyer & Kern, L.L.P., also of Dallas, working primarily in products liability defense litigation.
In a complex products liability action involving alleged PCB contamination of a state office building, the Appellate Practice Group joined forces with litigation counsel to convert a $ 60 million judgment to a defense verdict for a large, multinational company.
In addition to his coursework, Kent also had practical experience clerking for one of Iowa's top civil law firms working on insurance defense, real estate, civil rights violations, and product liability cases.
We have obtained recent defense verdicts for our clients in cases involving commercial, professional liability, asbestos, catastrophic injury, products liability, medical malpractice, wrongful death and habitability claims.
Named «Best Lawyers» 2018 «Oklahoma City Lawyers of the Year» were Timothy J. Bomhoff for product liability litigation defense, W. Chris Coleman for both securities regulation and venture capital law, Robert W. Dace for mass tort litigation / class actions defense, Elizabeth L. Dalton for franchise law, Spencer W. Haines for closely held companies and family businesses law, Henry D. Hoss for construction litigation, and Susan B. Shields for tax litigation and controversy.
Attorneys named «Best Lawyers» 2018 Tulsa Lawyers of the Year» were Mary Quinn Cooper for product liability litigation defense, Charles Greenough for banking and finance litigation, Robert J. Joyce for environmental law, and Robert E. Spoo for copyright law.
We are leaders in products liability defense for insurers.
Our firm offers legal services for individuals and businesses in diverse practice areas, ranging from bankruptcy, personal injury, medical malpractice, product liability and prescription drugs to criminal defense, immigration, social security, employment and family law.
Hughes Hubbard's Product Liability and Mass Tort group is widely recognized by leading legal publications, jurists, clients and the products bar at large as a «go to» defense team for a company's most complex and challenging products litigation.
Prior to joining the firm, Kelly was an associate at Bryan Cave LLP, where she worked in the firm's product liability, white collar defense and investigations groups, and served as the associate liaison for the St. Louis office.
He has also served as National Coordinating Liability Counsel for a major international insurance company with reference to the defense of products liability claims involving thousands of individual claimants and several class actions consolidated in Federal Multi District LiLiability Counsel for a major international insurance company with reference to the defense of products liability claims involving thousands of individual claimants and several class actions consolidated in Federal Multi District Liliability claims involving thousands of individual claimants and several class actions consolidated in Federal Multi District Litigation.
He has extensive experience in product liability, professional liability, construction, and personal injury defense, and he serves as panel counsel for many corporations and liability insurers.
For more than 30 years, she has handled marine and energy litigation, including collision cases, hurricane losses, onshore and offshore oil and gas claims, hydraulic fracturing cases, marine and energy products liability litigation, the defense of personal injury and death actions, contract and lien claims, dock and stevedore liabilities and subrogation litigation.
Defense of Ciba - Geigy in Massachusetts state court product liability action for severe dermatologic disorder, progressive paralysis and ultimately death allegedly due to prescription drug
At Conroy Simberg, we are proud of our firm's nationwide reputation for delivering highly effective defense counsel in asbestos litigation matters, as well as mass tort and products liability cases, including silica claims.
She has focused her practice, for almost 40 years, in the area of complex commercial litigation, and has particular experience and expertise in handling product liability defense litigation, arbitration, mediation and counseling.
On May 5, 2017, we secured a complete defense verdict for client, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc., in a 5 - day product liability trial in the...
article published in FDCC Insights, A Journal for Civil Defense and Corporate Counsel Presenter at FDCC 2015 annual conference: «The Attorney Client Privilege in the Corporate Context» Article: «For Accountants and their Lawyers, an Ominous Sign» published in FDCC Commercial Litigation Newsletter Presenter at North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys 2015 annual meeting, Products Liability Section: «The Attorney Client Privilege in the Corporate Context» North Carolina Foundation Bar Association CLE Program: Managing Complex Litigation Certified Public Accountants Law Forum: So You've Been Sued: Practical Advice for Lawyers and Accountafor Civil Defense and Corporate Counsel Presenter at FDCC 2015 annual conference: «The Attorney Client Privilege in the Corporate Context» Article: «For Accountants and their Lawyers, an Ominous Sign» published in FDCC Commercial Litigation Newsletter Presenter at North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys 2015 annual meeting, Products Liability Section: «The Attorney Client Privilege in the Corporate Context» North Carolina Foundation Bar Association CLE Program: Managing Complex Litigation Certified Public Accountants Law Forum: So You've Been Sued: Practical Advice for Lawyers and AccountaFor Accountants and their Lawyers, an Ominous Sign» published in FDCC Commercial Litigation Newsletter Presenter at North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys 2015 annual meeting, Products Liability Section: «The Attorney Client Privilege in the Corporate Context» North Carolina Foundation Bar Association CLE Program: Managing Complex Litigation Certified Public Accountants Law Forum: So You've Been Sued: Practical Advice for Lawyers and Accountafor Lawyers and Accountants
Kate Vogelhuber is an associate in the firm's products liability and complex tort practice, where she concentrates on products liability defense and litigation management for a number of the firm's national clients.
Served as second - chair trial counsel and secured defense verdict following seven - week jury trial in the California Superior Court for the County of Orange of action for strict and negligent products liability and negligence based on allegations of design defects, manufacturing defects, and warning defects.
Lotz & Associates, P.C. is a boutique business and law practice that provides legal advice for medical malpractice, pharmacy malpractice, health law, employment law, personal injury law, insurance defense, products liability and commercial litigation.
Edward J. Murphy focuses his practice on Chicago products liability defense, and has been locally and nationally recognized for his legal ability in such cases.
For example, «defense of a chainsaw manufacturer over the alleged malfunction of a safety shut off switch in cold temperatures» provides more knowledge communication than a description like «product liability case.»
Likewise, we are national products liability counsel for Colgate - Palmolive Company, lead national counsel for The Coca - Cola Company in defense of purported class actions challenging the allegedly deceptive marketing of vitaminwater ® beverages, and national counsel for State Farm in homeowners» coverage cases arising out of Hurricane Katrina and Storm Sandy.
Jennifer M. Voss litigates complex, high - stakes matters for Fortune 500 companies, concentrating on product liability, tort, commercial litigation and legal malpractice defense.
Attorneys for both plaintiffs and defendants will find comprehensive coverage of such matters as: the advantages and disadvantages of suits based on strict liability, negligence and breach of warranty; the use of state consumer protection statutes; the duty to warn and its innumerable ramifications; the liability of the manufacturers, retailers and other potential defendants in the distribution chain; successor liability; federal preemption of common law claims; monitoring product safety during design, manufacturing and distribution; causation theories in actions involving multiple manufacturers; product misuse and alteration; the elements of proof needed in an action; recovery for economic loss; punitive damages; and the government contractor defense.
Ranked in 2015 for Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense: Consumer Products, Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense: Toxic Torts and Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense: Drug and Medical Device.
If you subscribe to the Marvel Unlimited Service directly with Marvel on the Website and you download the App through a third party (e.g., Apple / iTunes or Google Play), you understand that the third party is not responsible for addressing any claims by you or any other person relating to the App or your possession and / or use of the App, including, but not limited to: (i) product liability claims, (ii) any claim that the App fails to conform to any applicable legal or regulatory requirement, and (iii) claims arising under consumer protection or similar legislation; in addition, the third party is not responsible for the investigation, defense, settlement and discharge of any intellectual property infringement claim related to the App or your possession and use of the App.
Tags for this Online Resume: Defense, Root Cause Analysis, Spring, Teflon, Cost Control, Engineering, Product Development, Product Liability, Project Management, Project Manager
Tags for this Online Resume: Arbitration, Complaints, Defense, Insurance, Insurance Defense, Pleading, Product Liability, Filing, Scheduling, Legal
Tags for this Online Resume: Defense, Insurance, Insurance Defense, Commercial Construction, Construction, Satellite, Litigation, Product Liability, Criminal Defense, Guardian, lawyer, manager, corporate counsel, inhouse
Tags for this Online Resume: Insurance, Arbitration, Defense, Insurance Defense, Product Liability, Support, Accounts Receivable, Bankruptcy, Construction, Human Resources
Tags for this Online Resume: Insurance, Litigation, Product Liability, Employment Law, Premise Liability, Subrogation, Insurance Defense, Lexis Nexis, Microsoft Office, Westlaw, Client Relations
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z