For the purpose of this question we will ascribe to your preferred definition of «zeal to protect what beliongs to him» or per the Oxford Dictionary «Fiercely protective or vigilant of one's rights or possessions».
For the purpose of this question, I consider any election where the person did not hold office before, but did hold office after the election.
But
for the purpose of the question, this point is an excellent one as well.
For the purpose of this question, I would define labor as working for someone else, who is not a customer.
N.B. I do not necessarily hold that opinion myself, but
for the purposes of my question I would like to assume that it is correct...
For the purposes of this question, we can assume the Chief Executive is a judge or lawyer and ostensibly qualified to serve as a Supreme Court Justice.
For purposes of this question, a «contested election» must be an election with multiple candidates.
For the purposes of this question, we will ignore the issues of presence or absence of competitive markets, or density of capital accumulation.
The sugar tax petition ultimately failed, so
for the purposes of this question I wouldn't count it.
He said there is no need to make individuals available to those federal agencies solely
for the purposes of questioning them about their immigration status.
Let's assume,
for the purposes of this question, that there's no mercury: pure sugar, versus pure high - fructose corn syrup.
For the purposes of this question, the impact of gasoline vs ethanol will be felt as a change in effective working pressure.
For the purposes of this question, let's assume the following: Inflation is and will be a steady 2 % I am in the 30 % tax bracket and there is a home mortgage interest deduction I have a 30 - year fixed...
For the purposes of this question, I've got no plans or desire to move - obviously, anything could happen but there's nothing on the horizon that I can see that would make me want to move out before paying off the mortgage.
If you care about dogs you need to use your power as a constituent
for the purpose of questioning incumbents and candidates alike as to their position on the Puppy Mill Bills and you won't hesitate to ask your family, friends and colleagues to do the same.Â
Not to say that time exclusively equates to value for money, but
for the purposes of this question... Dana Jan: It's funny, we were talking about this at lunch.
Morals and ethics can be ignored
for the purpose of this question.
There has been a bit of discussion on a couple of Canadian lists lately of the appropriateness of commissioning an affidavit (or declaration or affirmation) by video link or by Skype (which is just another form of video, at least
for the purposes of this question, is it not?).
@Circero an adversarial hearing in an administrative court, even if there is a prosecutor, is actually civil
for the purposes of this question, so I'll consider it that way.
For the purposes of this question, I'm excluding cases where the newer document directly repeals older documents, or parts of them.
Now, it seems like the ethical thing to do is not to read illegally copied material, even if there's no law to stop you (especially as they might accuse you of being the one to have copied them — however,
for the purposes of the question, if possible, try not to turn this into a matter of getting prosecuted because someone thinks you copied the material that you didn't copy; for the purposes of this question, assume everyone in the world knows, believes and acts like you're not the one who copied it, impractical as that might seem).
Not exact matches
This is useful
for two reasons: First, you explain the
purpose of the meeting to anyone who didn't take the time to read your preparatory messages, and second, you open the floor to any
questions or concerns about the meeting's topic.
As business leaders answer that
question, they are redefining the role
of business in society and reassessing the notion that the primary
purpose of a company is to deliver profits
for its shareholders.
But before we get into classification
of employees
for employment tax
purposes, I want to address your
question about compliance checks.
Instead, Coinbase says it will release the Bitcoin Cash to customer accounts in January — raising the
question of whether,
for tax
purposes, the distribution takes place in 2017 or 2018.
Voogd advises to have a series
of questions or criteria
for the things you do to make sure they have a
purpose and are worth your time.
(Barron's) • In Search
of the Perfect Recession Indicator (Philosophical Economics) • A Fireside Chat With Charlie Munger (MoneyBeat) • Complexity theory and financial regulation (Science) • Five Pieces
of Conventional Wisdom That Make Smart Investors Look Dumb (CFA Institute) • This Lawyer Is Hollywood's Complete Divorce Solution (Bloomberg) • Curiosity update, sols 1218 - 1249: Digging in the sand at Mar's Bagnold Dunes (Planetary Society) • The Plot to Take Down a Fox News Analyst (NYT) • Ask the aged: Who better to answer
questions about the
purpose of life than someone who has been living theirs
for a long time?
I have ignored reasons that might justify lower discount rates or higher GDP adjustments
for China mainly because the
purpose of this essay is to explain why the U.S. multiple is so much higher than China's, and
of course these reasons exist, but I think whatever the correct ratio should be, there is no
question that advanced economies always justify higher multiples than developing economies because they tend to be economically more diversified and politically more stable, and they usually have institutions, including clearer legal and regulatory frameworks, more sophisticated capital allocation processes, less rigid financial systems, and smaller state sectors (which make smooth adjustment, one
of the most valuable and undervalued components
of long - term growth, more likely).
Inserting additional
questions on demographics which will likely result in invalid population totals must be avoided to preserve the fundamental
purpose for the exercise — obtaining an accurate count and geographical distribution
of individuals living in the U.S.
However, on the back
of recent survey work by Credit Karma, which reported 59 %
of 2,000 people
questioned regarding crypto - related profits admitting they hadn't declared them
for tax
purposes, it does seem to indicate a desire to keep gains made in Bitcoin et al to themselves.
I will not answer this
question in a quantitative way, which may disappoint those who want numerical forecasts; in fact, I will be making a few criticisms
of the simple models that are often employed
for this
purpose.
The Conservatives would argue that this was a
question about government business — you see, even when rules are applied, there are ways
of getting around them
for your partisan
purposes.
McDonald called out the
questions the ARF and its members should be asking: «What ethical guidelines guide the use
of «secondary data» collected
for some other
purpose, but now used
for research?
I will not argue whether or not the bible is the word
of a god translated by man, my only
question is, why would you follow a book that supports and idolizes a single deity who seems to have intentions
of converting the world to his worship alone (
for if there are no other gods, why then would Yahweh require that you «hold no other gods above him» — he just confirmed their existance) when said deity's followers have proven that their
purpose in life is to grind any opposition to their «holy law» into dust?
Discussion
of animals in a theological context, when it does arise, has tended to be limited to moral
questions: Can we experiment on animals, and if so,
for what
purpose?
The ideal
of human conduct constructed on the basis
of this concept
of God's will was necessarily moralistic and — the important point
for our
purposes — static; change was out
of the
question.
The
question is still a subject
of controversy among Muslim jurists, but there is general agreement that more than one wife is not permitted
for the
purpose of satisfying one's lust.
But part
of the attraction
of Whitehead
for me is that he clarifies
questions of value and their relation to fact, and strongly supports the subordination
of economic values to larger
purposes.
The Psalm does not
question the relationship
of David and Mount Zion to all Israel3 In its moods
of deepest despair, the Old Testament story finds hope
for the future
of all Israel in the certainty that God would realize his
purpose in the David - Zion covenant with the re-establishment
of that rule in some form.
Perhaps pursuit
of the maximal human creativity should be constrained by the following principle
of environmental respect: A
purpose that reduces natural creativity relative to some alternative
for the decision in
question is a violation
of the maximal divine good unless the
purpose is required in order to maximize human creativity in the long run.8 All implications considered, I expect that maximizing human creativity itself includes adherence to this principle.
For instance, there are the hermeneutical
questions of whether the image
of Christ emerging through the glasses
of Islamic mysticism is what the Bible or Biblical authors «intended»; If the
purpose of the crystallization
of the supposed authorial intention or
purpose is to connect the ancient and the present «viewpoints» or the worldviews, one may ask if such a possibility
of a pure state
of intention possible to extract at all, or is it not that the reader often always creates» at least some elements
of the supposed «intentions».
«Prayer,» as The Westminster Shorter Catechism puts it in matchless simplicity, «is an offering up
of our desires unto God,
for things agreeable to his will...» (
Question 98) It is the attempt to become consciously aware
of God's presence, to discover his will
for our lives, to surrender our vagrant thoughts and self - centered desires to his controlling
purpose, and to find in him power
for living.
For some twenty - somethings, this is also a time when the
questioning of purpose begins.
These are all important
questions for determining the view
of freedom and necessity, the power
of the gods, and so on in the world
of the Iliad, but it is not my
purpose to enter into them here.
But the system is not the
purpose for his doing so» and it is on the
question of purpose that Pollock's Franz Rosenzweig and the Systematic Task
of Philosophy goes so wrong.
The why in one instance refers to cause, in the other to
purpose; and an answer to one
of these
questions will not do
for the other.
He considers it entirely appropriate
for biologists to be concerned not only with how biological traits came about but also with what specific organic features are
for, even though most scientists and philosophers
of science place
questions of purpose outside the realm
of research.
The apparent
purpose of this series
of questions was to trap Jesus into a premature and public avowal
of his messiahship, and thus into an act
of blasphemy
for which he could be arrested.
It follows that a theology
of God's activity in history is inadequate if it denies or slights the
question of his
purposes for nations and institutions.
I do take issue, however, with Hancock when he states that the natural sciences are «
for the most part... safely insulated from the
questions of ultimate
purpose that condition our understanding
of the meaning
of education.»