Sentences with phrase «for radiation balance»

Moreover, the loss of sea ice would have altered the planetary albedo, causing the planet to warm until clouds cover had increased enough for the radiation balance at the TOA to be restored.

In reply to How to download hourly data for radiation balance components by Moses Monday (not verified)

If that was true, then the local / regional variations are of interest for the radiation balance.

In that survey, it was almost universal that groups tuned for radiation balance at the top of the atmosphere (usually by adjusting uncertain cloud parameters), but there is a split on pratices like using flux corrections (2 / 3rds of groups disagreed with that).

Not exact matches

[Response: The way the radiation is written in the Uvic model — which is typical for energy balance models of this sort — you can dial in whatever sensitivity parameter you want.

And for a vegan bodybuilder who must unfortunatelly play tetris with the food sources that he choses in order to give to his body the right ammounts of aminos, restricting SPI and soy foods so much does not make his goal any easier.There are sometimes that you need a meal thats complete with aminos and soy provides that meal with the additional benefits of lacking the saturated fats trans cholesterol and other endothelium inflammatory factors.I'm not saying that someone should go all the way to 200gr of SPI everyday or consuming a kilo of soy everyday but some servings of soy now and then even every day or the use of SPI which helps in positive nitrogen balance does not put you in the cancer risk team, thats just OVERexaggeration.Exercise, exposure to sunlight, vegan diet or for those who can not something as close to vegan diet, fruits and vegetables which contains lots of antioxidants and phtochemicals, NO STRESS which is the global killer, healthy social relationships, keeping your cortisol and adrenaline levels down (except the necessary times), good sleep and melatonin function, clean air, no radiation, away from procceced foods and additives like msg etc and many more that i can not even remember is the key to longevity.As long as your immune system is functioning well and your natural killer cells TP53 gene and many other cancer inhibitors are good and well, no cancer will ever show his face to you.With that logic we shouldn't eat ANY ammount of protein and we should go straight to be breatharians living only with little water and sunlight exposure cause you like it or not the raise of IGF1 is inevitable i know that raise the IGF1 sky high MAYBE is not the best thing but we are not talking about external hormones and things like this.Stabby raccoon also has a point.And even if you still worry about the consumption of soy... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21711174.

However, the other terms in the energy balance directly or indirectly affect the amount of absorbed solar radiation which is available for ablation.

Perhaps there is room for more indicators inspired by the «big picture physics», such as the planetary energy balance and the outgoing long - wave radiation (OLR).

What happens at the «top of atmosphere» — the level where outgoing radiation leaves for space, not itself a very easy concept — is the restoration of equilibrium, the increase in temperature that, through Helmholtz - Boltzmann at the Earth's brightness temperature 255K, restores the balance between incoming and outgoing energies.

Just to quickly interject a little help for Gavin: The Stephan - Boltzman argument applies to the «top of atmosphere» exchange of, and balance of radiation.

While there is good data over the last century, there were many different changes to planet's radiation balance (greenhouse gases, aerosols, solar forcing, volcanoes, land use changes etc.), some of which are difficult to quantify (for instance the indirect aerosol effects) and whose history is not well known.

Thank the Bush Administration for shooting down the radiation - balance satellite proposed by NASA to precisely measure the global warming problem, or non-problem, as those who shot down the satellite insist.

Pekka Pirilä: Where the effect of increase in CO2 is important for the energy balance is in the upper troposphere, because a significant part of the radiation emitted upwards by CO2 of the upper troposphere goes trough the tropopause to stratosphere or through it to open space.

Where the effect of increase in CO2 is important for the energy balance is in the upper troposphere, because a significant part of the radiation emitted upwards by CO2 of the upper troposphere goes trough the tropopause to stratosphere or through it to open space.

Consequently, we can only derive a temperature from a local radiation balance because the uniform equilibrium temperature for the whole globe has nothing to do with the local radiation balance

This is an energy balance constraint due to the effectiveness of radiation in removing excess surface energy above the balanced state, seen for example just after El Ninos as the surface temperature anomaly cools within a year.

Right, the most significant positive and negative feedbacks because it's the primary driver of the radiation balance for both absorption, reflection and emission, especially if you count the surface - lower troposphere system.

3) In the examination of the model for the GHE above, the initial radiation balance, plus the adiabatic - lapse rate, is what has set the structure of the temperature profile; and then the addition of more GHG to the temperature field causes a radiative imbalance that changes the temperature profile until the imbalance goes away.

For the forced response, I'll use the framework for discussing the transient climate response in post # 4 in which the forcing is balanced by the radiation to space and heat uptake, both of which are assumed to be proportional tFor the forced response, I'll use the framework for discussing the transient climate response in post # 4 in which the forcing is balanced by the radiation to space and heat uptake, both of which are assumed to be proportional tfor discussing the transient climate response in post # 4 in which the forcing is balanced by the radiation to space and heat uptake, both of which are assumed to be proportional to:.

The job of the radiation module is to calculate the solar heating rate profiles and the thermal cooling rate profiles, including the energy deposition at the ground surface, as well as the energy balance at the top of the atmosphere for the specified climate variable distribution at each grid box.

For an equilibrium climate, global mean outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) necessarily balances the incoming absorbed solar radiation (ASR), but with redistributions of energy within the climate system to enable this to happen on a global basis.

You can come up with numbers like 7 C by seeing how much effect removing CO2 has on the outgoing radiation, which is 27 W / m2 for a standard sounding, equating to needing 7 degrees cooling to restore the balance.

Surface temperature must therefore increase, just enough for the LW radiation that is rejected to space at TOA to balance the SW radiation that is absorbed.

(1) Using physics: Palmer et at (2001) Importance of the deep ocean for estimating decadal changes in Earth's radiation balance, in GRL Vol 38, L13707, doi: 10.1029 / 2011GL047835 (2) Using observations: von Schuckmann et al (2001) How well can we derive Global Ocean Indicators from Argo data?

The only comment I agree with is that the shell does not transfer «heat» to the sphere (by definition of heat transfer), but it does cause the sphere to heat up due to the transfer of back radiation energy (you can have energy transfer both ways, but heat transfer only refers to NET energy transfer), and this requires a higher sphere equilibrium temperature for a given energy net transfer for net energy balance.

An increase in net energy input to the ITCZ in a perturbed climate (via reduced outgoing longwave radiation due to increased carbon dioxide concentrations, for example) means that, for energetic balance, the circulation and vertical velocity in the ITCZ must strengthen in order to export the excess energy (assuming the gross moist stability in the ITCZ is positive and constant).

Axel Kleidon and Maik Renner of the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry in Jena, Germany, used a simple energy balance model to determine how sensitive the water cycle is to an increase in surface temperature due to a stronger greenhouse effect and to an increase in solar radiation.

For instance, if the outgoing and incoming radiation are balanced at 270 ppm, then let's guess WHAT YEAR they said the incoming radiation was 343 / w / m ^ 2 and outgoing was 103?

They combined simple energy balance considerations with a physical assumption for the way water vapour is transported, and separated the contributions of surface heating from solar radiation and from increased greenhouse gases in the atmosphere to obtain the two sensitivities.

Certain things come out of it easily, such as the concept of black body radiation and balance of energy flux with energy density in a cavity (for example).

For a stable climate, the sunlight absorbed by the planet must be balanced by thermal infra - red radiation emitted to space.»

Your arbitrary separation of DLR and DSR into components split between radiation and convection is unnecessary for the energy balance calculation.

But for energy balance considerations, R (radiation), L (latent heat) and E (sensible heat) can only be «funded» by S & DLR.

In addition, observational records are available for surface temperature (space - based monitoring, in situ monitoring, and proxy data) and the radiation balance at the top of the atmosphere.

The pioneer radiation balance model incorporating aerosols was Freeman and Liou (1979); for cloudiness data they cite Telegdas and London (1954).

It is the physical basis for calculating and analyzing the radiation energy balance of Earth.

more carbon dioxide in the lower atmosphere means more little «point sources» for more absorbed EM in the infrared part of the spectrum, (infrared that re-radiated from the earth's surface after sunlight hit it and got absorbed); and since point sources radiate in a spherical pattern, that means more «back radiation» to earth, on balance... and this changes the «standing pattern» of energy flow in and out of the earth system, creating a time differential, so it starts to re-adjust...

There certainly are, the energy balance is done at the surface of «h», and the area is the same for both outgoing and incoming radiation, «Ac», since «h» is immersed in «c».

That is determined by consideration of the absorption of the atmosphere of terrestrial radiation (and radiation emitted by the atmosphere), which essentially ends up determining at what altitude the temperature has to be determined via radiative balance between the Earth system (earth + atmosphere) and the sun and space [which for the earth system with its current albedo is ~ 255 K].

The greenhouse effect, by affecting the rate at which the earth emits radiation back out into space for a given surface temperature, causes the earth's temperature to warm in order to maintain radiative balance.

For the Earth's temperature to be in steady state so that the Earth does not rapidly heat or cool, this absorbed solar radiation must be very nearly balanced by energy radiated back to space in the infrared wavelengths.

Where oh where is some evidence for this neat radiation balance?

As of November 2014, there were 14 Earth System Models from 12 centers in eight countries that modeled temperature, soil moisture, and solar radiation at a daily resolution for at least one of the three RCPs (S1 Table)(Note: all Earth System Models that we used include feedbacks of plant production on water balance).

Recently, I have been trying to determine the «physical climate science basis» for the effect of clouds on radiation balance.

«One of the perennial concerns about possibilities for modifying the earth's radiation balance has been that even if these methods could compensate for increased GHGs in the global and annual mean, they might have very different spatial and temporal effects and impact the regional and seasonal climates in a very different way than GHGs.

With sufficient warming, the same radiative transfer equations show that upward IR will rise enough for sufficient quantities to escape to space, albeit at a higher altitude than before, warmed sufficiently so that its IR emissivity allows OLR to balance incoming absorbed radiation.

The top left panel shows the TOA energy balance for the first stasis period 2048 — 2058 for the net radiation (R T), along with the global mean surface temperature perturbation.

Why even waste time doing solutions for the whole earth Cohers — GTA — schmat — it's not how GCMs solve radiation balance.

For a steady - state climate, global mean outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) necessarily balances the incoming absorbed solar radiation (ASR), but with redistributions of energy within the climate system to enable this to happen on a global basis.

Considering that Trenberth and Kiehl in their energy balance diagrams use the term «greenhouse gases» instead of the proper term «atmosphere» as the causative agent for their 324Watts / m ^ 2 «back radiation»; this can not be considered valid science.