Sadly, I am not much farther along in my quest to reorganize my music collection than I was when I asked
for reader responses in 2015.
Not exact matches
A pop - up that asks
for too much information can be off - putting
for many
readers and will likely not get many
responses.
Among the
reader responses: «so basically, attractive women are human pacifiers
for grown ass men»; «I don't even know where to begin with my rage»; «Annnnnnd I'm done with Eli Roth.»
They receive much more
response than texts and have thus become powerful tools
for brands looking to engage their
readers and attract new ones.
We thank
readers for their diverse and sometimes intense
responses to our recent comments about marijuana legalization in California and about the reversal of a US policy.
We thank
readers for their thoughtful
responses to David Blond's guest paper on trade and tariffs, Winners and Losers from Global Trade.
This post
for the Golf Channel,
for example, got more than 10,000 views and 228
responses by asking
readers, «How Would you Alter Your Favorite Sport?»
I do SEO and
for on - page copy rather than focusing on the primary keyword phrase to start, I focus on 2 things, writing
for the
reader and a bit of direct
response copy (i.e. I get the
reader to envision using a product or how to solve their problem — future pacing).
This post has been on my mind from day one and it's also been a topic that was requested by
readers in
response to previous installments in the Safe Withdrawal Rate Series (click here
for Part 1):
In
response to our coordinate efforts
for Mutuality 2012, I have heard from women who say they feel their dignity and worth have been restored, from multiple
readers who have changed their minds about women in ministry, from couples relieved that they can finally put a name to how their relationship has functioned all along, from singles freshly inspired by the «great cloud of witnesses» that surrounds them, from followers of Jesus whose passion
for justice and equality has been renewed, from women ready to «get on with it» and stop asking permission to use their gifts and start unapologetically using them.
Reader -
response criticism thus accounts
for the different understandings of and reactions to the «same» text by different
readers by claiming a necessary place
for the subjective element in reading.
The bulk of academic writing in my discipline is not really writing but a collection of marks on paper put down in
response to similar marks put down in
response to other marks put down in
response to... The authors of these texts do not have a conception of writing as an art, or of the need
for the imagery, inflection, and rhythm that hold open the mind of the
reader so that the thought can slip past them into his soul.
In opposition to narrative criticism, with its focus on the supposedly objective and stable text, and in opposition to structuralism's focus on impersonal and universal codes,
reader -
response criticism arose to argue
for the essential role of the
reader in the process of making meaning.
But that is how more than one
reader interpreted my
response to Arthur Simon of Bread
for the World in the December 1999 issue.
Perhaps the first
readers of the gospel were expected to learn from the immediacy of the
response here: no time
for excuses.
I was impressed with how the initial commenter responded — with an apology and an eagerness to learn more — and
for the most part, her follow - up questions were met with equally gracious
responses from gay
readers.
Yet more evidence of the counter questioning spirit is the recent proposal in the pages of this journal
for a postmodern theology of identity (William H. Willimon, «Answering Pilate: Truth and the Postliberal Church» [January 28, 1987]; see also
Readers»
Response, «A Challenge to Willimon's Postliberalism» [April 1, 1987]-RRB-.
... wow, lot's of mis - statements here by people speculating about the Bible and Jesus, including those of you who think the books of the Bible were written a few hundred years ago (Moses penned it around 1400BC)... the Bible is a collection of the most investigated writings of all time, so there is a tremendous amount of credible archeological and scientific material in this world available
for review rooted in verifiable investigations... my
response, read the Bible, do your own investigation, determine the Truth
for yourself... hopefully, anne rice's denouncement of faith in the God of the Bible (it's difficult
for me to believe she ever had Saving Faith in the first place) will bring some
readers to investigate and find the Truth... God will call the Elect, not one more, not one less...
Truly enough, the Lord in His Matthew 12
response MIGHT only be issuing a strong warning
for all of His hearers (and
readers!)
This passage not only has direct bearing on Fish's brilliant
reader -
response thesis, but also helps explain why, in a sense, the Romantics have a point about Milton belonging to the Devil's party without quite realizing it;
for according to St. Ignatius» Rules
for the Discernment of Spirits quoted above, that also holds true
for everyone.
Lo & behold, I am also very thankful
for the many suggestions your
readers offered in the
responses above and the fact that you are persevering in your efforts to do more research in this area make me so very proud of you — you are a darling!
This is my stock
response when a
reader hysterically blames a failed recipe on me, as all of the recipes in my book and on my blog are tested, and work if made as written: «So sorry it turned out that way
for you.
ETA in
response to
reader requests: If you've got nut allergy issues (in your family or at school), swap the almond butter
for sunbutter, and the sliced almonds
for a bit more rolled oats and quinoa.
A well written
response, and I just want to say that I do (as I'm sure every other
reader does) appreciate having such a platform
for discussion.
That reply may have been tongue - in - cheek, but if you can imagine a minute what the
response will be on justarsenal if we DID lose, there will probably be a lot of
readers calling
for Wenger's head and saying that the players really should be shot!
Please just consider that saying less might be a more
for you, and sticking to one or two clear points without drawing major conclusions might get you a better
response from other
readers.
Corriere dello Sport in Italy asked it's
readers, and their
response was unequivocal, with 55 percent going
for Ronaldo, 24 percent
for Ribery and just 19 percent
for Messi.
response is that the online momentum
for food issues among parents is amazing; the advocacy work that mom bloggers and dad bloggers and non-parent bloggers are doing is incredible; the title «mom blogger» is fine
for moms who want that title but not
for those who don't; and dads with blogs should be better recognized by
readers and media
for the role that parenting plays in their advocacy.
«Pantley applies succinct solutions to dozens of everyday - problem scenarios — from backtalk to dawdling to lying to sharing to screaming — as guides
for readers to fashion their own
responses.
Thank you, Dear Abby, and thanks to each and every one of your
readers for their incredible
response to Operation Dear Abby III and America Remembers.
I wasn't concerned with this at first, but when their need
for the pacifier began interfering with their sleep habits, I began reading your blogs and the other
reader responses on pacifiers, CIO, 45 - minute intruder, etc..
In
response, make sure your content is organized such that it's easy
for readers to find their way around (cf. navigability).
As one of those working on this project, I would like to set out the questions it is raising, put the call out
for responses and invite
readers to attend the two public debates we are holding after our evidence - gathering phase, which runs until the end of March.
Reader response to the article was overwhelming, with many thanking Ehrenberg
for her well - balanced approach and other
readers still not convinced of the story's conclusions.
I find the posts (and
responses) are best when the
reader gets clear explanations of the current understanding of climate phenomena (with the associated uncertainties) and links to sources
for further reading.
Since you are clearly extremely intelligent and know exactly what you're writing about only one reason can exist
for so peculiar a disconnect between
reader questions and «your» reply: you have helper elves in your office who handle many of the
responses.
While looking
for something else, I found this recent
response on another topic: http://www.wheatbellyblog.com/2011/10/this-is-your-brain-on-wheat/comment-page-2/#comment-169364 in which the
reader reported an apparent direct correlation between fluoridated water exposure and thyroid problems.
This post is in
response to a
reader asking me to write a couple posts on packing
for vacation — short and long trips, etc... Thanks
for the request Kit, it gave me a lot to think about as I packed
for this month away!
Since I had an overwhelming
response from
readers after this post requesting more layered looks
for the office, I have decided to try & incorporate some work - appropriate outfits here on a regular basis.
Vikkramm said the diverse
responses he heard from his
readers inspired him to write a book called «Tell Me Honey... 2000 Questions
for Couples.»
The
reader's
response to my email is Love notes that print one of my answers on a sticky note was Printables Designed by Carisa @ Messes to Memories Exclusively
for The Dating
After a couple of days in post-screening limbo, the reviews
for «The
Reader» are in, and while there's much praise
for the film, I suspect the
response may not be quite what Harvey Weinstein was hoping
for.
Faithful
readers may note my
response to the 2016 Deadpool was a receptive but not entirely impressed lukewarm and
for audiences who just couldn't catch on to the verbose nastiness of that film, there is no conversion therapy awaiting you in the sequel.
In
response to our Editor's Letter (Nov / Dec 2011) about the formative role played by novelizations, we received the following letter, a personal account of just how movies fit into life
for one
reader.
This packet includes the following CCSS related items * Websites and questions
for research *
Readers Response * Prefixes / suffixes / roots literacy center (answer key) * Text Structure Task Cards (answer key) * Context clues activity sheet * PBL activity * Persuasive writing organizer * Earth Day themed writing paper
This We're All Wonders book companion includes the following: OVER 30
READER RESPONSE PRINTABLES AND ORGANIZERS 2 BEAUTIFUL COLLABORATIVE POSTES 1 FUN WE»RE ALL WONDERS WRITING CRAFTIVITY (SIX DIFFERENT STYLES) 8 NOTES OF LOVE AND KINDNESS
FOR CLASSROOM USE 1 WONDER STUDENT AWARD I hope this year is the most BEAUTIFUL WONDER FILLED year yet for you and your studen
FOR CLASSROOM USE 1 WONDER STUDENT AWARD I hope this year is the most BEAUTIFUL WONDER FILLED year yet
for you and your studen
for you and your students!
The
reader may be excused
for shaking his or her head, wondering why two polls asking about the same policy should get such different
responses.
Readers can judge
for themselves how satisfying his
response was to concerns about the guidance that reviewers were given and how conflicts have been handled.
The software makes the text a just - right level of challenge
for readers, with immediate feedback (as on the Curriculet articles and TenMarks) on student
responses to questions.
The varied repertoire of case studies with situations faced by teachers, and
for which there is little or no training in teacher preparation programs, is invaluable; the questions presented before the case studies focus the
reader's attention on the details of the case and then place him or her at the center stage of the situation, while the questions presented after the case study facilitate troubleshooting to come up with the best possible
response.