Sentences with phrase «for rear crash protection»

Those that do don't have seat / head restraints rated good for rear crash protection.

Only the Ford Freestar and its twin Mercury Monterey earn good overall ratings for rear crash protection.

Seat / head restraint designs in 22 current car models are rated good for rear crash protection, but those in 53 other cars are rated marginal or poor.

It earned a poor rating in the side test and a marginal rating for rear crash protection.

Those considered «best choices» for under $ 20,000 also have good ratings for side crash protection, good head restraints and seats for rear crash protection, and good roof strength to protect occupants in rollover crashes.

The Fusion without optional side airbags is rated poor for side crash protection, and it earned a marginal rating for rear crash protection.

The Edge also earns a good rating for rear crash protection, so it wins the Institute's 2007 Top Safety Pick award.

This car earns the second - lowest rating of marginal for rear crash protection.

The seat / head restraints in all but three of the cars in this group also have been rated for rear crash protection.

The same goes for Toyota's hybrid Prius, which performed well in the Institute's front and side crash tests but came up short for rear crash protection.

The other 8 models are rated marginal or poor for rear crash protection.

The IIHS rated the Sentra an» «acceptable»» for frontal off - set crash test, a» «poor»» for side impact, and a» «poor»» for rear crash protection and head restraint.

In addition to the top rating for frontal protection, the 2008 Jeep Patriot equipped with available front torso airbags also was rated «Good» for side impact protection and «Acceptable» for rear crash protection.

Not exact matches

Safety The 2012 A6 received a 2012 Top Safety Pick designation from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, reflecting Good overall ratings in the frontal - offset and side - impact crash tests, roof - strength test, and rear - impact neck - protection evaluation.

In 2017, NHTSA plans to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking to amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208, «Occupant crash protection,» to require automobile manufacturers to install a seat belt reminder system for the front outboard passenger and rear designated seating positions in passenger vehicles.

Safety & Reliability The C70 scores the highest rating, Good, in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's frontal offset and side - impact crash tests, as well as for rear - crash protection.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration gave the Altima four stars for frontal crash protection for front passenger and driver, side rear passenger, and rollover protection, and three stars for side driver impact protection.

Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall initiate a rulemaking proceeding to amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard Number 208 (relating to occupant crash protection) to provide a safety belt use warning system for designated seating positions in the rear seat.

This list of these most important and crucial safety aspects of this aristocratic Honda Civic sedan includes driver and passenger side SRS air bags, for enhanced protection in case of a crash, an ABS along with EBD and Brake Assist for proficient braking and handling, front fog lamps for better visibility, adjustable front seat belts with pre-tensioners, a security alarm system for avoiding any unauthorized entry into this sedan, a keyless entry with answer back mode for added protection, an engine immobilizer to avoid thefts, auto door locks for added security of the passengers seated inside, a rear window defogger and defroster to give the driver a clear view of the rear vehicles, all power windows with driver side getting a one touch automatic up / down window with a pinch guard, child proof locks for rear doors for better protection and safety of the children, a day and night internal rear view mirror to avoid the high beams of the other vehicles, a wave key and a dual horn as well.

Weight - optimised and crash - optimised body structure; standard safety fittings include front and side airbags, side curtain airbags, 3 - point automatic belts on all seats, at front with belt tensioners and belt force limiters, twin ISOFIX children's seat attachments at rear and optionally also on the front passenger seat, tyre pressure control and partially active engine compartment lid for optimised pedestrian protection; optimised vehicle weight; excellent acoustic and vibrational comfort; favourable aerodynamic properties.

Just as manufacturers made major improvements in how their vehicles protect people in frontal crashes, now they're making similar improvements for side and rear impact protection.

The Saab and Volvo earn the top rating of good for protection in front, side, and rear crashes, and both models include standard electronic stability control (ESC), which research shows can help drivers avoid crashes.

IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests, a roof strength test for rollover protection, plus evaluations of seats / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.

The seat / head restraints in the Optima are the only ones the Institute tested this time around that earn the top rating of good for occupant protection in rear crashes.

The Saab and Volvo not only provide good protection in high - speed front and side crashes but also have good seat and head restraint designs for protecting against whiplash in rear crashes.»

Now 22 small models, including those the Institute tested previously, earn the award with tougher requirements including a roof strength test, an ESC requirement to help drivers avoid crashes, and a higher bar for rear impact protection.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has been rated «Good», the highest possible rating, for side impact and rear crash protection.

What's more, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety recognized the model with its highest rating of «Good» in the roof - strength, side - impact and moderate - overlap frontal - offset crash evaluations while the model's seat / head restraint design was recognized with a «Good» rating for whiplash protection in the event of rear impacts.

It worked: the Cruze received the highest possible «Good» ratings in front, side, rear and rollover crash protection tests by the U.S. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

IIHS rates vehicles in a moderate overlap front crash, small overlap front crash, side impact and rollover test, and evaluates seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impact collisions.

This reflects the improvements manufacturers have been making in the side and rear crash protection afforded by their newer cars (most vehicles have afforded good occupant protection in frontal crashes for several years).

New features include roof - mounted head curtain side air bags with rollover protection for all seating rows and front - seat safety belt pretensioners that are linked to the vehicle's sensing system to provide segment - exclusive deployment in rear - end crashes.

In the NHTSA side - impact crash tests, the 2001 - 2010 PT Cruiser received four stars for the driver and five stars for the rear passenger protection.

Top Safety Pick recognizes the vehicles that earn the highest ratings for front, side, rollover, and rear crash protection, and that have electronic stability control, which is standard on the 5 series.

IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in a moderate overlap frontal crash, small overlap frontal crash, side impact and rollover, plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.

In the side - impact crash tests, the 2003 - 2006 Mazda 6 without side airbags received three stars for the front and four stars for the rear passenger protection.

The ratings are based on how well they protect passengers in front and side crash tests, in rollovers via a roof strength test, and in simulated rear impacts to evaluate seat and head restraints for protection against neck injuries.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety awarded the Outlander Sport the second - best score of «Acceptable» in the small - overlap frontal - offset crash test and the best grade of «Good» in the moderate - overlap frontal - offset, side - impact, roof - strength and rear - impact (whiplash - protection) crash tests.

IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in a moderate overlap frontal crash, small overlap frontal crash, side impact and rollover, as well as evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.

Active Protection with Attentiveness Assist Airbags: — Airbags for driver and front passenger — Head airbags front and rear — Side airbags for driver and front passenger Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) with Brake Assist Cornering Brake Control (CBC) Dynamic Stability Control (DSC) including Dynamic Traction Control (DTC) Electric parking brake with auto hold Electronic vehicle immobiliser and crash sensor Intergrated emergency spare wheel Hill Descent Control Run flat indicator Side - impact Protection with Attentiveness Assist Airbags: — Airbags for driver and front passenger — Head airbags front and rear — Side airbags for driver and front passenger Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) with Brake Assist Cornering Brake Control (CBC) Dynamic Stability Control (DSC) including Dynamic Traction Control (DTC) Electric parking brake with auto hold Electronic vehicle immobiliser and crash sensor Intergrated emergency spare wheel Hill Descent Control Run flat indicator Side - impact protectionprotection

With a new Active Head Restraint System for front seat passengers, the 2009 RL is anticipated to receive a GOOD rating in IIHS rear crash protection evaluation.

As a result of all these measures, the new Cayenne models comply with all legal requirements for all types of crash protection, including frontal, side, diagonal and rear impact, as well as rollover damage and frontal - or sidepost impact.

ARLINGTON, Va. — The 2017 Lexus IS, a midsize luxury car, qualifies for the highest award from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety after changes were made to improve protection in small overlap front crashes and in rear crashes.

The IIHS rates vehicles on performance in front and side crash tests, a roof strength test, and evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.

The Institute also conducts 40 mph frontal offset crash tests and evaluates vehicles» seat / head restraint designs for protection in rear crashes.

However, the 2014 Fiesta received only two out of five stars for side - crash protection — with four stars for front passengers and two stars for the rear seat due to excessive intrusion into the rear cabin.

Besides, the ease with which the car can be equipped with child retention systems thanks to the rear seat Isofix anchoring points and the possibility of installing a third anchoring point called Top Tether, which prevents the child seat from rotating in the event of a crash placed the new Ibiza in the top ranking positions with 4 Euro NCAP stars for child protection.

And, yesterday, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), announced that the 2006 Rabbit four - door received the Top Safety Pick, Silver award, based on the Institute's frontal offset, side impact, and rear crash protection ratings.

Thirty - four vehicles earn the Institute's top award for 2008 for good protection in front, side and rear crashes and available electronic stability control.

The Institute introduced the Plus award in 2012 to recognize models that achieve «good» or «acceptable» performance in the small - overlap test as well as «good» ratings in each of four other criteria — moderate overlap front crash, side impact and rollover tests, plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.