Not exact matches
«Extending the right to
religious freedom, clearly designed
for an individual
person, to a corporation would have repressive consequences to the American workplace,» says Justin Nelson, president and co-founder
of the National Gay & Lesbian Chamber
of Commerce.
As weddings grew more secular over time, and
people weren't limited to dress codes
of religious buildings, strapless dresses (
for brides, bridesmaids, and guests alike) skyrocketed in popularity.
Indiana's law,
for example, allows
people and businesses to claim exemption based only on the likelihood that their
religious freedom could be infringed, said Katherine Franke, a professor
of law and director
of the Center
for Gender and Sexuality at Columbia University, in New York.
Despite the demonstrable negative consequences in states that have passed laws that undermine LGBTQ equality, the coming months will indicate whether the ascent
of Donald Trump to the White House is emboldening
religious conservatives to press
for more such bills after a series
of gains
for gay and transgender
people at the federal level under the Obama administration.
It is the policy
of Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to provide equal opportunity in employment throughout the corporation
for all qualified applicants and employees without discrimination against any
person because
of a
person's race, color, religion (including
religious dress and grooming practices), sex / gender (including pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions and breast feeding), national origin, ancestry, gender identity, gender expression, legally - protected medical condition, physical or mental disability, age, military or veteran status, marital status, sexual orientation, genetic information or any other basis protected by applicable law.
Walshe also critically flags how — again, at the point
of consent — Facebook's review process deploys examples
of the social aspects
of its platform (such as how it can use
people's information to «suggest groups or other features or products») as a tactic
for manipulating
people to agree to share
religious affiliation data,
for example.
Greed
for power, control, influence, adulation, etc. tend to define the failings
of every
religious person as they sublimate their primate instincts behind a mask
of delusion.
For years, I watched in horror as most
of the most remarkable, honest, hard working, compassionate, productive, contributing & patriotic;
people one could ever hope to know in life & have the privilege
of calling friends; die a slow, agonizing, disfiguring & vastly premature death, amidst the muted joy & exaltation
of conservative
religious groups & individuals.
Such a new ecclesiastical body is designed to allow these pathetic human beings, who are so deeply locked into a world that no longer exists, to form a community in which they can continue to hate gay
people, distort gay
people with their hopeless rhetoric and to be part
of a
religious fellowship in which they can continue to feel justified in their homophobic prejudices
for the rest
of their tortured lives.
To think that some bunch
of people, from one particular
religious sect, can unilaterally decide to say some dead
person is «baptised», and to think that such a declaration means anything at all
for the spirit (if any)
of the deceased, is bizarre.
They managed to deliver tax breaks
for the rich and oil companies, that's indisputable, but not on any
of the «moral» issues they've used since the early 70s to get votes from
religious people.
Mr. Hawking wins easy battles against uneducated (in science)
religious persons, but taking his statement on perspective, He is based on assumptions with serious underlying problems, basically everything from mathematics, to the incompatibility
of quantum mechanics and relativity, and the lack
of proof and evidence
for string theories, he is launching a very aggressive statement, probably his last effort on life to counter the anthropomorphic ideas
of God, and this is very common in all scientists.
But I do think that black
religious leaders have a responsibility, if they can not support gay marriage, to at least support and fight
for the secular rights
of gay
people.
The more educated one becomes the less
religious one is... when you see educated politicians and professional
people of all kinds talking religiousness it's lip service
for the ignorant... it's part
of their job... other wise there's trouble from the little
people.
I think that our children's children will look back at history and see the cause
of the AIDS epidemic in America
for what it was... not just the result
of unprotected sex between promiscuous gay men... but the result
of religious and social persecution
of gay
people that pushed them into unhealthy lifestyles and expression
of their sexuality.
When atheists begin a debate with a
religious person, it's because the atheists are bullies who have no respect
for the beliefs
of others.
Tell me, if the school charged the actual market value
for the use
of this space and the use
of equipment, etc. and if that market value actually reflected the cost to the public, then the issue might become clearer to you because these
religious people would scream at having to pay full price and the cost
of any damages they may inflict upon the public property they are using illegally.
How much hatred is shown on here
for people with
religious beliefs, and the hatred is spouted in the name
of tolerance and equality.
For now there are many religious sects / denominations due to man - made doctrines and people who believe but are too lazy to read the word and seek God for themselves so they hook themselves to a sect / denomination and are taught the leaders belief system instead of the pure wo
For now there are many
religious sects / denominations due to man - made doctrines and
people who believe but are too lazy to read the word and seek God
for themselves so they hook themselves to a sect / denomination and are taught the leaders belief system instead of the pure wo
for themselves so they hook themselves to a sect / denomination and are taught the leaders belief system instead
of the pure word.
Let's not forget what and how America was suposedly started as a place
of relgious freedom by the pilgrams (according to so called american history books) these
religious people proceeded to rob & kill the Indians who saved their lives, take & kill Mexicans
for land & gold & oil enslave a whole group
of people as property
for financial gain all under the guise
of being good «Christians» (WHITE) and now perceive all «Muslims» (NON-WHITE) are evil unless proven otherwise.
Isn't this what so many
of us don't like about
people who use
religious tradition as a means
for explaining their behavior... they're not CONSISTENT?
I will no longer temper my understanding
of truth in order to pretend that I have even a tiny smidgen
of respect
for the appalling negativity that continues to emanate from
religious circles where the church has
for centuries conveniently perfumed its ongoing prejudices against blacks, Jews, women and homosexual
persons with what it assumes is «high - sounding, pious rhetoric.»
Zeus, Venus, Satan, Sheva, Krisna, Jesus, Allah... all embraceable man - made myths
for people too mentally conditioned to honestly consider their own
religious brainwashing, too lazy and / or stupid to actually confront and learn the science
of mother nature, and too empowered / deluded by sectarian association to relocate their nose an inch away from the ass end
of the sheep they follow in single file.
The Christian Right wants public money to be used
for private
religious education (vouchers), buildings and services to be used
for private
religious purposes (this article), and they want subsidies in the form
of tax breaks, special exemptions
of other sorts, and they even want to destroy Aid to Needy Families so they can drive
people into seeking help at their private
religious «missions» where you are not allowed to eat unless you are a Christian, and so on.
For me, it is the leveraging
of this extra layer
of fear due to the
person's
religious upbringing that makes the advice abusive in nature.
That is how difficult it is
for a
religious person to enter into the kingdom
of God.
It is very like, as with 99.9 %
of religious people, believe what's in the bible
for a single reason — you were taught to.
A better strategy would be to point out how one doesn't need religion to be a moral
person, and then demonstrate how some
of the
people that claim to be a beacon
for religious zealots (the GOP) practice an existence devoid
of morality.
The
religious among us keep trying to chip away at the separation
of church and state by making
people recite the pledge
of allegiance with the God clause, installing
religious symbols and displays on public property, holding prayer breakfasts
for politicians, berating the removal
of prayer in public schools, trying to pass laws limiting women's access to birth control, and trying to get an amendment passed outlawing abortion (since in their view God creates a soul the moment a sperm enters an egg).
They are dangerous and not at all conducive to a society
of people working together
for the good
of ALL regardless
of religious belief.
Thanks
for giving voice to so many
of us,
people like myself, who often feel as though we are slogging our way through the
religious wilderness
of fear and judgmentalism.
Stalin didn't kill tens
of millions
of his own
people for religious reasons.
You can't «believe in» God because you don't know
for sure whether God exist (by most
religious people's own admission, I think, though I coud be wrong, but either way its a fact that the existence
of God has not been proven).
Does it not occur to you that chaplains care
for people of ALL
religious backgrounds and beliefs?
G, if my words came out that way I apologize, I don't think that all
religious people are the same, like all groups
of people some are bu ttheads some aren't (that goes
for the non believing community as well).
I have heard deeply thoughtful
religious leaders acknowledge that they came late to an appreciation
of the pandemic, that preconceptions influenced their initial reactions, that some leaders have taken harsh stances (
for example, refusing to bury
people whose families acknowledge that they died
of AIDS), and that their focus on ideal behaviors can obscure what is real and live.
I have to tell you though, some
of religious folks would be a very bad
people if it wasn't
for the «fear
of god» as they already don't know anything about logic.
While taking advatage
of people's faith
for personal reasons is terrible, please do not assume that being
religious means someone is uneducated.
Legally, the county's moratorium may violate a federal law — the
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized
Persons Act — which makes it illegal
for local governments to place a «substantial burden» on houses
of worship and their function.
Well it is true that some
people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow
of his business income... In such case it is either you are
religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard
for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out
of you with tales and stories... There is another type
of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments
for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment
of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents
of public toilets and market places... Some
of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and
for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one
of them or possessed by one
of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...
It echoed Blaine's amendment, but broadened its rejection
of state funding to exclude all
religious bodies: «Neither Congress nor any State shall make any law... taxing the
people of any State, either directly or indirectly,
for the support
of any sect or
religious body or
of any number
of sects or
religious bodies.»
I think a fast from verbosity about religion may help the
religious people to see how religion - free
people may indeed lack nothing, but instead, their «envelope» is just a particular sort
of clothing — not necessary but fun
for them perhaps.
It should actually scare the hell out
of people when someone running
for office declares deep
religious motivation.
A very large part
of most
religious beliefs involves free will and
people are free to work towards affording healthcare,
people and
people can adopt healthy lifestyles which minimize the need
for healthcare and
of course,
people can choose to help others through donations.
It's wrong
for the public restaurant installation to assert its
religious belief particularly much favorable toward Chriatian faith diners; the mood should be like acceptace
of all racial,
religious backgrounds, and particularly
for gay
people not to feel discriminated and hurt!
I am not the most
religious of people, but I do believe in God, and Jesus... but many
people seem to forget that God's SON sacrificied himself
for our sins... in my book, a SON is part
of a FAMILY... God put us on this earth to be
of free will and to make our own way... Love being the biggest part
of that way... we love God and we love Jesus... but we are also all part
of his FAMILY... He made us all to be part
of a unit that has hope and faith and love... we were meant to procreate... so what does it matter if a
person who is dying does not automatically think
of God, but
of their loved ones?
«CSW joins with the
people of India in calling
for justice and
for the fulfilment
of the Prime Minister's promise to put a stop to the harassment
of religious minorities in India.
Why not display other
religious symbols alongside this as a sign
of respect
for the
people of other faiths who also died in the towers?
That is, if Wilson's purely functionalist explanation
of religion were to become widely accepted by
religious people, it would then be rendered false»
for the adaptive features
of religions depend, on Wilson's account, upon
religious people thinking it false that their religions are best understood as adaptive social organisms.
People have been looking
for advantages over their adversaries
for thousands
of years and their first strike, on a
religious basis, is to get their enemy to accept their interpretation.