Sentences with phrase «for religious talk»

We stated there that the eschatological dimension is the foundation for religious talk.

Not exact matches

When a CNN producer talked to him shortly after the London bombings, he boasted that his son's heroism had marked the advent of a 50 - year religious war and demanded $ 5,000 (5,600 euros) for a televised interview.

The more educated one becomes the less religious one is... when you see educated politicians and professional people of all kinds talking religiousness it's lip service for the ignorant... it's part of their job... other wise there's trouble from the little people.

For years Osteen has been dinged by religious critics as a theological lightweight - for talking too much about sunshine and not enough about sFor years Osteen has been dinged by religious critics as a theological lightweight - for talking too much about sunshine and not enough about sfor talking too much about sunshine and not enough about sin.

If the choice between fanaticisms, whether secular or religious, is the only thing on offer, the prospects for democracy are dim and talk about civil war may not be alarmist.

For all those super religious and not so religious folks, it will give you something to talk about in addition to why a huge statue was struck by lightening.

Lets vote for Romney who talks about religious abuse and yet his religion is abusing the religion of others continually... bet he does nt suspend his money to them... they just wait till people are dead then baptise them... this is an extremist religion and not one we want for president

LogicMinded: you're talking about corruption of power, which exists for both religious and non-religious regimes.

also not covered by medical insurance, though some have sliding scales for fees), and - Psychaitrists (medical doctors who have specialized in psychaitry, are able to perscribe medications, and generally are not as focused on talk therapy)- Religious therapists (may, or may not, have professional training)- Community / Volunteer therapy (may, or may not, have professional training)

For example, he talks about the heresies of «justification by faith alone» (p. 237), annihilationism, hyper - preterism (p. 242), Openness of God, and Religious Inclusivism (p. 281).

He writes, for example: «The fact that our author can persistently talk about sacrifice as if it meant a joyless, unwilling and hesitant gift shows that not even the faintest spark of religious inspiration can have glowed in his heart» (p26).

Perhaps, so far in this talk, you've been waiting for me to be more specific about the different types of vocation, such as priesthood, religious life, marriage and the single life.

It's just an age - old attempt to have it both ways; people who are Christian and perceive that others will reject them for being «religious» or «conservative» love this kind of talk because it allows them to distance themselves from the Christian community while still claiming to follow Christ.

Psalm 10: 3 - 4 — This talks about the wicked men, how they do nt have God in their hearts or in their minds, which is a fine piece of scripture but it can hardly be used for either myself or the maker of the video since we both seem to advocate a deep and personal relationship with the Lord rather than letting a group of «religious» people ruin it for you.

It is the ardent search for the new, powerful God - talk that Bonhoeffer yearned for, but thought would be forthcoming only after a period of necessary silence and renewal (at least in those quarters where Christianity was most acculturated and where the experience of the Holocaust and two World Wars shattered the confidence of both Western religious streams and alternative humanisms).

Regardless of who I am voting for I am tired of all the religious talk about the candidates.

In other words, the fact that so many people can be swayed by religious myths and religious dogma helps us understand why the world is so messed up — people can be talked into just about anything, including things that are bad for them.

When talking about his athletic skills, there should NOT be any religious inputs for the sole fact that it will create biased perspectives.

... ive been sick and tired of all the christian religious talk about mores and morality for a number of years... and in my experience, more they talk about how they are soo moral / christian... the bigger the a ********** they really are.

Parents of preschool children sometimes ask for help understanding the religious development of children; they want to know how to talk about God with their children.

To understand this attitude we must go back to the last of his «Talks on Judaism» in which he contrasts the false desire for security of the dogmatists of the law with the «holy insecurity» of the truly religious man who does not divorce his action from his intention.

There is a lot of talk these days about «respect for religious beliefs», but does this really mean that nobody should criticize a religion in any way?

I don't see any good coming from banning religious expressions, however I do believe we need to include ALL religions when we are talking about religious representation for this site.

He spoke of the prestige of science in our culture and the corresponding lack of respect for religion («If it's a science programme it's a documentary, if the subject's politics there's a debate, but a religious programme, unless it's hymns for granny, will have people talking about their feelings»).

Although Altizer was for several years the most talked about theologian in the country, and although his publications even prior to this one had established him as one of the most brilliant religious thinkers of our time, no department of religion in a public university invited him to join.

Plus, talking up religious liberty is likely less of a turnoff for moderate voters than is talk about bans on abortion and gay marriage, traditionally the top concerns of religious conservatives.

«I think a lot of Christian educationalists are concerned about the direction of travel... they are day - in day - out helping to run schools... they don't feel they get much credit for it they feel that instead senior educational figures talk about Christian education and religious education and religious schools as if they are the problem.»

That's a fact so all this talk means nothing, you die and then nothing, best feeling is knowing that for all crazy stuff religious people do the moment they die the realization comes... oh no god!

Keep religion out of politics and when a politician talks about his or her religious beliefs, don't vote for them.

We'll leave behind for a moment that the Christianity of our forefathers looked very different from the Christianity of today's Religious Right (unless you are ready to talk about slavery, separation of Church and state, the Jefferson Bible, and Benjamin Franklin).

So many preachers, speakers and religious personalities have engaged what I think of as the «wussification» of the Gospel, and have turned the Gospel into a side - bar for their faux - evangelical motivational talks.

People on here have talked about how arrogant atheists are for saying there is no god since there is no empirical evidence, but I say the religious people that are out trying to convert people of other faiths to their faith are just as arrogant.

Anyone can acquire a free education if only he solemnly pledges to rule out all talk of God or any religious premise for social change.

I thought it was funny that Obama won the Catholic vote after all that talk about how Catholics need to fight for religious freedom.

Remember, that holding two - way conversations with invisible fairies would generally earn a diagnosis for schizophrenia... it's just that religious nuts get a pass if they are talking to THEIR imaginary fairies.

«If you talk to people who've campaigned around the world for human rights and religious rights, they would say that where we are starting is actually on a path that could lead to the same sort of regimes that are elsewhere in the world, certainly in terms of persecution of Christians,» he said.

Like George Carlin says, the religious are always talking about the sancti - ty of life for the unborn, but once your here F - you your one your own.

Just because we aren't talking about debate questions or party platforms on Facebook doesn't mean we stop standing up for the unborn, raising our voices for religious liberty, caring for refugees, pursuing racial reconciliation, and more.

But today, for reasons discussed in earlier chapters, it is simply a widespread cultural phenomenon that for increasing numbers the God - talk and religious language in which the church proclaims her message possesses little or no reality.

At this stage it would be appropriate to invoke the idea of «universal intent» Newbigin talks about, for religious encounters of the kind I have just described will require commitment to truth and to the task of witness.

I have seen several people here talk about «what does it hurt to let Christians or other religious faiths believe what they want» and slam the atheists and agnostics for getting in the faces of believers.

If it's so boring for Christians to talk about our beliefs, why are you still reading religious articles?

CSW's Chief Executive, Mervyn Thomas, said: «CSW is urging the US government to raise the issue of widespread hate campaigns by state and non-state actors against religious minorities in talks with Prime Minister Modi, and to insist that justice is done for the victim - survivors of violence against religious minorities.»

A friend of mine in Germany, a broadcaster of religious programs, once commented rather plaintively: «Is it asking too much when one asks the parson just for once, just once, to talk as a normal man to normal men, brief and to the point, without mincing matters, in a natural tone of voice, almost as in a friendly conversation?»

Instead, the order entitled «Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty» professes to extend political speech protections for pastors and religious organizations, aiming to let them talk about politics withoutReligious Liberty» professes to extend political speech protections for pastors and religious organizations, aiming to let them talk about politics withoutreligious organizations, aiming to let them talk about politics without penalty.

In Obama's interview with ABC this week, in which he announced his personal support for same - sex marriage, the president talked about squaring his decision with his personal religious faith.

And that's why religious people talk about FAITH, ie / have faith in that for which there is no proof.

I wonder who is going to start up a collection to buy a truckload of Depends for Bill Donohue, «president» of the Catholic League for Civil and Religious Rights (talk about a completely phony group monicker!).

Folks talk about the soul as a religious item — that it synonymous with religion — But religions don't really explain what a soul is — because they don't know — only a possible destination — Before you get all huffy, please consider where my concept comes from — I am no longer religious — I studied Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs for dozens of years, and determined a different design, for what the glyphs could portend — and found some interesting thought processes hidden within — including what the soul is — for instance: The Ankh symbol represents Life — the charcters for An and kh, I translate as an = thought and kh = soul — Thus Life = the thought of the soul — The soul as described by the AE, is a continuity between 2 or more enti - ties — including the enti - ty Environment — Our environment creates us — some name their environment as god — some believe there is a continuity with their environment — that is soul --

Instead of just having Christians talk about other religious traditions, chapter 9 allows some Buddhists to speak for themselves.