After moving dramatically to abolish property taxes as a source of funding for the schools, lawmakers last year decided to give voters a choice
for replacing the lost revenues: either a two - cent sales - tax increase, to be considered in a March 15 referendum, or an income - tax hike, which will go into effect automatically if the sales - tax rise is rejected.
Not exact matches
Many of the same warnings Mario Cuomo heard in the 1980s about Shoreham are the same ones his son hears today from supporters of Indian Point: Closing a nuclear plant will result in blackouts, a less reliable electric grid and increased air pollution as fossil fuels are burned to
replace the
lost emissions - free nuclear power; customers could face higher bills; more than 1,000 jobs will be
lost, and tax
revenue for schools and towns will dissipate.
Replacing income taxes with am employer payroll tax, leaving Washington, not Albany, on the hook
for billions of dollars in
lost revenue, might sound good, but the idea floated by the governor is already running headlong into a barrage of practical questions about how precisely such a switcheroo might work.
So, he makes this rule and then when banks look
for ways to
replace the billions in
lost revenues, he criticizes them.
After the new overdraft law last year restricted banks from collecting overdraft fees, which happened to be one of their major income sources, banks are looking
for other ways to make up the
lost revenue, one of them is eliminating free checking and
replacing it with one that either has monthly maintenance fee or requires a high account balance to avoid such fee.
Best would be to continue the funds that have been granted by Congress to
replace the
lost revenue due to the virtual end of logging on these federal lands (a portion of
revenue paid by the feds to compensate
for lost property tax
revenue since federal lands aren't subject to state property taxes).