The basic premise behind the strategy is that companies have three options
for returning cash to shareholders — dividends, share buybacks, and paying down debt.
Now share buybacks aren't necessarily a bad thing, and in fact are Warren Buffett's preferred method
for returning cash to shareholders — as opposed to dividends — because they give management more flexibility.
Not exact matches
Buying back stock is,
for example, Warren Buffett's preferred way of
returning cash to shareholders (rather than paying a dividend).
Today, Apple got credit
for its bountiful buyback plans, but there are tons of other companies
returning huge slugs of
cash to their
shareholders and I think you'll miss out if you ignore them,» the «Mad Money» host concluded.
Corporations will boost sales and keep margins elevated allowing managements
to both invest
for growth and
return cash to shareholders via buybacks and dividends.
(Reuters)- Murphy Oil Corp (MUR.N) said it will spin off its smaller retail gasoline business in the United States, review options
for other assets, pay a special dividend and buy back shares as it seeks
to return more
cash to shareholders.
For instance, a percentage of GE executive bonuses depend on the company
returning a certain amount of
cash to shareholders.
Peltz also proposed cutting other «excess» costs, adding debt, adopting a more
shareholder - friendly policy
for distributing
cash from CyclicalCo / CashCo, prioritizing high
returns on invested capital
for initiatives at GrowthCo, and introducing more
shareholder - friendly governance, including tighter alignment between executive compensation and
returns to shareholders.
Activist investors and institutional
shareholders are increasingly forcing publicly held companies
to return more
cash to shareholders — and that's good
for the economy.
If you want companies
to return less money
to shareholders, then you should be able
to defend an alternative choice
for what they should do instead with their
cash.
Let's further assume that the Nikkei companies in the aggregate have a net
cash balance equal
to 30 % of market capitalization and decide
to return all the net
cash to shareholders as a special dividend, the implied P / E multiple
for the Nikkei would drop from 8x
to 5x.
And with a payout ratio of 47.8 %, you're looking at what's basically a «perfect balance» between retaining earnings
for company growth and
returning cash to shareholders.
As one of the most diversified healthcare companies with 12 megabrands, including Johnson's, Band - Aid, and Neutrogena, that are sold across 60 countries, J&J looks well poised
to grow earnings,
cash flows, and
shareholder returns for years
to come.
The book is a series of case studies that describes how a small number of CEOs have used
cash generative businesses as platforms
to drive massive
returns for shareholders by directing excess
cash opportunistically between large stock buybacks, special dividends and acquisitions of other businesses.
That's business as usual
for Texas Instruments, which aims
to return essentially 100 % of its free
cash flows directly
to shareholders.
«2014 was a great year
for Marriott Vacations Worldwide, with adjusted EBITDA of $ 200 million, adjusted free
cash flow of nearly $ 300 million and over $ 210 million of capital
returned to our
shareholders.
Stronger iPhone prices and hints by Apple Inc on Thursday that it could
return more than half of its $ 285 billion in
cash to shareholders eased concerns among investors, even as the world's biggest technology company gave a disappointing revenue outlook
for the current quarter.
A vow
to return 6.75 bln euros
to shareholders is handy: Vivendi had been too vague about plans
for its huge
cash pile.
«We recognize activist investors often advocate
for firms
to return excess
cash to shareholders via buybacks,» Goldman's chief strategist David J. Kostin and others said in a note
to clients.
The finding appears
to extend
to the macroeconomic level as well —
shareholders in the larger economy got a much bigger bang
for their buck when
cash was
returned to them as dividends than when it was deployed into capital expenditure.
But the interesting thing is that in the eyes of many investors, Apple's quarterly iPhone sales numbers seem
to matter less now than they have
for years — at least relative
to how much
cash Apple is generating and
returning to shareholders through dividends and stock buybacks.
«The Company will effectively become a well capitalised
cash shell with approximately # 18 million that can be utilised
for new opportunities in line with our proposed investing policy or
returned to shareholders.»
Naturally,
shareholders would prefer
to reinvest a business's earnings into more ownership of a business rather than see the
cash sit in the company's bank accounts
for a paltry.5 % annual
return.
Dividends are the most widely understood method
for companies
to return cash to shareholders, but share buybacks and debt reduction are also methods
for returning cash.
He also sees opportunities in these sectors
for capital allocation that can enhance
shareholder returns, either by using excess free
cash flow
to buy back stock, or acquire competitors and operate the combined company more efficiently.
Clearly, the large
cash holdings of banks and the need
to generate adequate
returns for shareholders is encouraging risk taking.
And with a payout ratio of 47.8 %, you're looking at what's basically a «perfect balance» between retaining earnings
for company growth and
returning cash to shareholders.
Is that a good value
for shareholders, maybe not if a company burns through all it's
cash only
to have the share price
return to normalcy.
For example, at the end of 2016, General Dynamics had a $ 60 billion backlog representing nearly two years worth of sales, helping
to ensure relatively predictable
cash flow that can be
returned to shareholders in the form of buybacks and quickly growing dividends.
All very well, I confess I've been through all that myself professionally, but always felt frustrated at having giant hoards of
Cash on hand
to invest — in an ideal world, I knew the best thing
for shareholders and
Return on Equity was
to have zero
Cash and just come in each day and draw down / pay down on a Debt / CP facility.
In other words don't count on that
cash being
returned to shareholders or even invested in passive investments (private or public equity)
for the benefit of
shareholders; A liquidation valuation really isn't of interest here as Glassbridge is set
to be an ongoing business and I can see an operating
cash bleed
for 3 - 5 years depending on how long it takes the company
to attract enough AUM
to cover operating (read staffing) costs.
For shareholders looking to close the value gap the best outcome, of course, would be for management to return any cash from a refinancing in the form of a dividend or share buyba
For shareholders looking
to close the value gap the best outcome, of course, would be
for management to return any cash from a refinancing in the form of a dividend or share buyba
for management
to return any
cash from a refinancing in the form of a dividend or share buyback.
The strong growth and
cash flow from Humira, the continued development of their drug pipeline, and management's commitment
to returning capital
to shareholders through dividends has increased our estimate of fair value
for the company and changed our holding period from one year
to multiple years.
Dividend payout ratio is the method by which you can know what portion of net income a company is
returning to its
shareholders, and how much retaining
for growth, debt pay off and
cash reserve.
The crux of the idea is that it is a company with a strong brand name and large market share that produces high ROIC and stable free
cash flow and has a majority owner committed
to returning that
cash flow
to shareholders, all
for a single digit multiple.
As it stands, KGP /
shareholders effectively earn nothing from this
cash — but if this
cash,
for example, were
returned tomorrow morning
to shareholders, there's no reason
to believe that would negatively affect Kingspan's P / S multiple (or its financial strength), and
shareholders would have an additional 212 M
cash to re-invest (or invest elsewhere).
[Of course, in general, this & other potential risks offer more compelling reasons
for excess
cash to be
returned to shareholders].
If a company's financially strong, gross
cash these days is a non-productive asset that could be
returned to shareholders, or used
for an earnings - enhancing acquisition.
Time
for a step - change... Overall, it's a pretty stable core business, so management needs
to start milking it
for cash to return to shareholders (via dividends / buy - backs), or else accelerate growth by ramping up its leverage & acquisition pipeline / spending (more acquisitions, bigger acquisitions, or both...)-- at this point, I'd still prefer a bet on the latter.
All these look good
for Kingspan, so if they utilised their «surplus»
cash on an acquisition (
for example), I see no risk / impairment
to the business (& no impact on their usual working capital cycle)-- and obviously the
return for shareholders should be far superior
to an effective zero rate on idle
cash!
Cash & Share Buyback / Tenders: Consider the scale of the potential cash generation implied above, and Donegal's equally large discount to intrinsic value... A strategy of shrinking their outstanding share count is often the simplest & best way for companies to utilize cash, return capital & enhance shareholder va
Cash & Share Buyback / Tenders: Consider the scale of the potential
cash generation implied above, and Donegal's equally large discount to intrinsic value... A strategy of shrinking their outstanding share count is often the simplest & best way for companies to utilize cash, return capital & enhance shareholder va
cash generation implied above, and Donegal's equally large discount
to intrinsic value... A strategy of shrinking their outstanding share count is often the simplest & best way
for companies
to utilize
cash, return capital & enhance shareholder va
cash,
return capital & enhance
shareholder value.
For example, a company with excess cash of $ 3 billion that shareholders do not expect to have returned for four years is worth just over $ 2 billion today at 10 % discount ra
For example, a company with excess
cash of $ 3 billion that
shareholders do not expect
to have
returned for four years is worth just over $ 2 billion today at 10 % discount ra
for four years is worth just over $ 2 billion today at 10 % discount rate.
We've been following AVGN (see archived posts here)
for exactly the reason that Pollack identifies: it's a net
cash stock (i.e. it's trading at less than the value of its
cash after deducting all liabilities) and specialist biotechnology activist fund BVF has been pushing it
to liquidate and
return its
cash to shareholders.
For instance, Agrium's expansion at its flagship Vanscoy potash operation will eventually add 40 %
to its capacity, and the completion of the $ 2 billion project means more free
cash flow will be available
to return to shareholders.
February marked a great start of the year
for dividend growth investors as companies lay out the financial plans
for the year and start
returning more
cash to shareholders.
They can
return money
to shareholders, reinvest
for growth, pay off debt, or increase
cash balances.
Oftentimes this is justified
for reasons that go beyond maximizing
cash flow — lots of companies would do better
to return profits
to shareholders than pursue management fantasies
for which the company is fundamentally unsuited — but I'm not sure Qualcomm falls in that category.
Paul Ingrassia, managing director
for Citigroup Global Markets Inc., estimates of the $ 85 billion in REIT deals closed in 2005 and 2006,
returning $ 30 billion in
cash to shareholders.