It is not, instead we get absurdly high probabilities
for runaway warming.
There are continuing major questions about the future of the great ice sheets of Greenland and West Antarctica; the thawing of vast deposits of frozen methane; changes in the circulation patterns of the North Atlantic; the potential
for runaway warming; and the impacts of ocean carbonization and acidification.
That doesn't mean that we shouldn't reduce our dependence on fossil fuels as soon as possible, be it more for geopolitical reasons and pollution reduction than for fear
for a runaway warming...
Not exact matches
«
For anyone driven crazy by the faux warm and fuzzy PR of the so - called sharing economy Steven Hill's Raw Deal: How the «Uber Economy» and Runaway Capitalism Are Screwing American Workers should be required reading... Hill is an extremely well - informed skeptic who presents a satisfyingly blistering critique of high tech's disingenuous equating of sharing with profiteering... Hill includes two chapters listing potential solutions for the crises facing U.S. workers... Hill stresses the need for movement organizing to create a safety net strong enough to save the millions of workers currently being shafted in venture capital's brave new world.&raq
For anyone driven crazy by the faux
warm and fuzzy PR of the so - called sharing economy Steven Hill's Raw Deal: How the «Uber Economy» and
Runaway Capitalism Are Screwing American Workers should be required reading... Hill is an extremely well - informed skeptic who presents a satisfyingly blistering critique of high tech's disingenuous equating of sharing with profiteering... Hill includes two chapters listing potential solutions
for the crises facing U.S. workers... Hill stresses the need for movement organizing to create a safety net strong enough to save the millions of workers currently being shafted in venture capital's brave new world.&raq
for the crises facing U.S. workers... Hill stresses the need
for movement organizing to create a safety net strong enough to save the millions of workers currently being shafted in venture capital's brave new world.&raq
for movement organizing to create a safety net strong enough to save the millions of workers currently being shafted in venture capital's brave new world.»
But rather than suggest that supporters donate money or
warm clothing directly to OWS, the WFP — which has done its best to bleed city residents dry with high taxes and
runaway public - employee pension benefits — told the e-mail's recipients that «just $ 5 a month supports our fight
for a better New York.»
It may seem surprising to people, but you can look at something like Mars, which has a very thin atmosphere, and you can look at something like Venus which we tend to think of as sort of having this rather heavy, clouded atmosphere, which [is] hellishly
warm because of
runaway greenhouse effect, and on both of those planets you are seeing this phenomenon of the atmosphere leaking away, is actually what directly has led to those very different outcomes
for those planets; the specifics of what happened as the atmosphere started to go in each case [made] all the difference.
It all makes grim reading
for those hoping to limit CO2 emissions and prevent
runaway global
warming.
This chemical weathering process is too slow to damp out shorter - term fluctuations, and there are some complexities — glaciation can enhance the mechanical erosion that provides surface area
for chemical weathering (some of which may be realized after a time delay — ie when the subsequent
warming occurs — dramatically snow in a Snowball Earth scenario, where the frigid conditions essentially shut down all chemical weathering, allowing CO2 to build up to the point where it thaws the equatorial region, at which point
runaway albedo feedback drives the Earth into a carbonic acid sauna, which ends via rapid carbonate rock formation), while lower sea level may increase the oxidation of organic C in sediments but also provide more land surface
for erosion... etc..
The left - wing focus on the fantasy of
runaway global
warming takes all their attention off the real pollution — air, water and land pollution in China, India and other parts of Asia,
for one important example.
Runaway greenhouse
warming can occur
for really extreme conditions (Venus at present, Earth in maybe 5 billion years time when the sun becomes a red giant), but is not a possibility
for the next hundred years.
Because if it dose we might be stuck down the rabit whole
for good because of
runaway global
warming caused by more bushfires and more melting of the permafrost releasing greenhouse gases and establishing a positive feedback loop.
As a non-scientist, it is reassuring that releases of Arctic methane should not force an apocalyptic
runaway warming event, although the effects will still have very nasty consequences
for our presently comfortable climate.
Re # 7, while permanent venusian - style
runaway warming is not possible now (until the sun becomes a lot hotter in billions of years), we could go into (what scientists have told me) is hysteresis, a really great
warming for even up to 100,000 or 200,000 years, in which a lot of life dies out, before the world cools back down again.
In light of the recent IPCC report released this past week and stating essentially that global
warming is a
runaway train that can't be stopped
for centuries, it may be tempting to give up hope
for a brighter future... But like any patient who suffers from a chronic disease that is potentially fatal, not only is education about the condition itself essential, but also what we can do to help mitigate its impact.
I
for one appreciate RealClimate's reality checks on
runaway warming fears.
Any normal person would conclude that CO2 is not causing
runaway global
warming, climate catastrophe, or
for that matter, any other problems.
But no evidence exists
for the proposition that such a feedback loop will cause dangerous or
runaway warming.
The CO2 is a feedback to ocean
warming, but not strong enough
for a
runaway effect.
It would have been ridiculous to use he 97 - 98 Record El Nino as being the start of «
runaway warming» and it is equally ridiculous
for anyone to begin drawing a trendline from 1998 to attempt to «manufacture» a pause or cooling.
So, the scientific thread of albedo prediction from optical depth, Van de Hulst, Sagan and Pollack [Venusian
runaway global
warming], Lacis and Hansen is wrong., the crutch
for the high CO2 - AGW hypothesis is taken away, CO2 probably loses AGW monopoly via «polluted cloud heating».
Of course Ferdinand is right not to project catastrophism onto anthropogenic CO2 levels
for as you likely know there is a inverse logarithmic relationship between changes in temperature and CO2 levels such that without the assumed positive feedback from water vapour there is no chance of
runaway global
warming, tipping points or whatever.
Many «climate scientists» would argue that the rate might change greatly after year 40 and lead to
runaway warming in years 51 through 100 that will lead to great disaster
for humanity if we do not implement what they think is correct.
In contrast to the sophisticated climate model predictions of
runaway («tipping point») global
warming, in reality, real - world global
warming, as measured by satellites, has disappeared
for over 16 years despite the gargantuan increases in CO2 emissions... (Ramez Naam denies this)
In a sharp change from its cautious approach in the past, the National Academy of Sciences on Wednesday called
for taxes on carbon emissions, a cap - and - trade program
for such emissions or some other strong action to curb
runaway global
warming.Such actions, which would increase the cost of using coal and petroleum — at least in the immediate future — are necessary because «climate change is occurring, the Earth is
warming... concentrations of carbon dioxide are increasing, and there are very clear fingerprints that link [those effects] to humans,» said Pamela A. Matson of Stanford University, who chaired one of five panels organized by the academy at the request of Congress to look at the science of climate change and how the nation should respond.
A new Ice Age could descend on us all, but Socrates would still be looking
for ways to keep his alarmist faith in man - made
runaway global
warming alive.
Big Tobacco was responsible
for stoking a cancer pandemic; Big Oil threatens life itself, by
runaway global
warming and its dire consequences.
However the basic question of
runaway global
warming seems countered by the fact that the planet has sustained life
for 4.5 billion years, despite periods in the past when CO2 levels were many times higher than they are now.
And then, ignoring that the heat we feel from the Sun is thermal infrared so does reach us, say that carbon dioxide a trace gas, and already fully part and parcel of the cooling cycling of the Earth in the Water Cycle, is responsible
for raising the temperature of the Earth from -18 °C to 15 °C, without ever giving any rational explanation as to how it actually does this, and, that doubling it will cause catastrophic
runaway global
warming, doubling a trace gas it still remains a trace gas.
2) Whilst not believing that co2 will cause
runaway warming and that carbon should remain an important mainstay of our energy requirements
for years to come, there are nevertheless compelling reasons to look
for cost effective alternatives, not least to secure cheap and reliable energy security.
Wary of how public concern over climate change could drop demand
for fossil fuel products, the Kochs have spent the last 15 years dumping over $ 61 million to front groups telling us that global
warming doesn't exist, or that it would destroy our economy to stop
runaway climate change.
CC can provide a perfectly adequate backdrop
for a story — there's some decent SF that happens to be set in a world stricken by
runaway global
warming — but if it's all about the message, then the tendency is towards something that's awkward, preachy, shrill, long - winded, unfunny (or unintentionally funny) or just plain dull.
For more than two decades, meteorologists and oceanographers have repeatedly warned that
runaway global
warming, as a consequence of ever - greater combustion of fossil fuels, could bring about an ice - free polar ocean by about 2050.
For those reasonable commenters here who wonder why the pro - AGW /
Runaway Global
Warming / Climate Catastrophe trolls argue incessantly, and nitpick every point ad nauseum,, the clear answer is given in this paper by a truly brave climate scientist, M.I.T.'s Prof. Richard Lindzen: click
A large injection of the gas - which is 21 times more potent as an atmospheric heat trap than carbon dioxide - has long been cited by climate scientists as the potential trigger
for runaway global
warming.
There is no indication of any trend in that data - nor is there in the instrumental data
for the past 150 years
for that matter - of any
runaway global
warming actually happening or credibly projected.
Perhaps the best we can hope
for now is that natural limiting mechanisms will kick in so that aviod
runaway global
warming.
But... do the scientific facts and latest empirical evidence indicate that sort of «
runaway tipping point» and extreme
warming fate is even remotely possible
for Earth in the future?
If correlation is an indicator of potential causation, then one would need to look at an entirely different reason other than CO2 emissions
for any attempt to justify a belief in the
runaway global
warming scenario.
And the result will be ever - escalating wars
for control of dwindling oil supplies, ever - escalating destruction of ecosystems, and irreversible,
runaway catastrophic global
warming, until the whole house of cards that constitutes the present - day «American way of life» collapses, in a very painful and ugly fashion.
And it seems that my initial interpretation was correct — as he explains in the video above, Hansen doesn't necessarily believe that approval of the Keystone XL will be the one straw that breaks the camel's back, delivering us unto a world destined
for catastrophic,
runaway global
warming.
It has been suggested that this is the limit of
warming that we should aim
for, in order to rein in the tippy
runaways.
Your view of WVP as a feedback gas would lead to
runaway warming which clearly doesn't happen, and
for sure the globe has been
warmer in the recent past, especially the holocene optimum, without running away.
Chuck, the quote seems pretty accurate to me, but some will cavil about the use of the phrase «out - of - control
runaway warming process»
for «each» of those systems; but there are certainly feedbacks associated with most of them that will indeed drive toward more
warming, though some effects are going to be stronger and faster than others.
In the case of Global
Warming, they really thought that we were heading for a «tipping point» that would lead us over the cliff into «runaway warming&
Warming, they really thought that we were heading
for a «tipping point» that would lead us over the cliff into «
runaway warming&
warming».
Dr. Lovelock, honored in 1997 with the Blue Planet Prize, which is widely considered the environmental equivalent of a Nobel award, has now come under attack from some environmentalists
for his support of nuclear power as a way to avoid
runaway «global heating» — his preferred alternative to «global
warming.»