Sentences with phrase «for sceptical scientists»

3 - It's not for sceptical scientists to disprove man - made warming.

Not exact matches

Indeed, many scientists would argue that recent research results tend to suggest that the public are right to be sceptical, both in terms of risks to human health, and increasing problems for farmers growing GM crops.

Even if you are not inclined to support sceptical views I think as a scientist that it is always preferable to read for oneself what is being said and to form your own views rather than just confirming your prejudices by listening dyed in the wool critics.

«For example, even most sceptical scientists would agree...» says who?

On several occasions Prof Stewart offers his commiserations to the defeated sceptical scientist with the words» you have to feel sorry for him really».

However, many other scientists are sceptical that CO2 - fertilisation could be strong enough to account for around 2 billion tonnes of carbon per year.Feedbacks involving different components of the carbon cycle - and climate change itself - will affect how CO2 levels respond to man - made emissions.

For me, that begins with people accepting that there is no hiding place left in the science — the overwhelming consensus of the vast body of scientists that study climate is that the trends we are seeing in the air, the oceans and in our ecosystems are entirely consistent with the theory of global warming, while the alternatives offered by sceptical scientists — even the much heralded role of the Sun — so far fail that test.

Moreover, by applying the term «denial» (with all its loaded undertones) to sceptical scientists; by referring to them inaccurately as «well funded» by the oil industry; and by likening those who stress the uncertainties of climate science to unprincipled lobbyists for tobacco companies, Lord May enters on the field of personal vilification — not a suitable place for a distinguished former President of the Royal Society.

Notwithstanding Lord Monckton's very excellent (instant) reasoning powers, my first choice for the «non-believers» in AGW would be Anthony Watts because he clearly has access to all the information he needs at his fingertips + he would be able to call on a lot of sceptical scientists, without reserve, including Lord Monckton I'm sure, should he not be sure about his answers.

You mean... you're not a teeny bit sceptical of this «ice age», announced by scientists who apparently work for a lobby - group?

Many scientists who are privately sceptical about it just daren't speak up for fear of losing their jobs or their grants.

Well, in my view the 2 young scientists appeared to volunteer for the camp, expressing their strong interest well before any sceptical analysis.

For a much more detailed discussion of a sceptical scientist's view of the validity of using model output as the basis for policing making in climate science, take a look at Dr Roy Spencer's explanation of how these models work and why he thinks they are flawFor a much more detailed discussion of a sceptical scientist's view of the validity of using model output as the basis for policing making in climate science, take a look at Dr Roy Spencer's explanation of how these models work and why he thinks they are flawfor policing making in climate science, take a look at Dr Roy Spencer's explanation of how these models work and why he thinks they are flawed:

Maybe now you will have a better sense of just how frustrated many sceptical, legitimate climate scientists have felt for the last couple of decades.