Not exact matches
The plan requires
school - by -
school reporting for federal
accountability purposes.
A new
report by the Foundation
for Education Reform and
Accountability (FERA) argues that Governor Andrew Cuomo can use public
school choice to significantly improve New York's public education system.
The
report also addresses a second, widely used
accountability policy: high -
school exit exams that hold students responsible
for meeting a set of content standards.
The Fordham Institute's new
report, High Stakes
for High Achievers: State
Accountability in the Age of ESSA, examines whether states» current or planned accountability systems for elementary and middle schools attend to the needs of high - achieving students, as well as how these systems might be redesigned under the Every Student Succeeds Act to better serve
Accountability in the Age of ESSA, examines whether states» current or planned
accountability systems for elementary and middle schools attend to the needs of high - achieving students, as well as how these systems might be redesigned under the Every Student Succeeds Act to better serve
accountability systems
for elementary and middle
schools attend to the needs of high - achieving students, as well as how these systems might be redesigned under the Every Student Succeeds Act to better serve all students.
State policymakers who wish to switch over to portability should think carefully not only about
reporting requirements and
accountability for private
schools under portability, but also about the details of the fiscal transition, such as hold harmless rates, that could allow high poverty public
schools now served with Title I time to adjust.
The measures used in the NEPC
report — whether
schools make AYP, state
accountability system ratings, the percentage of students that score proficient on state tests, and high -
school graduation rates — are at best rough proxies
for the quality of education provided by any
school.
Following the work on teacher absence, Muralidharan realized that low
accountability — only one out of 3,000
schools reported firing a teacher
for repeated absence — and the complete lack of differentiation between teachers on the basis of performance, were part of a systematic problem.
States use subgroups
for two purposes, with potentially two different minimum subgroup sizes, or n - sizes:
reporting (
school report cards available to the public online) and federal
accountability (used in state calculations to determine which
schools fall into particular categories under ESSA).
Implementation of the
school choice provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act has been stymied by a lack of space to accommodate transfers and unrealistic timelines
for notifying parents of their options, a
report by the Government
Accountability Office concludes.
Report cards track and compare state education policies and outcomes in six areas: chance -
for - success; K — 12 achievement; standards, assessments, and
accountability; transitions and alignment; the teaching profession; and
school finance.
Plans by the Bush administration to set a uniform way
for states to calculate and
report their graduation rates could make it harder
for high
schools to avoid
accountability measures under the No Child Left Behind Act.
Schools should be permitted to use multiple, locally created assessments instead of «one shot» tests to measure student progress
for accountability purposes, according to a report released last week by a panel of experts convened by the Forum on Educational Accountability, a group that includes some of the most vocal critics of the 5 - year - old No Child Le
accountability purposes, according to a
report released last week by a panel of experts convened by the Forum on Educational
Accountability, a group that includes some of the most vocal critics of the 5 - year - old No Child Le
Accountability, a group that includes some of the most vocal critics of the 5 - year - old No Child Left Behind Act.
For more on what is going on at the NRC, take a look at the recent
report on
school accountability, which Eric Hanushek has subjected to withering criticism.
The vast majority of state
accountability systems simply
report the average scores
for each
school, sometimes disaggregating by racial and ethnic groups.
Our
report suggests how policymakers can address issues in statute and regulation that undermine charter
school accountability, but this is an «all - hands - on - deck» moment
for the Buckeye State.
For example, in 2016 the AFC issued its first - ever «
report card» ranking states by the quality of their private -
school choice programs, and its scorecard values academic, administrative, and financial
accountability, not just access.
This offered
schools new levels of autonomy but under a rigorous
accountability framework and new challenges
for schools in terms of financial
reporting.
The State
Report examines how six states (Arizona, California, Illinois, Georgia, New York, and Virginia) designed their
accountability systems to meet the Title I requirements and the implications of these provisions
for schools with large numbers of low - income and minority students.
This is evident in the federal law's requirement that each state's
accountability system generate a
report card
for each
school and district indicating the proportion of students meeting proficiency standards on state tests of math and reading.
The
reports demonstrate that federal
accountability rules have derailed state reforms and assessment strategies, that the requirements have no common meaning across state lines, and that the sanctions fall especially hard on minority and integrated
schools, asking
for much less progress from affluent suburban
schools.
As Anne Hyslop
reported, the newly announced waiver guidelines now ask states
for «a demonstration that a
school may not receive the highest rating in the state's
accountability system if there are significant achievement or graduation rate gaps in the
school that are not closing.»
The latest example is their excellent recent
report on
accountability for «alternative» charter
schools (or «alternative education campuses» — AECs).
This
report, prepared
for NewSchools Venture Fund, examines how these charter restarts fit within the larger context of charter
school quality and
accountability, and describes how restarts worked at five charter
schools: Henry Ford Academy: Power House High in Chicago; Harriet Tubman in New Orleans; Paul Robeson in Trenton, NJ; Harlem Day in New York; and Hardy Williams in Philadelphia.
The Casey Foundation has provided money to build the infrastructure of the charter
school office, establish the city's
accountability and
reporting system, and help underwrite
school construction
for charter
schools in Indianapolis.
This
report, co-authored by Safal Partners and Public Impact
for the National Charter
School Resource Center, examines federal requirements under civil rights laws and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, and state laws governing charter school recruitment, retention, enrollment of EL students and their accountability for EL student performance; requirements and current challenges related to EL data reporting; and whether existing laws are adequate to address the needs of this growing population of ELs in charter sc
School Resource Center, examines federal requirements under civil rights laws and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, and state laws governing charter
school recruitment, retention, enrollment of EL students and their accountability for EL student performance; requirements and current challenges related to EL data reporting; and whether existing laws are adequate to address the needs of this growing population of ELs in charter sc
school recruitment, retention, enrollment of EL students and their
accountability for EL student performance; requirements and current challenges related to EL data
reporting; and whether existing laws are adequate to address the needs of this growing population of ELs in charter
schools.
The district files on record in the department on the dates specified by the commissioner shall be used
for all public
reporting, including that pursuant to subdivision (m) of this section and
for determining
school / district
accountability pursuant to subdivision (p) of this section.
While this replaces the statutory approach of basing all
accountability decisions on the separate performance of numerous student subgroups, including students from low - income families, the assessment results
for all of these «disadvantaged» student subgroups designated in the ESEA statute must be
reported each year and must be taken into account in determining performance consequences
for public
schools.
In response to the dire warnings in the 1983
report, standards, testing, and
accountability became the national agenda
for school reform.
Today, the left - wing Center
for Tax and Budget
Accountability (CTBA) released a misleading
report on
school choice programs in Indiana and elsewhere.
The opportunity
for choice to further strengthen
schools only comes when all
schools receiving public dollars — including charter and magnet
schools — face the same
reporting and
accountability requirements as traditional
schools.
As innovative assessments are administered and used
for accountability and
reporting in participating
schools, states in the demonstration authority can apply lessons learned from implementation to improve their innovative systems and take these projects to scale, building a new statewide assessment system over 5 years - one that is high - quality, fair, and worth taking.
As far back as 2007, a legislative
report in California warned that the state's
accountability system allowed traditional
schools to shirk responsibility
for low - performing students by referring them to alternative
schools.
The study, by Policy Analysis
for California Education (PACE), examines the potential effects of using single measures in California's CORE districts, where multiple measures of
school performance are included in annual
accountability reports.
Most such student - achievement targets were established
for «
reporting purposes only» and are no longer used
for any meaningful
school accountability purposes.
To the extent that there is skepticism about the value of student self -
reports for school accountability, it presents an opportunity to subject that skepticism to an empirical test.
Academic Standards (PDF) Academic and Career Plan (PDF) ADA 504 Notice (PDF) Asbestos Management Plan (PDF) Assessment Information (PDF) ATOD (PDF) Attendance Policy (PDF) Bullying (PDF) Child Nutrition (PDF) Directory and Yearbook Information (PDF) District Wellness Policy (PDF) Education
for Employment — Career Counseling (PDF) Education Options Available to Resident Children (PDF) Homeless Education Program (PDF) Human Growth and Development (webpage) Indoor Air Quality (PDF) Limited English Proficiency (PDF) Meal Charge Policy (PDF) Participation (PDF) Public Use of
School Facilities (PDF) Possession or Use of Cell Phones (PDF) Program and Curriculum Modifications — Programs
for Children At Risk (PDF)
School Accountability Report (webpage) Special Education (PDF) Special Needs Scholarship Program (PDF) Student Locker Searches (PDF) Student Non-Discrimination and Complaint Procedures (PDF) Student Records (PDF) Suicide Prevention Resources (PDF) Student Privacy — Pupil Records (PDF) Student Privacy — Directory and Yearbook Information (PDF) Title I Family Engagement Policy (PDF) Title I Professional Qualifications — Teacher (PDF) Title I Professional Qualifications — Teacher Assistant Youth Options Courses (PDF)
On April 2016 our member Padres y Jovenes Unidos released their 5th Annual Denver Community
Accountability Report Card and awarded Denver Public
Schools an overall C +
for the 2014 - 15
school year.
A
report by the Government
Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, criticized the federal Education Department
for taking too long to process applications, which did not give districts and
schools enough time to figure out the program's tricky framework.
The
report is being released as states are developing their
accountability plans
for the Every Student Succeeds Act, many of which include measures of
school climate.
This
report is a way to provide public
accountability for what we are doing, to document the lessons learned, and to highlight and share some of the issues and concerns that we, in partnership with the
schools, seek to address in coming months and years.
And, the
report is written in the hope that the state will step up and design a strong, new era
accountability system that partners effectively with local districts to ensure
schools deliver on the promise of educational opportunity
for English Learners.
These
reports show results
for schools on critical
accountability metrics, including how
schools fare on CCSA's minimum criteria
for renewal and State Board of Education revocation regulations.
In a new
report from the National Association of Charter
School Authorizers (NACSA), Mississippi received 26 out of a possible 33 points for authorizer quality and school accountab
School Authorizers (NACSA), Mississippi received 26 out of a possible 33 points
for authorizer quality and
school accountab
school accountability.
WakeEd has previously advocated
for creating a single
accountability tool that meets the federal standards and fairly
reports the performance of public
schools across the state.
«However, the
report fails to grasp that the real reason
for the loss of these activities is the high stakes
accountability based on pupils» outcomes in tests and examinations which is narrowing the curriculum and the opportunities available to children and young people, and which teachers and
school leaders have long been warning is a serious problem.
In January we published a
report on regional
schools commissioners (RSCs) calling
for improvements to their transparency,
accountability and working relationships.
The draft
accountability rules, to be released this summer, will encourage states to identify high - and low - performing teacher preparation programs across all kinds of educational models, not just those based in colleges and universities; urge a transition from current input - based
reporting requirements to a focus on more meaningful outcomes; and likely limit program eligibility
for TEACH grants — which are available to students who are planning to become teachers in a high - need field in a low - income
school — to only effective teacher preparation programs.
Public
accountability for school performance is necessary, and
reporting it so anyone can understand it is the minimum standard.
Alongside its demand
for new
accountability measures
for schools, the report suggests reforms to pupil premium funding so it can «better target funding for disadvantage» by allocating more to pupils eligible for free school meals «throughout their schooling», and the establishment of a Northern Powerhouse Schools Improvement
schools, the
report suggests reforms to pupil premium funding so it can «better target funding
for disadvantage» by allocating more to pupils eligible
for free
school meals «throughout their
schooling», and the establishment of a Northern Powerhouse
Schools Improvement
Schools Improvement Board.
Alone among the 50 states, California stopped
reporting accountability ratings
for public
schools in 2013 and was the first state in the nation to hit pause on
accountability.