Often these figures are not optimal
for scientific talks or oral or written presentations to audience members from outside the field.
Not exact matches
This is the first thing we
talk about in Lean Startup because you can not do any of the techniques of Lean Startup — the rapid experimentation, the
scientific approach, the broad development — none of it makes any sense and can't work unless you have a vision
for what you are trying to accomplish.
Netflix description: «Emmy - winning host Bill Nye brings experts and famous guests to his lab
for a
talk show exploring
scientific issues that touch our lives.»
Sometimes
scientific findings of such head - slapping obviousness —
talking on the phone makes you a worse driver and men generally favor large breasts,
for example — that they make the average lay person wonder how anyone ever got funding to investigate the question in the first place.
For all those who are
talking to themselves today, thinking that some supernatural deity is listening to them, please seek professional psychiatric help before you hurt someone or yourself in the name of your sky fairy, vote against others» rights, or promote your chosen flavor of insanity over the
scientific method.
«The European
talks of progress because by the aid of a few
scientific discoveries he has established a society which has mistaken comfort
for civilization».
And now we get to watch while Creationists imprison Nye in a tower until he recants his sacreligous
talk much in the way Galileo was imprisoned by the Church
for supporting the
scientific theory that the Earth revolves around the Sun rather than the universe revolving around the Earth.
’28 Kuhn's portrayal of normal science as dominated by unchallenged dogmas, his failure to specify criteria
for paradigm choice, and his
talk of «conversion» and «persuasion» all seem to these critics to threaten the objectivity and rationality of the
scientific enterprise.
There is therefore a foundation
for distinguishing
scientific talk from theological
talk in one and the same world.
It is not necessary
for me to recount why Bultmann finds this incredibility in the form; suffice it to say that he is not committed to any particular
scientific world - view, although Jaspers and others have charged him with this, but is simply stating that the contemporary man does not as a matter of fact think or
talk in terms of such a form.
When a believer bit.ches and moans about how if gay marriage is legalized, next is polygamy, in.cest and beastiality, (because
for some reason all of those things are related) and we reject that because 1) beastiality is stupid because we're
talking about two consenting adults 2) Polygamy is not really immoral but just incredibly tricky legally to design docu.ments that would make sense and 3) inc.est has some
scientific ramifications and most of us can agree that as far as icky se.xual stuff goes, that ones a doozy.
The Voyager series threw out the word «quantum» about as much as Chopra does, and I suspect
for the same reason: It sounds
scientific - ish, and helps make it appear like they know what they're
talking about.
It's far too easy
for theists to
talk people into philosophical circles, causing them to lose sight of the
scientific and logical shortcomings of their beliefs.
I have no idea what your
talking about, I've called
for our Governor to answer with
Scientific data the questions New Yorkers have about Fracking, and if the Science is right and questions are addressed in a rational manner we can decide as a State if Fracking is feasible.
Asked about including new rules
for scientific research of guns in the bill, Emanuel suggested that was extraneous, comparing it to the distracting
talk of «midnight basketball» programs the last time Congress tried to pass major gun control legislation in the early 1990s.
Gadêlha and the Oxford SIAM committee planned the agenda of the events they will hold this academic year, including an induction day
for newcomers, student seminars,
scientific talks by professors, networking events, visits to industry campuses, and an annual conference.
For Aguilar, who learned about the program from a professor, «I thought it would be a really great way to practice
scientific communication and
talk about conservation.»
Scientific American staffers Mark Fischetti and Robin Lloyd
talk with podcast host Steve Mirsky about sessions they attended — including those about algae
for energy, dissecting the astronomy in art, and attitudes about climate change — at the recent meeting of the American Association
for the Advancement of Science.
One thing is
for sure: While you may not be able to
talk in
scientific terms about what makes a basketball shoe the greatest, you still know it when you see it.
For Science
Talk, the weekly podcast of
Scientific American, I'm Steve Mirsky.
For the Insights story, «Beating the Flu in a Single Shot, «appearing in the June 2008
Scientific American, Alexander Hellemans
talked with Walter Fiers of Ghent University in Belgium.
M
For Scientific American's Science
Talk, I'm Steve Mirsky.
Jon Foley, director of the University of Minnesota's Institute on the Environment,
talks with podcast host Steve Mirsky (pictured) about his article in the April issue of
Scientific American, «Boundaries
for a Healthy Planet».
For Science
Talk, the podcast of
Scientific American, I am Steve Mirsky.
Welcome to Science
Talk, the weekly podcast of
Scientific American
for the seven days starting August 22nd.
This was the gist of a
talk Newman delivered on a cool, gray day last fall to a packed lecture hall in the cavernous Boston Convention and Exhibition Center, where more than 5,000 emergency physicians from around the world gathered
for the
Scientific Assembly of the American College of Emergency Physicians.
For Scientific American Science
Talk, I'm Steve Mirsky.
At the recent meeting of the American Association
for the Advancement of Science, Stony Brook University's Robert Crease
talked about how a 1999 article in
Scientific American on Brookhaven National Laboratory's Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and a future Nobel laureate got a few people thinking the planet was in jeopardy.
Ulrich,
for instance, writes about «the need
for research to establish
scientific guidelines to help interior designers select art that is reliably stress reducing and physiologically supportive...» But he is
talking only about art in hospitals and in other medical contexts, where he believes the sole critical standard is whether art «improves outcomes in patients, and if it doesn't, it's bad art.»
Trevor Mundel, president of global health at the Gates Foundation,
talks to
Scientific American editor - in - chief Mariette DiChristina about the Coalition
for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and the efforts to create vaccine platforms
for rapid responses to epidemics.
Steve: Welcome to Science
Talk, the weekly podcast of
Scientific American
for the seven days starting November 12th 2008.
Author and journalist Carl Zimmer
talks about the search
for the physiological and biological basis of intelligence, the subject of his article in the October issue of
Scientific American magazine.
Well that's it
for this edition of the
Scientific American's Science
Talk.
Welcome to Science
Talk, the weekly podcast of
Scientific American
for the seven days starting October 1st, 2008.
For Science
Talk, the podcast of
Scientific American, I'm Steve Mirsky.
Welcome to Science
Talk, the weekly podcast of
Scientific American
for the seven days starting November 22nd.
This year O.H.S.U. is hosting seven weeks of activities, including
talks by leading brain researchers and science writers such as Jonah Lehrer (a contributing editor
for Scientific American Mind), a workshop for teachers, a brain fair and a scientifi
Scientific American Mind), a workshop
for teachers, a brain fair and a
scientificscientific meeting.
For Science
Talk, the weekly podcast of
Scientific American, I am Steve Mirsky.
For Science
Talk, the podcast of
Scientific American.
And I'm Steve Mirsky,
for Scientific American's Science
Talk podcast.
Social scientist Roly Russell, of the Sandhill Institute in British Columbia,
talked with
Scientific American's Mark Fischetti at the annual meeting of the American Association
for the Advancement of Science about potentially better measures than GDP of a nation's well - being
Scott: Well, we
talked about this a lot and we've been working with the
scientific societies and education societies that we work with, but we also work with the celebrities community and so we have a kind of a broader range of folks that we interact with than most science co-organizations because, you know, National Center
for Science Education is this very odd hybrid of an activist organization, but still a scholarly organization at the same time so.
Listen
for clips from some of these lectures on the
Scientific American Science
Talk podcast, including Fovell's explanation as to why the notion of a freezing air mass that descends on New York City in the movie The Day After Tomorrow is goofy.
At climate
talks in Copenhagen a year ago, delegates were galvanised by the
scientific arguments
for reaching an agreement to cut emissions.
Steve: Welcome to Science
Talk, the weekly podcast of
Scientific American
for the seven days starting December 19th, I am Steve Mirsky.
Steve: Welcome to Science
Talk, the weekly podcast of
Scientific American
for the seven days starting May 28th, 2008.
For more on this work, check out the August 25th episode of Science
Talk, the weekly
Scientific American podcast.
In this episode, Liz Johnson and Felicity Arengo from the American Museum of Natural History take
Scientific American podcast host Steve Mirsky
for a walk in the park — Central Park — to
talk about the spring bird migration and the role that Central Park and other green spaces plays in the lives of birds and other animals.
Scientific American's David Biello
talks about his article in the November issue that examines America's nuclear arsenal and options
for the future and
Scientific American Mind magazine «sKaren Schrock gives us a rundown from the big neuroscience meeting, that she attended last week.
Well that's it
for this edition
for Scientific American's Science
Talk.