Sentences with phrase «for scientists on both sides»

In the 1930s, the rise of Nazi Germany and the threat of war provided a stimulus for scientists on both sides of the conflict to turn Albert Einstein's famous E = MC2 theory into a destructive reality.

Not exact matches

The difficulty was, that to say so, even for a scientist with the factsat his fingertips, was to go against a powerful and intolerant conventional wisdom: «We liberals», he wrote, «who work in the fields of global HIV / AIDS and family planning take terrible professional risks if we side with the pope on a divisive topic such as this.

Amen.The thing is too many people from both sides try to disprove the other, Scientist (well some) will say there is no God Ala Hawkings here and then some believers will say that evolution or anything pertaining to science that they don't understand is false.I don't believe that science and God are mutually exclusive.For me personally science helps to explain a lot of things regarding creation, almost like giving me a window into how creative God is.I believe that God uses science to show us how awesome he is.To me science does not disprove Gods existence it actually reaffirms it on a human logic level, for me.You may disagree, that's fine, but this is just how I see it.

The principal secretary of the USSR Academy of Sciences expressed the view that scientists on both sides of the Atlantic had reached a consensus and were unified in their view that nuclear war would spell disaster for the world.

I like science and am often amazed at what scientists discover or invent, but I also leave room for a little doubt on both sides.

Scientists on both sides of the Atlantic are researching a little - known cereal that could be used in breads for people with gluten intolerance.

The number of scientists and clinicians who have called over the last several years for more accurate reporting by the media on concussions and CTE, criticized the reporting of strongly presented causal assumptions relating to concussive and subconcussive brain impact exposure as «scientifically premature,» and highlighted the negative real world consequences to such one - sided reporting, has grown to consensus proportions, but have largely flown beneath the media's radar.

Third, acknowledging that some of the blame for the biased and one - sided media reporting on head injuries rests with some members of the scientific community who issue one - sided press releases and feed cherry - picked results about their findings to selected members of the media, the authors look to a day when the «harsh division and polarization» in the research community (an almost inevitable byproduct, unfortunately, of the intense competition for grant money in Concussion, Inc.), gives way to greater collaboration among researchers and a more «cordial discourse» between scientists via letters and responses to journal editors and back - and - forth debates at large academic conferences.

Climate scientist Jon Foley of the University of Minnesota, who is part of a team of researchers that defined safe limits for 10 planetary systems, including climate, argues for erring on the side of caution.

«And if you discover some great new thing and patent it, you can encourage students to spin off a little company on the side, and for sure you can't do that as an industrial research scientist.

On the plus side, Mark Citron, vice president of clinical and regulatory affairs at TyRx Pharma in Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, a combination cardiac device manufacturer, says it's much easier for entry - level scientists to find jobs at MD&D companies.

On the other side of the Atlantic, the European Union has set targets for increases in research and development spending that, it predicts, will require 700,000 new scientists in the coming years.

In upcoming investigations, the scientists want to verify their findings on the development of liver cancer and search for active substances that inhibit apoptosis while simultaneously causing the mildest possible side effects.

Scientists meeting in Warsaw last week ranked the Namibian site as the best of five options for the southern array of the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA), which will be comprised of two observatories, one on each side of the equator.

For all their disagreements, scientists on both sides of the fracking debate agree that it is very unlikely that microfracturing of rock formation itself contributes to the vertical migration of gases.

Although efforts to provide real career opportunities for more scientists would create stronger incentives for Americans to seek science careers, the political momentum appears to be on the side of granting more H - 1B visas.

As infuriating as it might be to the scientists who would agree with the first letter, the second one is likely to be an effective tool for those who prefer inaction, based on a view of the science as equally balanced between two sides.

With the aid of numerical simulation, the scientist and his team have developed a crash - optimized track design for bending stress such as might arise when a car collides head - on with a tree or is hit by another car from the side.

Kofman says an informal vote among Rosetta scientists came down narrowly on the side of looking for Philae.

«It's going to be a huge step forward,» says Steve Squyres at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, lead scientist for the Mars Exploration Rovers Spirit and Opportunity, which landed on different sides of the planet in 2004.

Erring on the side of caution, the scientists suggest that life is but one explanation for this chemical oddity.

Luckily for me, the guy in the room on the other side of the shared bathroom was a worm scientist studying sleep (ha!)

There is a lot of great research on improving Asian rice for African farmers that is being done by brilliant AfricaRice scientists, and they are working hard on the social science side too.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the planet, scientists in Australia are building their own underground laboratory to search for elusive particles.

At the beginning of the 20th century a Russian scientist put probiotics on the science map, but as soon as antibiotics came along probiotics fell to the way side for years.

For more than 80 years doctors and scientists on all sides have experimented on humans to perfect weapons of mass destruction - often with fatal results.

Enter the remaining cast of characters, both major and minor: the janitorial staff of the classified underground wing of the compound, Zelda Fuller (Octavia Spencer in a role written for her by del Toro) and the mute Elisa Esposito (Sally Hawkins, radiant in a star - making role); the attending government scientist Dr. Robert Hoffstetler (Michael Stuhlbarg), also a Russian double - agent; and, of course, Elisa's next door neighbor, Giles (Richard Jenkins, deserving of a Supporting Actor nomination), who frets about growing older and his hair loss, pines for love with a local pie shop employee and shares his passion for musicals with the equally besotted Elisa (they sit side - by - side on the sofa performing a quick soft shoe).

Formulated with the highest quality botanicals Happy Traveler was designed by a holistic veterinarian and PhD herbal scientist to ease anxiety and motion sickness Useful for separation anxiety travel anxiety to socialize a nervous or excitable pet into a new environment during thunderstorms fireworks airline travel visits to groomers vets and kennels With your Vets approval helps your pet during recovery from surgeryinjury by relaxing them to minimize chewing on bandages and sutures Nonhabit forming No harmful side effects when used as directed

For both economic and moral reasons, Google needs to stand on the right side of history and stop supporting those who are best known for attacking scientists, denying reality and obstructing government actiFor both economic and moral reasons, Google needs to stand on the right side of history and stop supporting those who are best known for attacking scientists, denying reality and obstructing government actifor attacking scientists, denying reality and obstructing government action.

Scientists on both sides of the argument ought to put more emphasis on adequate preparations for possible changes whatever they might be rather then on the mostly futile attempt to convince one another and the public.

Actually before RC came on line I was despairing that either the climate scientists were going over to the dark side in droves (to the contrarians), possibly for filthy lucre, or were afraid to speak out due to various repercussions they might face at their universities or gov institutes.

Clearly, reporters on the other side of the Atlantic learned not to put so much trust in scientists, which might be a somewhat valid lesson, if not for the fact that they got carried away with it.

The sands of the climate debate are surely shifting rapidly, with major implications for those who are active in the public debate — scientist / advocates on both sides, environmentalists and the libertarian think tanks, the media, and policy makers and politicians.

He would not be on the side of powerful fossil fuel interests who fund attacks on scientific research; perhaps this time, ironically, he would be on the side of his Pope and the scientists whose council he regularly seeks, who respect facts and evidence and recognize the reality we live in for what it is.

I have always aspired to be a scientist, to push the envelope of knowledge past the mundane, but got drafted for some war effort that was a worthless waste or resources and lives on both sides.

And he does it for a transparent purpose: to maintain the perception of the debate as one divided into scientists on the one side, and foolish «deniers» on the other.

On the other side of the debate an increasing number of scientists are speaking out for a variety of reasons.

But arguments over the precise value of climate sensitivity duck the wider point, which is that even if we're lucky and climate sensitivity is on the low side of scientists» estimates, we're still heading for a substantial level of warming by the end of the century if greenhouse gas emissions aren't addressed, as the IPCC has highlighted.

Can the sceptic / denier scientists deep inside really believe that all the individuals on the majority side (for instance, IPCC writers and those cited with concurrence) are affected by mass hysteria?

On the civil society side, the March for Science may have fizzled, but scientists have found other avenues to #resist.

The principal groups speaking for climate scientists have played a central role in making «who are you, whose side are you on?»

It's a bit cheap, given that there's no evidence or even likelihood, that actual climate scientists are responsible for this hoax, to say that jumping to very firm conclusions on very little evidence, and indeed fraudulently improving the evidence that doesn't quite show what you want it to, are characteristic of one side of this debate rather than the other.

This seems a good reason for erring on the side of caution, but doesn't seem a valid attack on climate scientists nor a reason to hype up short term equilibrium climate sensitivity which correctly avoids the issue by dealing with CO2 levels.

i think that's inaccurate shx, the scientists did their work, and from what i could gather tried very hard not to overstate their case, the media did the scare - mongering and the media have then turned like the whores they are in the other direction, al gore's film upped the tempo and although it seemed like a good thing at the time, i think with hindsight it was a poisoned chalice, but lets be clear, doing research in multiple areas and having the results point to potentially catastrophic climate change and asking for changes to be made to avert this is not scare - mongering, its common sense, accepting that their is margin for error but erring on the side of caution since the stakes are life on earth as we know it is not scare - mongering, it is the application of the precautionary principle and common sense

For the decade of 2007 - 2017 (left), the research team predicts that there may be some growth of winter sea ice in the Arctic Ocean, particularly on the Atlantic side, where scientists have the most confidence in the model's ability.

For the decade of 2013 - 2023 (right), the scientists expect to see some winter sea ice loss balanced with sea ice gain on the Atlantic side of the Arctic Ocean, where scientists have the most confidence in the model's ability.

Peter Gleick's career isn't over despite the big scar linked to his duping the Heartland Institute, says Kevin Trenberth, an atmospheric scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo. «I think this pushes Peter in the direction of getting even more involved on the side of being an advocate,» Trenberth told ME on Friday.

One of the great oddities of the debate about climate science is the contempt for scientists displayed by the lay cheerleaders on both sides.

It has been criticized from many sides, including naturally numerous skeptics but also climate scientists like Schellnhuber, evidently for reasons that are in some ways opposite to those of the skeptics, but may also coincide on some points.

«There are a handful of people and organizations who have tried to cloud the debate... they have engaged in this 11th - hour smear campaign, where they have stolen personal emails from scientists, mined them for single words or phrases that can be taken out of context to twist their words, and I think this is rather telling... Those advocating inaction don't have the science on their side, so they turn to this last minute smear campaign.»