Sentences with phrase «for skeptics looking»

Not exact matches

But these findings often meet with a response that is breathtaking in its creativity, as skeptics look for ways to show that women are somehow mysteriously less qualified, less committed, or harder to manage than men.

There were plenty of skeptics in 2009 when Disney bought Marvel Entertainment for $ 4 billion, but the deal looks like one of the best of CEO Bob Iger's career.

I will admit that when it was just a bookseller I was a skeptic of Amazon's viability as a business and also of Jeff's strategic leadership, but he has proven to be what I look for in a CEO — a bold visionary that implements big strategies, sometimes despite conventional wisdom.

Your name on here «Voice of Reason»... I believe is an insight into who you are - you're looking for truth and are a skeptic.

But sport does have its bewitching power, and for evidence a skeptic need only look at South Africa.

In The New I Do: Reshaping Marriage for Skeptics, Realists and Rebels (Seal Press, Sept. 28, 2014), therapist Susan Pease Gadoua and journalist Vicki Larson take a groundbreaking look at the modern shape of marriage to help readers open their minds to marrying more consciously and creatively.

As some of you know, Susan Pease Gadoua and I are co-writing The New I Do: Reshaping Marriage for Skeptics, Realists and Rebels (and just snagged a literary agent, so things are really looking promising!)

Given that, here's what I predict, based on current trends and research done for The New I Do: Reshaping Marriage for Skeptics Realists and Rebels, love and marriage will look like in the years ahead.

If we look for patterns among skeptics, a characteristic comes to light: they are extremely religious and conservative.

For a few minutes it looked like a détente had been reached between John Holdren, the president's science advisor, and Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R - CA), the leading climate skeptic on the House of Representatives science committee.

«If you're having a real skeptic for dinner, or trying to get an unconvinced family member to try a healthier meal, then always cook something that looks and feels familiar to them.

Whether you're a bona fide meditation follower or a skeptic looking for more information, you won't want to miss Light Watkins» simple and refreshing real - life perspective on meditation as an art form, daily practice, and way of life.

Best keto meatloaf recipes for the lover of meatloaf and the skeptic looking for that elusive flavorsome and «this is the best ever» recipe... Share0 Share +10 Tweet0 Pin0 Meatloaf is one of those adaptable comfort foods.

That's a world I'd like to live in, but the skeptic in me says, «nah»; rather, costs are being cut and companies are looking for ways to charge more for the same trite $ 10 - $ 20 box.

So, if you are looking to start with online dating and want to know how to put your best foot forward, here is what you should do: Are you aware that there are... Online Dating Skeptic But for the skeptic, it seems like a bit of a dubious concept... The research was divided Read Skeptic But for the skeptic, it seems like a bit of a dubious concept... The research was divided Read skeptic, it seems like a bit of a dubious concept... The research was divided Read More...

TV Guide has revealed two San Diego Comic - Con posters for Fox's upcoming paranormal action comedy series Ghosted featuring Adam Scott and Craig Robinson; take a look below... SEE ALSO: Craig Robinson and Adam Scott channel The X-Files in first trailer for Ghosted LEROY WRIGHT (Robinson) is a cynical skeptic and former missing persons detective, who, if we're -LSB-...]

Wills instead is writing for the postmodern skeptic, the soul who looks at the trappings of many traditional...

There's something to be said for trying to look as professional as possible though, especially with the print book; but I also think it's fine to «own up to» and even take pride in the fact that you self - published, as some skeptics may feel you're «trying to hide it» otherwise.

It's possible the skeptics are looking for the wrong evidence.

The skeptic in me wondered as to whether Nintendo had seen diminishing returns on the audience that arrived with the Wii, and were looking to steal a slice of the gaming pie they didn't have, and perhaps have never had given the Call Of Duty demographic may not hold the same affection for the company that older gamers do.

I'll look for your skeptic take when Scorpio has oculous.

The skeptic in me says «nothing like a bit of censorship to get the word out, for free» but the old conservative man in me says «tone down the come - hither look and nobody would have a problem with it» (just so we're clear, I'm not old or conservative, I don't sit in any boxes).

Not too bad for skeptics, although it doesn't make it look like it's a good correction.

Sorry Gavin, but I am a skeptic, looking for an explanation.

The weakness in looking at short time scales was revealed nicely in a simple and revealing animated graph, created for the Skeptical Science blog, showing how self - described climate skeptics were «going down the up escalator.»

As for the C word (I peeked) if you claim to be a true skeptic you should take a look at information from primary sources as well as the carefully rolled out campaign, whose timing should be a giveaway that it was planned with skill and precision.

If the truth is that Erik Conway and / or others told Oreskes about «corrupted skeptic scientists» such as Dr S Fred Singer in mid-summer 2004, then she simply looks like she was waiting for an excuse to launch the kind of personal attack she despises.

«It's only we climate skeptics who have to look for little journals and little publishers like mine to even get published».

We already looked at how climate skeptics rely on a selective reading of the literature to highlight low estimates of climate sensitivity and use the divergence between climate models and measured temperatures to make conjectural statements about climate models being too sensitive to CO2, without considering other factors that could account for such divergence.

So, in brief descriptions, here are items having massive appearance problems in Dave Rado's Ofcom complaint, coupled with what to look for in any similar complaint lodged against skeptic climate scientists.

So when you then add «I came to this blog seriously hoping that there was an honest climate skeptic,» I would suggest that you came here with the intent to look for any evidence, no matter how semantic, pointless or ridiculous, to reinforce your view that all sceptics are «dishonest.»

Selecting Search lets you instantly search all the skeptic arguments - this is the way I use the app to get straight to the argument I'm looking for.

Other skeptics have looked at the same science and same data, and decided that for them, there is still not enough there to accept AGW as provisionally true.

Are we looking at the graph with the jaundiced eye of skeptic, for the sake of the health and credibility of future scientific endeavors, or with a shopkeepers desire to fill shelf space with whatever the government will buy?

Anyway, I look forward to you asking for more precise language when «skeptics» talk about «fraud climate scientists» advancing their «socialist agenda» via an «AGW cabal» — certainly rhetoric that sounds like «conspiratorial gibberish,» don't you think?

Don't waste your time calling for RICO investigations of the IPCC or the consensus scientists — it just makes skeptics look bad (like the other side).

I have a history with Andy Revkin's DotEarth, which is prone to provide fuel for sloppy thinking about weather and climate, as well as a hangout for the worst kind of clever - looking phony skeptic arguments.

Previous skeptic studies have simply looked for the hot spot and not found it.

Skeptics look for wiggle room in that by always ignoring the second part.

Assuming that you're one of those «skeptics,» and looking at the range estimations of likely impact based energy balance that are often promoted by «skeptics» (although certainly there are many «skeptics» who think that there is no possibility that ACO2 will warm the climate to any measurable extent)-- then we can reasonably assume that you agree that there is a «fat tail» potential for high impact consequences from BAU.

Since the science doesn't convince most skeptics, they are looking for other ways to help the poor and misinformed masses understand that global warming is real.

No need to trust me on this, look among any of the sites you rely on for narratives about the skeptic scientists» corruption: RealClimate, David Suzuki, The New Yorker's big article about the Kochs last year, the Union of Concerned Scientists, George Monbiot, SourceWatch, DeSmogBlog, Hoggan & Littlemore, Naomi Oreskes, Chris Mooney, Mark Hertsgaard, on and on and on — they all point to Ross Gelbspan as the source of that memo I refer to.......

We will also look at the issue of bias, not just for skeptics but for AGW supporters as well.

Here is some of the hard data honest skeptics are looking for - at this resolution.

When I started looking into different blogs I was shocked by the aggressive, humiliating and selfish communication style of many so called «climate scientists» using their time more for advocating «settled» science and attacking «skeptics», than for research.

The models underestimated the warming from 1984 - 1998, but no one said they were undersensitive for that period, because skeptics only look at the part of the record when the models were catching up.

I hope David receives the kind of feedback he has been looking for in both areas and, while I'm on the line for the first time on Climate Audit, thank you to the whole Aussie skeptic team (that I'm aware of), including Bob Carter and, not least, your own work with David Henderson which, from what I can tell, usefully triggered the interest of Nigel Lawson here in London not just in climate change but its policy implications.

This isn't rocket science, all that's required is an internet search for the «crooked skeptic scientists» accusation, then a look within the results to find out who the accusers cite as their source.

Start dissecting their narratives, comparing them side - by - side while looking for physical evidence corroborating Ross Gelbspan's «industry corruption» accusation against skeptic climate scientists, and a very different picture becomes clear: these people's narratives don't line up right, they collectively have no evidence backing up their accusation, and this prompts serious questions of whether core leaders of the global warming movement are totally oblivious to this situation, or if they knew their narratives had no merit from the start.

As a skeptic, I am always looking for evidence to support the claims I make, as well as claims other people make.