Jane A. Flegal and Aarti Gupta — Evoking equity as a rationale
for solar geoengineering research?
Peter C. Frumhoff and Jennie C. Stephen — The Siren Call of US Funding
for Solar Geoengineering Research
Not exact matches
To be clear: I am not a climate sceptic, but I do feel deeply uncomfortable with the suggestion that ever more
research on
geoengineering — in particular
solar radiation management (SRM)-- is required in order to prepare the world
for an impending climatic emergency.
A groundbreaking new CSPO project explores the potential
for citizens to usefully inform the governance of
solar geoengineering research.
Andy Parker is a
Research Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS) in Potsdam, focusing on the politics and governance of research into solar geoengi
Research Fellow at the Institute
for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS) in Potsdam, focusing on the politics and governance of
research into solar geoengi
research into
solar geoengineering.
In our
research, we identify three sets of equity - related arguments advanced by sociotechnical vanguards advocating
for more
solar geoengineering research.
The first is a call
for more
solar geoengineering research as a means to shed light on the distributional outcomes of envisioned futures with and without
solar geoengineering.
The second equity - related rationale
for more
research is a call
for comparative risk — risk assessment, underpinned by the claim that equity demands that potential risks and benefits of
solar geoengineering be compared to the risks of climate change itself, especially
for vulnerable populations.
In this context, a small group of experts advocating
for more
research into
solar geoengineering — what we term, following Stephen Hilgartner, «sociotechnical vanguards,» — are justifying a call
for more
research, sometimes on equity grounds.
For these reasons, we analyze the content of expert understandings of equity and raise some questions about who and what gets excluded from expert discourses of equity in the context of
solar geoengineering research.
The Americans — who published their findings on Sunday in Nature Climate Change — ran two different climate models, CAM3.5 and HadCM3L — the one devised by the US National Center
for Atmospheric
Research and the other by the UK Met Office's Hadley Centre and simulated a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentrations, temperature - compensating stratospheric
solar radiation management (SRM)
geoengineering — and compared precipitation changes.
Respectively they were the chair and senior policy adviser
for the Royal Society's landmark report on
geoengineering in 2009, and today they are co-chair and project director
for an international initiative to expand discussion of the governance of
solar geoengineering research to developing countries (www.srmgi.org).
The two of us were among a group of international experts asked to propose and critique a number of policy options, such as avoiding methane emissions, improving forestry practices, increased spending
for energy technology innovation and
researching solar radiation management, a form of
geoengineering.
Earlier this month, MacMartin, Keith and Prof Katharine Ricke, a climate scientist from the University of California, San Diego, published a
research paper exploring how
solar geoengineering — via releasing aerosols into the stratosphere — could be used as part of an «overall strategy»
for limiting global warming to 1.5 C, which is the aspirational target of the Paris Agreement.
How the ledger is likely to balance out globally, and particularly
for the global South, is unknown, yet that is precisely the reason why more
research on
solar geoengineering is so urgently needed.
The document, drafted by representatives of the Oxford
Geoengineering Programme, suggested some steps forward for governing solar geoenginee
Geoengineering Programme, suggested some steps forward
for governing
solar geoengineeringgeoengineering research.
«Ice911
Research: Preserving and Rebuilding Reflective Ice», presented as part of Strategies
for Cooling Earth:
Solar Geoengineering and Carbon Dioxide Removal I Posters, American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, San Francisco, CA, December 2014.