Sentences with phrase «for stadium debt»

Although an argument could be made in favour for the stadium debt, the club are in a position where they can financially compete with other English giants, yet, there is an ongoing lack of signings, or money spent, by the club.

You ai nt achieved shit yet and wait till you have to start selling players to pay for your stadium debt.

In some ways you would have to agree with this (then again its not easy when you have to sell your best players to pay for stadium debt).

Prior to Ozil the last record signing was done a couple months after Gazidis joined and paying for stadium debt....

Not exact matches

wenger got a renewed contract, stadium debt is akmost paid up and still no investment in players... who can we blame for that?AW.

Or maybe he waited until our stadium debt was settled for us to hire a better medical staff that would require a better salary.

As we get closer to paying off the stadium debt we are also getting closer to competing for the title, any fool can see that.

After paying off stadium debt — challenge for top honours, grow what Kronke would call the Arsenal Brand.

Then along came kroenke, saw high ticket prices, waiting list for season tickets, acceptance by fans of the top four model and stadium debt reducing and becoming more manageable.

At the same time, he bought a 520k acre ranch worth $ 725 million ish while the city of St Louie still had a debt of $ 35 million which was used to build a stadium for Kroenkes team.

the city should sue them for the bond debt for renovating the stadium to lure them back from L.A. in the 1990s.

Wenger and Gazidis: Bargain buys until stadium debt largely gone and then Gazidis offers # 40mil and # 1 for Suarez... Try to blame Wenger and I will call you ignorant unless you show some form of evidence to back up the ignorant claim.

As for Wenger never spending big... Funny how Arsenal broke their own transfer record while having stadium debt before Gazidis arrives and since he came we just didn't compete and even missed out on getting Cazorla 12 months earlier because of a couple million...

you can google and see it for yourself more than 10 clubs that build a stadium and at the same time winning major trophies at home and in europe... its not like we finished our debt or we couldn't have afforded to keep our players, we could have but then our bank balance wouldn't be 300m euros....

The problem at arsenal, as I see it is that for many years we have had to sell our best players and maintain out top four position because of the stadium debt.

But u cant conveniently ignore the massive stadium debt that limited us financially for a good 7 - 8 years.

Do you not think to yourself; «Prior to our stadium move Wenger was good enough, our stadium move with debt held Wenger back for a few year but since then he has won a trophy each year...»?

As I see it, we were promised jam tomorrow, when stadium debt is paid off all will be well, but put up with high ticket prices and top four finish for now.

Club has paid for the cost (original and interest of debt) of new stadium and made profit every year for 14 years by its own resource.

It's been a fair few years since Arsenal were last forced into selling one of their best players and brightest talents to a rival and those days are supposedly over for good now, given that the stadium debts have finally been paid off.

, Wenger bought Arshavin for a club record transfer AFTER the debt for the stadium was put on the club.

Believe in Wenger???? Look at his record for last 5 year.I agree things were difficult after we moved to new stadium with huge debt in our books.But what has he done in last 5 yrs to make fans believe in him.

Wenger done that role for a short period until Dein was replaced by Gazidis, that short period on his own Wenger spent «big», breaking Arsenals own transfer record while having stadium debts.

The stadium debt was obviously a big priority for the club, and the transfer movements made in that time were more relevant to a mid-table club than one challenging for the title.

The model has been in place for over 10 years but us fans supported the club because we accepted that stadium debts had to be paid.

We are a club with history and prestige — We haven't won the league in 13 years but it was only in the last 4 years that we have had the finances to compete as we have had to pay off the debt for our stadium so if we wanted to judge our success we would have to use the last 4 years and we have won 3 fa cups which is the second biggest trophy in England.

DIFFERENT TOPIC The emirates stadium is meant for champions and chelsea NEED A NEW ONE and their supporters would had they changed to this stadium with all the debt they would have performed much better!!!

If you could think for youself then you would of realized that Wenger and Dein bought in quality and Wenger on his own spent the cash to buy in players... even though we had stadium debts at the time, Wenger still broke Arsenals own transfer record.

The way I see things is that up until a season and a bit ago, we didn't really have the finances to spend on world class players as we were using the funds for other more important responsibilities, like the stadium debt and who knows what else.

Perhaps, he was responsible for restructuring the stadium debt too, you know since he's an economist and all?

We had stadium debt and Wenger broke our own record transfer for a 28 year old Arshavin while he also payed handsomely for Nasri, Nasri had signed a new contract to get more money from Arsenal for the transfer and Wenger coughed up with the money.

So much for things getting better when stadium debt was not a millstone around our neck.

His vision for a better Arsenal through the debt ridden years (for the stadium) is worth applauding.

We've said countless times that we'll give him the benefit of the doubt because of the stadium debt etc. but now we have been in a strong position financially for a few years and that excuse has well and truly dried up.

Adams he inherited but Vieira was bought as part of the condition for Wenger to come manage us, we was at Highbury then and no stadium debts.

i do nt mind if he puts together a interest free financial package, to wipe out the remaining stadium debt form the club in return for a slice of 30 % of the shares.

Exactly, so sick of the stadium debt being used as an excuse, nonsense, around 34 million from day one and still at that rate for some years to come, no debt is cleared, payments are the same!

Every year he finds another excuse not to spend money (Can't find quality in the market, the ones that are returning from injuries are like new signings, more than two new signings will affect the team's play, we can't compete with Chelsea or City, we have to pay the debt for the new stadium etc..

This is different to us fans expectation that when stadium debt repayments reduced, the aims of the club would increase to win the PL and challenge for the CL.

The reason why Wenger has been able to stay at arsenal for so long is because he is a demagogue, he gives excuses that the majority believe like stadium debts, FIFA fair play, youth development, refs and what not.

Bottom Line: There's been no mention of stadium debt and they are aiming to splash the cash for a Top striker....

The lack of CL money will be made up for by the huge increase in PL TV rights compared to what they were over the past 10 years whilst we were paying off debts, but nonetheless, Tottenham will struggle, at a time when the benefits of our new stadium will finally come good.

The debt of building their new stadium will drag them down for a long time, just as the Emirates has done to us, though Tottenham don't have the extra money that Champions League football brings, nor do they have a stable team and management.

First of all most supporters respect Arsene and they have been extremely patient when we were repaying the debt for the stadium.

For Ten (10) long years Wenger has sold our best players to help pay off the stadium debt and since then he has slowly started to build a squad of players that so for this season most fans have said are good enough in quality and depth to challenge for the premiership and improve our position in the Champions LeagFor Ten (10) long years Wenger has sold our best players to help pay off the stadium debt and since then he has slowly started to build a squad of players that so for this season most fans have said are good enough in quality and depth to challenge for the premiership and improve our position in the Champions Leagfor this season most fans have said are good enough in quality and depth to challenge for the premiership and improve our position in the Champions Leagfor the premiership and improve our position in the Champions League.

Seeing how quality players are moving in this transfer window am a very sad sad sad man.The other big clubs have confirmed they will spend big but for Wenger he said we have enough depth in the squad but if special player is available we can buy, now special players are not available without a bid.We have only one Arsene but we cant win major trophies with wenger he used to win them when it was a two horse race, only utd were a threat but now he cant repeat the invincible era or win epl 10 yrs can evidence there is competition and we are not in it.Clubs like chelsea are in debts cuz of buying wc players to win trophies, We put club into debt b4 to build stadium so he can generate more revenue for club owners and share holders

The feeling that we are being taken for a ride by the owner, having accepted high prices and no trophies due to stadium debt, the promised bright future is not going to happen because the owner is not interested in trophies.

we will need to be fighting for the title at least this season, not more excuses the money is there to spend and the stadium debt is comfortable, l as long as wenger get the players we need (big benz).

We had stadium debt... Prior to Arshavin deal, Wenger wanted Nasri, Nasri signed a new contract to help his old club get more in a transfer for him and Wenger just paid it while having stadium debt.

stadium debt could be used only for so long.The fact is arsenal cant match the financial strength of big clubs.One good signing every year just doesn't cut it as rest of the teams are buying 3 or 4 players that too top top player which he describes so often.Just do nt raise peoples expectations and not deliver at the end.I do beleive he is arrogant in the fact that he won't buy a cdm in mould of Vieira or toure bcoz he wants to prove that he can win it with smaller creative playes.Coquelin is good but no big club depends on a single player to carry them, there needs to be a backup always.