Sentences with phrase «for starters let»

For starters let's talk about how to acquire this new armor.

For starters let's not get it twisted.

For starters let's ask ourselves why we want to use whiteners.

I know that our Board stinks and they are not investing money in the club but for starters let s get rid of Wenger first.

For starters let's look at the origin of the word «God.»

Well, for starters let's quickly cover what not to do.

For starter let's be best friends and see where it goes!

Not exact matches

For starters, white - labelled e-commerce solution providers like LemonStand and BlackSquare let a wide range of merchants set up online storefronts at a fraction of the time and cost required by traditional IT channels.

For starters, let's acknowledge that millennials are not operating in their father's workplace.

Should the Redskins let Cousins walk, he'll have no shortage of suitors, with plenty of teams in the market for a franchise quarterback, either looking to take full advantage of an already established group of talented players (e.g. the Jacksonville Jaguars) or hoping to rebuild their team around a new starter (e.g. the New York Giants, the New York Jets, or the Cleveland Browns).

The free starter account lets you see for yourself what this is all about and even allows you to start building.

Let's take social media content for starters.

Let's talk Stalin and Mao Tsu Tung just for starters.

And just for starters, let Us kick off by condemning Adam's eldest son.

well for starters he started work on his idea of natural selection before he even met his wife, let alone lost any kids so you are off to a shaky start before you even try to claim anything else about evolution.

For starters, let's acknowledge the elephant in the room: music is full of surprises.

Ok, for starters, the author of this article is way off base from the beginning, and lets not kid ourselves that CNN will look for any way to shoot down something a conservative would like.

I also let them soak for 24 hours before baking and used a little sourdough starter in the dough to boot.

I substituted out some of the water and flour for my starter and made a sponge that I let sit overnight until it was nice and bubbly.

I have followed the instructions to the T, used a thermometer, fresh quality starter, heating pad, and let is sit for 7 hours and the in the fridge overnight.

Prepare your sourdough starter: If your starter has been in the refrigerator, let it warm up on the counter for an hour or two.

Well for starters we've been doing that with soup for oh, I don't know, centuries — so lets put the pretend trendyness of the concept behind us and move on to more important functional factors.

Let the starter rest in a dark 70 °F place for 12 hours and then place in the refrigerator.

Let's go back to making these crackers, that are paleo, vegan, egg - free and dairy - free (how's that for starters?)

First I mixed the starter with water and let it sit for about 5 minutes to wake it up.

Let your starter sit out for 2 - 5 days, stirring once per day to reincorporate the liquid that will settle on top.

Now I let the starter sit in a warm place, in room temperature, for about 22 hours.

of my 100 % hydration starter, mixed it with the liquid from the pretzel recipe and an equal weight of the flour and let it sit for 12 hours to mature.

Feed this reserved starter with 1 cup of flour and 1/2 cup water, and let it rest at room temperature for several hours, to get going, before refrigerating it.

The recipe is not entirely clear on this point, but I let the starter sit out at room temperature for one hour before chilling it.

Once all the buns have been shaped cover them and let them proof again for 3 - 6 hours (the proofing time will totally depend on the climate, activity of the starter and so many other factors).

This recipe calls for fed sourdough starter, which means you need to remove a cup of starter, use it in another recipe, feed your starter, let it sit for at least 5 hours, and then use a cup of the fed starter for the bread.

I've found that it works well to feed my starter the morning before I'm ready to start the bread, start the dough for the bread in the early evening, let it rise overnight, and then finish and bake it the next night.

We recommend letting your overnight starter rest for 12 - 16 hours, roughly overnight.

If you have 2 oz of starter, add 2 oz of water and 2 oz of flour and let it sit for 8 hours.

✔ FERMENTATION JAR FOR EXTRAORDINARY RESULTS - ideal jug to ferment your kombucha scoby; this wondrous jar is great for your kefir, sourdough starter, wine or beer; also use for pickling sauerkraut, carrots, pickles and more; preserve your homemade apple juice, grape juice, salsa, fruits, vegetables, syrups and sauces; let them simmer there up to a year to master desirable resuFOR EXTRAORDINARY RESULTS - ideal jug to ferment your kombucha scoby; this wondrous jar is great for your kefir, sourdough starter, wine or beer; also use for pickling sauerkraut, carrots, pickles and more; preserve your homemade apple juice, grape juice, salsa, fruits, vegetables, syrups and sauces; let them simmer there up to a year to master desirable resufor your kefir, sourdough starter, wine or beer; also use for pickling sauerkraut, carrots, pickles and more; preserve your homemade apple juice, grape juice, salsa, fruits, vegetables, syrups and sauces; let them simmer there up to a year to master desirable resufor pickling sauerkraut, carrots, pickles and more; preserve your homemade apple juice, grape juice, salsa, fruits, vegetables, syrups and sauces; let them simmer there up to a year to master desirable results

To make this ice cream Breakside Brewery first fermented a bretta - yeast based beer for us to use as a starter that we then pour over fresh cherries, let everything sit for a week or two and cross our fingers.

does this mean if i let it go for 5 days i will have 1 3/4 cups of starter left, or am i missing something?

Note that is says cold sourdough starter which means that you don't need to let it sit in room temperature for 12 hours before baking.

Let me list them: Alexis (LW — nailed starter) Ox (RW — played 1 game since Jan and is future CM) Theo (RW — not good enough for the starting 11) Welbz (LW / RW — 2nd fiddle to Alexis, used more for his work rate) Poldi / Campbell / Gnabry (only Gnabry has a future at the club.

Put Wisler in as the 5th starter, option him to Gwinnett and let him get stretched out for a start on the 10th?

Do you: Put Sims in as the 5th starter, option him to Gwinnett and let him get stretched out for a start on the 10th?

Your right I think, if we can get decent holding CM to help protect the back 4 then Ozil and Co will be able to focus on attacking more often, how - ever I will highlight how little effort Ozil puts in to winning the ball back For me Cazorla would be the starter because I have more confidence in him in getting back and winning the ball back with the TEAM and help us press higher up to force the opposition into making mistakes and letting in goals.

That's how title winning teams should be in the mental sense, unfortunately Wenger can't get most of his players to give 100 % each game, part of this is because he still relies on certain players that are nowhere near good enough to be starters for Arsenal let alone a top 4 club.

Benzema is the only Real Madrid true striker and starter, Madrid has to get replacemnt for him before they let him go which is difficult at this time because you could not find CF in the market right now.Yes, there are players like lewandowski, Cavani, Higuaín, Lacazzette, Gotze but are they really in the market?Is it easy to get them at this time?I doubt it.

Scholes claims Welbeck would unquestionably be a starter in Manchester United's current side, and he's furious with LVG and the Man United board for letting Welbeck and a few other players leave.

@NY Gunner, let me break it down for you.Chambers is not world class, he was not even on the 1st 11 of south Hampton, Debuchy was never a starter for France until Sagna became old, Cambell was unknown untill World cup, Gibbs not even a starter in England national squad, Flamini, Cocklin and Diaby (i do nt have what to say), Arteta has never even played for spain, our best goal keeper was not a starter for Poland until Wenger started to bench Fambiasky just to make the other look good, Koshienly is good though.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

So, let's plan on competing for a Super Bowl with Tom Compton or Danny Isidora as our starting right guard while our second round safety sits on the bench for a year behind two established starters and two back - ups who look like they'll be starters sooner rather than later?

AW needs to let him know he's not an automatic starter anymore w the players we have available and he has to FIGHT for it.