Sentences with phrase «for sticking to the science»

Good on our side for sticking to the science.

Not exact matches

Memrise, if you're not already familiar with it, is an amazing tool to help people learn anything from science facts to a foreign language more quickly using fun associations to make new words or ideas stick (I've used it personally and absolutely endorse it for memorizing new vocabulary especially).

In the current system, certain publications often «get stuck» with overly inflated valuations and it is often difficult to effectively criticize such publications because there does not exist an equivalent venue for informed criticism on par with Science and Nature.

Recent debates in the pages of First Thingsand other conservative journals over Darwin's theory of evolution and creationism reveal the degree to which Catholics seem stuck in the trees for want of seeing the forest, the lopsided degree to which the Church gives assent to philosophy without deeply exploring the particular science it considers a threat, (this journal, it goes without saying, excepted).

Because basic behavior science tells you if you have a motivating vision that you're much more likely to aim for it and stick with it.

because it was scientists that created the Nuclear bomb, in fact it was science that created all weapons... so by your logic, Science is to blame for the Death of EVERY human being in Warfare throughout time except for those killed by rocks and sticks that are unsharpened and / or killed by use of barehands... Science has slaughtered BILLIONS...... of course that's nonsensescience that created all weapons... so by your logic, Science is to blame for the Death of EVERY human being in Warfare throughout time except for those killed by rocks and sticks that are unsharpened and / or killed by use of barehands... Science has slaughtered BILLIONS...... of course that's nonsenseScience is to blame for the Death of EVERY human being in Warfare throughout time except for those killed by rocks and sticks that are unsharpened and / or killed by use of barehands... Science has slaughtered BILLIONS...... of course that's nonsenseScience has slaughtered BILLIONS...... of course that's nonsense right?

In the massive budget bill just passed, Congress stuck in language to require the Federal Trade Commission to conduct a cost / benefit analysis before finalizing a report that would provide the food industry with science - based nutrition guidelines for marketing to children.

«We are so thankful to the Governor for sticking to his word and listening to the science,» said Julia Walsh, with New Yorkers Against Fracking.

«It's interesting that the governor said his intention was to take the emotion out of the process and just rely on the science and that's the line that stuck,» said Scott Kurkoski, a lawyer for the pro-fracking Joint Landowners Coalition.

«We are so thankful to the Governor for sticking to his word and listening to the science,» Wash said.

The Senate panel's action also runs counter to the House Appropriations Committee, which decided to stick with the White House proposal to eliminate funding for the ARPA - E, a program designed to promote «revolutionary advances in fundamental and applied sciences» and further the nation's standing as a global leader in innovation.

WHEN Mostafa Ahmadi - Roshan, a chemist at the Natanz uranium enrichment plant in Iran, was killed on 11 January by a magnetic bomb stuck to his car, he became the fifth such victim in Iran, according to William Tobey of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University.

«We are trying to determine what kind of minerals in soil have a higher affinity for uranium; that is, what it will stick to,» said Dr. Nikolla Qafoku, a PNNL geochemist, who with Dr. Ravi Kukkadapu, an EMSL chemist, is lead author of the paper, which appears in Environmental Science & Technology.

When it comes to supplements, you might having trouble choosing what's most adequate for your goals, given the great number of choices with different price ranges we have today, but the best idea is to stick with those supported by science in terms of efficacy and safety.

He's done so much work to stick up for the science!

My science - oriented mind — just wonders where it got stuck... Best of luck to your husband... and for you without a toilet for the week.

I suppose if you're hungry enough for some science fiction, that might be reason enough to stick with the show.

But instead of trying to knock schools into shape with a regulatory hammer, they employed measuring sticks and magnifying glasses: each year states were asked to release information for every school on the performance of its students in math, reading, and science.

A few major areas I hope will receive attention during reauthorization are college / workplace readiness, including the promotion of more rigorous standards; greater accountability at the secondary level; more sophisticated policy and greater accountability for improving teacher effectiveness, particularly at the late elementary and secondary levels; a broadening of attention to math and science as well as to history; and refinements in AYP to focus greater attention and improvement on the persistently failing schools by offering real choices to parents of students stuck in such schools.

My response: For many students, learning math, English, history, science or language is an even bigger chore, but teachers persist in encouraging kids of all ages not only to stick with it, but also to find practical ways to share and demonstrate mastery of knowledge.

For each activity there is a lesson plan which lists the equipment you need for each activity, how to prep the activity and how to carry out the activity A coloured student instruction sheet which explains to students how to carry out the activity and the science behind it Any print outs I have produced to go with activities Activities includes are Building recycled droids Free Han Solo from the frozen carbonite Making galaxy jars Galaxy Oobleck Glow Stick Light Sabers Making Hovercrafts Making Star Wars Sound effects Straw Spaceships Use the Force Electrostatics Use the Force Magnetism Bubble wand LightsabFor each activity there is a lesson plan which lists the equipment you need for each activity, how to prep the activity and how to carry out the activity A coloured student instruction sheet which explains to students how to carry out the activity and the science behind it Any print outs I have produced to go with activities Activities includes are Building recycled droids Free Han Solo from the frozen carbonite Making galaxy jars Galaxy Oobleck Glow Stick Light Sabers Making Hovercrafts Making Star Wars Sound effects Straw Spaceships Use the Force Electrostatics Use the Force Magnetism Bubble wand Lightsabfor each activity, how to prep the activity and how to carry out the activity A coloured student instruction sheet which explains to students how to carry out the activity and the science behind it Any print outs I have produced to go with activities Activities includes are Building recycled droids Free Han Solo from the frozen carbonite Making galaxy jars Galaxy Oobleck Glow Stick Light Sabers Making Hovercrafts Making Star Wars Sound effects Straw Spaceships Use the Force Electrostatics Use the Force Magnetism Bubble wand Lightsabers

While it sounds like science fiction — it almost is — what it really means is that the vehicle is in the same mindset as the driver, whether they are commuting to work on the open highway, stuck in traffic, or competing for the fastest lap time on a racing circuit.

«It's not a simple science,» says Stobbe, the author of «How to Get Approved for the Best Mortgage Without Sticking a Fork in Your Eye» (really!).

Abandoning, for a moment, dystopia, information theory, or recalling Piranesi's prison etchings for the umpteenth time, along with metastasizing mutatis mutandis and all of the Popular Science pseudo-scientific (scientistic really) rhetoric that sticks so easily to the toothy surfaces of Terry Winters» work.

For years, helpful letter writers told us to stick to science.

I'm writing with regards to the rescue effort for that tourist ship stuck in the ice near Commonwealth Bay and the enormous impact of the rescue effort on Antarctic science programs.

This opening statement «'' One of the pillars of the case for man - made global warming is a graph nicknamed the hockey stick» states the science education level and the verificational level in relation to reference material of the journalist, IMO.

If you can't deal with the science matters then I for one will continue to stick with those who DO.

With A Disgrace to the Profession: The World's Scientists - in Their Own Words - on Michael E. Mann, His Hockey Stick, and Their Damage to Science: Volume One, he doesn't so much make it uncomfortable for Mann as eviscerate him.

For those of us who think science is about being open to new ideas and perspectives, Michael «hockey stick» Mann isn't the kind of scientist we'd want our kids to grow up to be.

If climatologists were to stick to science (and to stay out of the the policy making arena) then there would not be the need for disagreements among them.

For hurricanes, however, sticking to the science means it is still hard to point to an individual storm and say, yes!

«Over the years I have had many colleagues and higher level management having issues with for example my scientific dabbling in temperature measurements — which is not what I am paid for to work on — and more general having issues with my critical attitude...... there is tremendous pressure inside climate science to stick to the consensus.»

I assume if you're going to basically insult people for how they handle discussions of science you won't mind if we stick to discussions of science.

For example, understanding that global warming is not a proven science and that there is no circumstantial evidence for global warming alarmism — which is why we see goats like political charlatans like Al Gore showing debunked graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks — and, not understanding that climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing and that the climate change we observed can be explained by natural causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that and the fact that global warming alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor most of the principles upon which the country was foundFor example, understanding that global warming is not a proven science and that there is no circumstantial evidence for global warming alarmism — which is why we see goats like political charlatans like Al Gore showing debunked graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks — and, not understanding that climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing and that the climate change we observed can be explained by natural causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that and the fact that global warming alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor most of the principles upon which the country was foundfor global warming alarmism — which is why we see goats like political charlatans like Al Gore showing debunked graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks — and, not understanding that climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing and that the climate change we observed can be explained by natural causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that and the fact that global warming alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor most of the principles upon which the country was founded.

Mann's hockey stick vastly expanded the market for such cartoon certainties, and enabled the climate apocalyptics to hijack an entire field of science.

C: increase in atmospheric CO2 from pre-industrial to present is anthropogenic (D / A) S: best guess for likely climate sensitivity (NUM) s: 2 - sigma range of S (NUM) a: ocean acidification will be a problem (D / A) L: expected sea level rise by 2100 in cm (all contributions)(NUM) B: climate change will be beneficial (D / A) R: CO2 emissions need to be reduced drastically by 2050 (D / A) T: technical advances will take care of any problems (D / A) r: the 20th century global temperature record is reliable (D / A) H: over the last 1000 years global temperature was hockey stick shaped (D / A) D: data has been intentionally distorted by scientist to support the idea of anthropogenic climate change (D / A) g: the CRU - mails are important for the science (D / A) G: the CRU - mails are important otherwise (D / A)

Photograph 11: Building Science Corp «Skunkworks» Exposure Facility — To test tape resistance to UV and heat and rain we stick them outside for years and watch theTo test tape resistance to UV and heat and rain we stick them outside for years and watch theto UV and heat and rain we stick them outside for years and watch them.

There is NOTHING to relate ANY similarity for GRAVITY or «the Theory of Gravity» to either the «hockey stick» plot or «greenhouse supposition», certainly any such link is NOT found in SCIENCE... My only post to that thread, and that thread (being titled «hockey - stick - is - broken» last (it seems), is reprised here: ------ At April 25, 2006 2:38 AM, Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod (tm) said... It is of dubious value to even attempt to consider «tree growth» in terms solely of «temperature» and the quantity of refutation makes worthless the concept of doing such, regardless of tree / species numbers.

Based on the official university whitewashes of Climategate thus far in support of such corruption of science for political ends, the odds must be that they will surely find something, somewhere to pin on Wegman, to punish him for failing to validate the Hockey Stick, the poster child of alarmism.

For decades, the mainstream journalists have dutifully reported hysterical alarmism generated by a minority of scientists dedicated to the concept of human CO2 - caused catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW)... this style of sensationalist, tabloid «climate science» journalism however is dependent on either a condition of stuck - on - stupid mentality or a highly biased, politically motivated political agenda, not on scientific empirical evidence

I think scientists are stuck and have to answer the attacks on science whatever the motives for them are.

What more perfect classroom is there for tutoring the intelligent layman to be skeptical of the «known laws of science» than the stream of stupidity wrapped in obfuscating words than the hockey stick of Mann and the screaming doom from Hansem's mouth?

The effort to make TEMPERATURE (and plots of) somehow relevant to Climate Alteration is complete NON SCIENCE, and this is highlighted in the attempts to persist in protecting and «talking up; the «hockey stick» experiment with the «concepts» being the «picket fence» for the «greenhouse platform».

As IO have extensively proven in my papers and by proponent of the AGW (see for example Crowley, Science 2000), the traditional climate models produce a signature quite similar to the hockey stick graph by Mann which not only simply disagree with history but has also been seriously put in question under several studies.

Fudging and cherry - picking data to «erase» the cooling periods after 1940 and 1998 and to produce the infamous «hockey stick», publishing exceedingly biased studies to convince the public of a 97 % consensus, and revising Wikipedia articles to eliminate opposing evidence and opinions are reprehensible and repugnant actions for anyone working in science.

Mr Neese also finds time to put in a plug for my book «A Disgrace To The Profession»: The World's Scientists - In Their Own Words - On Michael E Mann, His Hockey Stick, And Their Damage to Science: Volume Onto put in a plug for my book «A Disgrace To The Profession»: The World's Scientists - In Their Own Words - On Michael E Mann, His Hockey Stick, And Their Damage to Science: Volume OnTo The Profession»: The World's Scientists - In Their Own Words - On Michael E Mann, His Hockey Stick, And Their Damage to Science: Volume Onto Science: Volume One:

That Manne manipulated his «hockey stick data» to produce a kink to «prove» AWG covering the industrial revolution to the present, is all the more amusing, not only for the juk science entailed in that abuse of maths but also in the breath - taking silliness involved in altogther eliminating the record which, before matters of science as laid out by Eshchenbach, simply makes nonsense of such claims.

The so - called «hockey stick» curve — a graph my co-authors and I published a decade - and - a-half ago showing modern warming in the Northern Hemisphere to be unprecedented for at least the past 1,000 years — is one among other areas of climate science where the evidence has become ever more compelling.

So, just in time for Michael E Mann's Congressional testimony this week, Watts Up With That posted a guest essay by Rick Wallace reflecting on my book «A Disgrace to the Profession»: The World's Scientists - in Their Own Words - on Michael E Mann, His Hockey Stick and Their Damage to Science - Volume One.