Sentences with phrase «for supernatural beings»

There is not a single shred of verified evidence for the supernatural beings and events in your books either.

Regarding archeological evidence for Biblical places and persons: Sure there is some, but there is not one single shred of evidence for the supernatural beings or events alleged to have been present there.

There is not a whit of verified evidence for the supernatural beings or events in those stories or writings.

There is not a whit of verified evidence for the supernatural beings nor events told about in the Bible.

Excessively credulous belief in and reverence for supernatural beings.

There is not a shred of verified evidence for the supernatural beings and events in that book (nor for the rest of the Middle Eastern Hebrew stories that were selected to be in the Bible).

A lovely little tale... problem is, there is no verified evidence for supernatural beings - angels, gods, demons, spirits (holy or otherwise).

There is not a shred of verified evidence for the supernatural beings or events told about in that book.

Maybe these types of books need a Truth in Advertising disclaimer: «There is no verified evidence for the supernatural beings and events presented in this book.»

There is not a shred of verified evidence for ANY supernatural beings or for their desires or promises.

a) Given accurate transmission of the Christian Bible (i.e. Jewish / OT and NT), b) Given the fulfillment of foretold specific prophecies (incl: Eze 37, Rev 13) in the Christian Bible Therefore, the God of the Christians is a viable contender for this supernatural being.

a) Given accurate transmission of the Jewish Bible, b) Given the fulfillment of foretold specific prophecies (incl: Eze 37) in the Jewish Bible Therefore, the God of the Jews is a viable contender for this supernatural being.

We already have what could be considered faster than light travel with quantum physics sp00ky action at a distance so we already know our understanding of the physics is what is flawed, not that there is some need for a supernatural being to explain the parts of it we don't yet understand.

Because there are credible explanations for most of those objects and phenomenon based on science and I have seen no credible evidence for any supernatural being, God or otherwise.

How can you do the same for a supernatural being that is, among other things, everywhere and nowhere, immanent and transcendent, knowable and incomprehensible?

Not exact matches

Day, 36, who is known for her work on TV and web shows like Dr. Horrible's Sing - Along Blog, Supernatural, and The Guild, helped define what a successful career in digital culture can look like and, in the process, has been bestowed the title of «queen of the geeks» (an honorific she has resisted).

Courage's desire to protect his beloved owner Muriel, who has a propensity for attracting supernatural beings, forces Courage to deal with some of the strangest supernatural creatures you've ever seen (e.g., Banana People, and a sentient toe).

-- Michael Scherer spent hours in early February interviewing Joe Arpaio, the former Maricopa County sheriff who had his conviction pardoned by Trump and is now running for Arizona's Senate seat: «Each of the Republicans running for Senate in Arizona this year claims a special bond with President Trump, but only one describes it as a supernatural connection beyond rational explanation.

It is well known for a supposed supernatural phenomena involving the ghost of Henry Wells, who was accused of burning down the courthouse more than a century ago but has reportedly be seen in the window.

Truth be told, Christ has already returned and the vast number of Christians missed Him, because they looked for a supernatural event that never was to be the method of His return.

And you believe that a supernatural being, «The Devil», is responsible for anything and everything you fear.

NO Christhinks - Even some atheists like myself have tremendous respect for Jesus Christ, even if we don't believe he was a supernatural being.

In the end, many conclude that any designer responsible for the complexity and precision observed in nature must be «beyond nature», or supernatural.

Nevermind the fact that the same problems you posed for an uncreated universe apply to your uncreated deity — and an uncreated universe is a helluva lot more probable and logical than an uncreated sentience capable of supernatural feats.

For all those who are talking to themselves today, thinking that some supernatural deity is listening to them, please seek professional psychiatric help before you hurt someone or yourself in the name of your sky fairy, vote against others» rights, or promote your chosen flavor of insanity over the scientific method.

Well, primarily, the supernatural component, since we ask for some type of evidence to prove that your claims of «god» are true.

For him, to find a basis for a peaceful and tolerant coexistence of people of different backgrounds, one had to turn either to a type of Christianity that was reduced to charitable works or to a natural religion and morality that did not invoke any supernatural revelatiFor him, to find a basis for a peaceful and tolerant coexistence of people of different backgrounds, one had to turn either to a type of Christianity that was reduced to charitable works or to a natural religion and morality that did not invoke any supernatural revelatifor a peaceful and tolerant coexistence of people of different backgrounds, one had to turn either to a type of Christianity that was reduced to charitable works or to a natural religion and morality that did not invoke any supernatural revelation.

There is a supernatural explanation (Genesis 1) for their origins.

It's made me more comfortable that I don't need a supernatural explanation for the way things are.»

The common thread for religion is belief in a supernatural actor.

You nothing about me, but I know you for someone willing to spout lies in the service of some supernatural being.

That is because the argument I'm making at his point in time is not for Christianity, but rather for the existence of the supernatural and the existence of God.

Don't be too upset with people for being this way — it takes a supernatural force to overcome the natural desire to lash out when you feel you've been shown up in some way.

East Eastern Christians see a dichotomy of God and creation Eastern theologians are largely unaffected by modernism Eastern theologians do not agonize over the existence of God Eastern theologians systematize the transcendent, the miraculous, and the mystical into their theology, without a concept of «supernatural» Eastern theologians have coherent and helpful answers for most practical spiritual problems (such as during bereavement) Eastern clergy, monastics, and lay experts have resources for spiritual direction, moral direction, and Eastern clergy, monastics, and lay experts have resources for spiritual direction, moral direction, and bereavement counseling; thus they do not outsource religious problems to secular experts.

In fact, there is nothing special about christianity — it is just one of many cults that claim to have all the answers, none of which provide any real evidence for any of their supernatural claims.

NDE's have been tested extensively for any kind of valid supernatural occurrence, and has failed every single time.

That there is no evidence for the supernatural claims of any religion?

You have chosen to believe it's not possible for God to exist a priori so any possible indication that he may, you simply reject as not possible even when there is no other scientific explanation for credible miraculous events (ones that can not be mere coincidences) other than supernatural.

I was in Tokyo for the 9.0 — never once thought about any supernatural being, but was thankful to real world engineers for designing buildings that stayed standing.

At most, god does exist because we find active evidence proving there was some sort of divine hand in the origin of life, which then leads us on the hunt for more evidence of that same gods existance throughout the fossil record and most likely will lead us to prove that the god of abraham is STILL man - made, but there is some other supernatural power out there.

We elect our leaders, and no supernatural beings are supposed to be used as an excuse for undemocratic activities.

There is a distinct difference in the «belief» derived from testable and empirical physical evidence which is repeatedly validated via successful predictions and applications in medicine, agriculture, engineering, etc, and the «belief» of those who rely on alleged supernatural, divinely - inspired narratives where the only application for these «beliefs» is apologetics.

There is some lovely, poetic material in the Quran, and a few areas of guidance for civilized behavior; but the claims of a supernatural basis for it are in no way substantiated (as is the case also with the Bible).

If you claim the methodology of neutralizing potentially confounding variables limits possibilities to that of the natural then you also make an argument for the supernatural never to be observed by science due to it's methodology.

The same can not be said for the belief system that those 1.6 billion people have (or any other belief system that is based on the supernatural, for that matter).

After 2,000 + years, there is no evidence for the existence of any god, a divine jesus or any alleged supernatural act, in The Babble or any other cult's magic book.

I agree that human beings are predisposed to spiritual or supernatural beliefs, probably as an evolutionary bi-product, fearing the unknown made for greater survival odds.

The world is full of many complex things which occur naturally & without any aid or suggestions the supernatural being involved, the only reason you opt for the «god did it» excuse is b / c we do not have a comprehensive understanding on how life originated, but we do have many sound hypotheses.

1) nothing in this physical universe is the reason for its own existence 2) A causal chain exists 3) no causal chain is of infinite length 4) Only the supernatural (that which exists outside of physical reality) can be the ultimate cause of all physical reality 5) That supernatural cause could not itself have a cause, because infinite causal chains do not exist 6) This eternal, supernatural enti.ty we call, God.

It is not falsifiable for the same reason all supernatural events are not (scientific methods precludes it)