Sentences with phrase «for supporting such claims»

Not exact matches

The Internal Revenue Service will expect you to have documents such as receipts, bank statements and supporting documentation for any business deductions you claim.

I lack a belief in a god or gods because there is simply NO empirical evidence to support such a claim — for YOUR version or anyone else's.

:... still we have a ton of physical evidence that God is real...» One point of view: Most, if not all, Atheists would disagree with this statement and ask for solid scientific evidence to support such a claim.

Unfortunately for you, not only is there absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support any of these claims, the existence of any such God leads to numerous questions and apparent inconsistencies for which none of you can provide convincing answers.

We're such terrible people for not acquiescing to your superior knowledge, wisdom, and judgement without issuing a demand for evidence in support of your claims.

Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...

It now seems that those who were claiming the Pope's support for such changes were probably trying to manipulate him.

First, Wickman claims that this discovery «has significant implications for the Judeo - Christian worldview, offering strong support for biblical beliefs» because «this new evidence strongly suggests that there was a beginning to our universe», and according to Wickman, any such beginning «sounds a lot like» Genesis 1:1's claim that God did it.

The addition of the doctrine of internal relations as a necessary condition for evolution can clarify three arguments used by Birch to support his claim that low levels of order, such as particles, must have a subjective as well as a mechanical aspect.

After Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a bill that outlaws «hom.ose.xual propaganda» in the country, Lively expressed pleasure and support for such a bill, and claimed in a September 2013 interview with NBC that he influenced Russian lawmakers who implemented it.

Hartshorne evidently recognizes the force of this reasoning because the other line of argument by which he at least appears to support his claim for a distinct class of theological analogies is to appeal to just such a direct experience of God.

The religious institutions which formed such people and continued to claim their loyalty took public responsibility in this sense for granted, The churches preached a gospel which supported responsible lives without needing to draw their members deeply into esoteric spiritual disciplines or arcane theological issues.

On other issues, such as the family, or «morality,» for which it claims support, the Reagan administration has the worst record of any recent administration with regard to religious liberty.

You believe you will live for ever after death, with zero evidence to support such a preposterous claim.

To some extent, the debate is already over for Catholics as Amnesty sold the pass on sexuality years ago; the organisation already supports a right to contraception including the abortifacient morning - after pill, which it claims does not cause abortion, and affirms «sexual rights», a term which includes such gems as the right to a pleasurable sex life.

whether for the right or wrong reasons, our leader chose to stay on when things took a turn of sorts... a new owner arrived on the scene, plans for a new stadium emerged and Wenger became the bearer of bad news... he sold us on a new story, one that required patience on our parts... financial constraints were the order of the day, so that the enormous sums spent on the new venue could be recouped... although some would question the validity of such claims, why wouldn't they believe their faithful leader... according to those within the hierarchy, the future never looked so bright, as this new home would ensure our place among the elites for years to come... as we all know now these claims were a well constructed fabrication and so those who feel they were duped in the process are infuriated and rightly so... the fact that this club and it's manager have continually misled the fans, especially following Gazidis's claims about our financial liquidity, simply rubbed more salt in an already gaping wound... this surely isn't how you treat your «family», especially when they supported you through the supposed «lean» years... it was a dirty trick played by Kroenke but the fact is was orchestrated by Wenger himself hurt the most... as for those in the media, many of whom are former players or longtime pundits, who observed the early years firsthand, saw this as the perfect opportunity to vent the anger they felt towards this pretentious man once and for all... all in all, karma's a bitch

The liability insurance which comes with British Cycling membership provides cover of up to # 10million in the event of a claim being made against you for an incident which is your fault, but will not cover items such as medical bills, re-patriation and legal support in the event of an incident abroad.

Such thinking leads to or supports things like far - right Hindu nationalism, for example, or absurd claims that epistemic violence is the same or worse (as Spivak once famously claimed) than actual violence, or harmful rejections of science, or the very essentialism denied by its proponents.

Companies such as Nestlé actively promote this idea, following their statements of support for breastfeeding with idealising claims for products, as in the above example.

When new parents see this kind of marketing for infant formula, they're likely to believe such claims are based on rigorous scientific support, or maybe even actual testing by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The World Health Assembly calls for an end to promotional claims on foods for infants and young children because they generally mislead parents and undermine independent information from health workers, mother support groups and expert sources such as NHS Choices.

As with any such intentions, the actual rules are gamed, resulting in excessive prices in the US (especially for so - called orphan drugs) while claims that this system is necessary for further development of new drugs are not empirically supported.

Opponents claimed to support the principle of reform but rejected measures such as widespread elections for new lords, which they said would threaten the primacy of the elected House of Commons.

He says HIV programs for MSM must concentrate on key institutions such as the media and government policymakers; confront religious leaders and their claims that homosexuality is both a sin and a legacy of Western colonialism; independently fund agencies serving MSM; and bring the force of U.N. agencies to bear in support of human rights and good governance.

Claiming that many universities do not give new lecturers enough support in fulfilling their job requirements, such as course development and supervising students, the report concludes that «institutions should be required to submit a staff development strategy as a precondition for the release of research funding.»

Although the work provided some evidence supporting the claim that Colombian planes had failed to respect the limit, Mena did not feel that the results were sufficiently certain for him to testify at The Hague, because parameters such as the height and velocity of the Colombian planes were unknown.

As usual for such scary stories, these claims are only weakly supported by science — except for the ones that are outright fabrications.

As for Colin Campbell's China Study, often cited as proof that plant - based diets are healthier than those containing animal foods, the data on consumption and disease patterns collected by the Cornell University researchers in their massive dietary survey do not support such claims.

Three years later, and still no support for such a bold claim as «Organic, grass - fed animal fat is one of the healthiest things you can eat.»

Just a few days ago I came across a view on Russian and Ukrainian women as seeking «immigration support in exchange for sex» that was openly promoted through a major technology blog claiming modern outlook (by a female blogger), showing an appalling lack of understanding and social responsibility for the effects such publications cause.

It also supports over the counter sales, allows either caterers and schools to justifiably claim that the containers they sell can be recovered for recycling after - use, and also carries numerous other benefits; such as improved janitor utilisation (so less time's spent on litter control / cleaning), reduction in skip use as materials are removed separately for recycling and / or are stored in a compacted form, and reduction of carbon emissions within the recovery chain.

Not all businesses can claim the Employment Allowance; there are some that are excluded such as those who employ someone for personal, household or domestic work, such as a nanny, au pair, chauffeur, gardener or care support worker.

Writing Task The Lesson Level Learning Goal for this task is: Construct and present an oral and written argument supported by empirical evidence and scientific reasoning to support the claim that activities such as deforestation or reforestation can cause changes in the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

For anybody else it is not much better than an ostentatious nod toward «Going Green» that the Kindle, despite having numbers to support such a claim, fails to advertise on its own.

Guarantees for other nutrients may be required to support claims made in labeling (such as «High in calcium and vitamin A»), and manufacturers may include voluntary guarantees for other nutrients.

There really is no way to support such claims, but for those who have worked with dogs that are supposed to have separation anxiety only to find out later that these are nothing more than attention - getting tactics can truly attest to the presence of simulated separation anxiety in dogs.

Unfair Comparisons But Hawkins» findings are insufficient to supports such claims; indeed, his methodology doesn't allow for them.

McCaskill found no support for such a claim.

Climate scientists know this, but still there are people outside of climate science who will claim or imply such things if it helps make the news or generate support for their political or business agenda.

If they can clearly support their hypotheses it will be interesting - but as it stands I see little support for such claims.

«The messages of the two points outlined in the extract above are: (1) the claims about increases in frequency and intensity of extreme events are generally not supported by actual observations and, (2) official information about climate science is largely controlled by agencies through (a) funding choices for research and (b) by the carefullyselected (i.e. biased) authorship of reports such as the EPA Endangerment Finding and the National Climate Assessment.»

There are some who claim this has already been done, but this is not the case for the numbers thrown around have not undergone a rigorous debate or analysis and, as such, this number is highly controversial and dependent upon whether or not you are a «denier» or a support of AGW.

There doesn't seem to be much point in trying to blame me for your inability to demonstrate the magical properties of CO2, or even your inability to provide a falsifiable hypothesis in support of such a bizarrely unscientific claim.

It is for those making such claims to support their hypothesis otherwise the null can not be rejected.

In a further blow, the looming UK referendum on EU membership is creating uncertainty for investors, while the Tory government has reined back sharply on support for renewables such as onshore wind and solar power, claiming cost reasons.

Such revisions make for tremendous arguments and competing claims about whether cherry picking of data has been used to support the predictions of the AGW theoretical models.

Even if no such claims were made for Wegman's work, and aside from the fact that his «analysis» didn't support his conclusions, the plagiarism would still be as obvious and egregious.

Such revisions make for tremendous arguments and competing claims about whether cherry picking of data has been used to support the predictions of the AGW theoretical models (15,16).

With the CCC being responsible for informing decisions with consequences for policy decades into the future, it reflects very badly on the CCC that its Chair routinely makes such uncompromising, and unfounded claims in public, which can not be supported with evidence, apparently to defend the CCC's advice to Parliament from criticism.

In effect, the deputy judge made findings of fact with respect to the other claims for damages which do not support a finding of bad faith that would be essential to establishing such claim.