ATM fees, overdraft fees, insufficient balance fees, and even fees
for talking to a human.
In some cases, your best bet
for talking to a human may be to go visit a business in person.
The telephone isn't the only option
for talking to a human being anymore.
Not exact matches
To find the human resources outsourcing solutions for small businesses, we began by talking to business owners themselves, as well as some of the professionals who advise the
To find the
human resources outsourcing solutions
for small businesses, we began by
talking to business owners themselves, as well as some of the professionals who advise the
to business owners themselves, as well as some of the professionals who advise them.
For example, when political newcomer David Brat successfully challenged House Republican majority leader Eric Cantor
to represent Virginia in the U.S. Congress, it came as a surprise only
to those reporters who didn't bother
to go
to Virginia and
talk to «actual
humans,» as Rutenberg observes (echoing an earlier analysis by Washington Post media reporter Paul Farhi).
Chatbots are the most available use of AI
for businesses but when you customer wants
to talk to a
human, make certain they can.
Now, he's ready
to talk again, donating money
for research into the
human brain.
The pre-eminent American science journalist, Gleick herein explores the history and effects of knowledge communication between
humans, drawing a link from African
talking drums and the earliest alphabets through the telegraph — once «a nervous system
for the Earth» —
to Wikipedia and Twitter, and the current state of information overload from which so many claim
to suffer.
With chatbots, businesses can eliminate a lot of the
human effort required
for letting users «
talk»
to them through Messenger.
And yet, we seem
to have settled
for Tay, a mildly annoying chatbot that is «learning» how
to talk like a
human being through artificial intelligence (and likely backed by a Microsoft cloud infrastructure).
Assuming the letter you've received doesn't paint the whole picture
for you, calling this number will be well worth it as
talking to a person not only helps you understand the nuances of the situation but there's comfort in knowing that a
human being with a name and a face at the IRS is there
to help you figure things out.
APIs are the standard way
for computer programs
to «
talk»
to one another without
human intervention.
It will take at least a couple of years
for Theralase Technologies Inc.'s cancer treatment technology
to become regulated (and at least a year before we know how well it works on
humans), but the healthcare tech they have under development is worth
talking about.
It is not uncommon
for founders
to fight amongst themselves or teams
to develop silos that simply can't stomach
talking with other groups so they avoid
human contact and revert
to flaming wars on email or Slack.
When I used
to do a lot of recruiting we used
to call it «hanging yourself» because people who
talk for long periods of time without seeking feedback are generally not self - aware or good at
human interaction.
To his surprise, they talk on the phone for over an hour, and Fralic not only walks away with a comprehensive download on the industry, but a thesis on networking he's adhered to ever since: The best way to be highly influential is to be human to everyone you mee
To his surprise, they
talk on the phone
for over an hour, and Fralic not only walks away with a comprehensive download on the industry, but a thesis on networking he's adhered
to ever since: The best way to be highly influential is to be human to everyone you mee
to ever since: The best way
to be highly influential is to be human to everyone you mee
to be highly influential is
to be human to everyone you mee
to be
human to everyone you mee
to everyone you meet.
For while this House may be dragged down by dispiriting words and accusations, it is brought lowest by the
talking point and the use of precious time and adult
human beings in business attire
to convey scripted banalities.
Please, any Christian, honestly answer the following: The completely absurd theory that all 7,000,000,000
human beings are simultaneously being supervised 24 hours a day, every day of their lives by an immortal, invisible being
for the purposes of reward or punishment in the «afterlife» comes from the field of: (a) Astronomy; (b) Medicine; (c) Economics; or (d) Christianity You are about 70 % likely
to believe the entire Universe began less than 10,000 years ago with only one man, one woman and a
talking snake if you are a: (a) historian; (b) geologist; (c) NASA astronomer; or (d) Christian I have convinced myself that gay $ ex is a choice and not genetic, but then have no explanation as
to why only gay people have ho.mo $ exual urges.
Thus anticipating when it will rain, snow, be hot, cold, windy and so on, in some
human cultures even
talking, praying, and perform rituals
to ask the earth
for food, water, protection, shelter and so on.
The idea that a being would create the entire thing — with 400,000,000,000 galaxies, EACH with 100, 000,000,000 starts and even more planets, then sit back and wait 13,720,000,000 years
for human beings
to evolve on one planet so he could «love them» and send his son
to Earth
to talk to a nomadic group of Jews about sheep and goats in Iron Age Palestine (while ignoring the rest of the 200 million people then alive) makes no sense
to us.
That said: «But god did not foresee — that man would want a companion» = > «It is not good
for the man
to be alone» are the words used — so God did know and provided «that the snake would
talk to the
humans» = > «the serpent was more crafty than any other animal» - deception required capacity
to deceive «that the
humans would choose knowledge (and why else was that tree there)» = > It was not knowledge but knowledge of good and evil.
I find meditation, and compassion
for self
to be conducive
to what you
talk of with loving God and mankind — sometimes in mysterious, unfathomable and transcendent ways, encountering the power
to open up men and women
to each other and God in love peace justice and
human dignity.
-- and
talks, and
talks: I was interviewed
for the Derek Gilbert podcast recently about Obamacare, health care rationing, the danger of bioethics
to the vulnerable, animal rights, and
human exceptionalism.
Well if it's slightly more evidence of the existence of a man outside of Italy in the 1st century who was born of a virgin, died
for 3 days before resurrecting himself, then explained he only died because of «original sin» which is the idea that a woman ate magical apple given from a
talking snake in a garden at the beginning of time which caused all
humans to go
to hell when they died.
For all the
talk of justice and of opportunities, it doesn't really help young men and women who want
to marry and have families - in other words,
to ensure the future of the
human race in stability and affection.
But if we dispense with God -
talk altogether, we may find that we have not achieved the freedom of maturity at all, but rather lost it by confining our discourse
to such limits as no longer allow room
for the
human spirit
to breathe and move.
One aspect of God -
talk,
for example, which is overdue
for elimination is that which tries
to look
for evidence of God in the areas of
human ignorance, and which seeks
to use him as the explanation of all we do not understand.
The fact that some animals can not reason or
talk in language we understand should be as irrelevant
to us as is the fact that some
humans in relation
to whom we have ethical obligations — severely retarded children,
for example — can neither reason nor
talk.
And now
to provide you with a road map
for the rest of my first
talk, in good Trinitarian fashion (I noticed Bob Keck was following this last night, too, with his three periods of
human development) there will be three parts
to my
talk.
t its most fundamental level, Christianity requires a belief that an all - knowing, all - powerful, immortal being created the entire Universe and its billions of galaxies 13,720,000,000 years ago (the age of the Universe) sat back and waited 10,000,000,000 years
for the Earth
to form, then waited another 3,720,000,000 years
for human beings
to gradually evolve, then, at some point gave them eternal life and sent its son
to Earth
to talk about sheep and goats in the Middle East.
For we shall then be all too likely to dismiss death as a mere incident, to think of judgment without due seriousness, and to regard heaven and hell (our possible human destiny, for good or for ill) as nothing more than «fairy - tale» ta
For we shall then be all too likely
to dismiss death as a mere incident,
to think of judgment without due seriousness, and
to regard heaven and hell (our possible
human destiny,
for good or for ill) as nothing more than «fairy - tale» ta
for good or
for ill) as nothing more than «fairy - tale» ta
for ill) as nothing more than «fairy - tale»
talk.
For an interesting insight into
human nature,
talk to some of those members of our society who, in fact, are constantly lied
to,
to the point where they have come
to expect falsehood.
There are four affirmations about Jesus Christ that historically have been stressed in Christian faith: (1) Jesus is truly
human, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, living a
human life under the same
human conditions any one of us faces — thus Christology, statement of the significance of Jesus, must start «from below,» as many contemporary theologians are insisting; (2) Jesus is that one in whom God energizes in a supreme degree, with a decisive intensity; in traditional language he has been styled «the Incarnate Word of God»; (3)
for our sake,
to secure
human wholeness of life as it moves onward toward fulfillment, Jesus not only lived among us but also was crucified
for us — this is the point of
talk about atonement wrought in and by him; (4) death was not the end
for him, so it is not as if he never existed at all; in some way he triumphed over death, or was given victory over it, so that now and forever he is a reality in the life of God and effective among humankind.
I think that most of this is baby
talk, a way
for the infant
human race
to understand his own nature.
But on the other hand, when in
talking about sin one
talks only of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect
to all such things up
to a certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues
to be or wills
to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a
human self is morally under obligation
to God with respect
to every most secret wish and thought, with respect
to quickness in comprehending and readiness
to follow every hint of God as
to what His will is
for this self.
Existentialist theologians,
for example, seem
to forget entirely that
human existence, about which they
talk so much, has a location in time and space and in a given part of the natural order.
Why do you
talk about only what he didn't menage
to do, or what was wrong in his pontificate?Yes, I agree there were many things that could have been resolved in better way, but he was only a
human and as everybody could make mistakes.
To me what is important in his pontificate is that he was a first pope who «opened «the church
to people, who travelled a lot, met with people, went
to synagogue, did much
to abolish communism.Sure, he wasn't ideal, but
for me the best pope so far.
The idea that a being would create the entire thing — with 400,000,000,000 galaxies, EACH with 100, 000,000,000 starts and even more planets, then sit back and wait 13,720,000,000 years
for human beings
to evolve on one planet so he could «love them» and send his son
to Earth
to talk to a nomadic group of Jews about sheep and goats in Greco - Roman Palestine (while ignoring the rest of the 200 million people then alive) makes no sense
to us.
To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter..
To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying
to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter..
to say... my point was
to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter..
to be able
to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter..
to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something
to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter..
to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we
human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator,
for example not
to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter..
to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing,
human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was
talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like
for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop
to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter..
to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes
to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter..
to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....
The idea that a being would create the entire thing — with 400,000,000,000 galaxies, EACH with 100, 000,000,000 stars and even more planets, then sit back and wait 13,720,000,000 years
for human beings
to evolve on one planet so he could «love them» and send his son
to Earth
to talk to a nomadic group of Jews about sheep and goats in Iron Age Palestine (while ignoring the rest of the 200 million people then alive) makes no sense
to us.»
Also the bible
talks about imperfect
humans tendency
to struggle
for dominance, and this results in wars, oppression, and suffering.
So in case what has been expounded here is correct, in case there is no incommensurability in a
human life, and what there is of the incommensurable is only such by an accident from which no consequences can be drawn, in so far as existence is regarded in terms of the idea, Hegel is right; but he is not right in
talking about faith or in allowing Abraham
to be regarded as the father of it;
for by the latter he has pronounced judgment both upon Abraham and upon faith.
«If you
talk to people who've campaigned around the world
for human rights and religious rights, they would say that where we are starting is actually on a path that could lead
to the same sort of regimes that are elsewhere in the world, certainly in terms of persecution of Christians,» he said.
It is natural
for us as
human beings
to breathe, sleep, eat, walk,
talk — it is part of the nature of the
human being
to do that kind of thing.
Also, it would have no place
for the
talk of
human rights and their extension
to other creatures.
The love commandments of Jesus and his concern
for the weak and helpless impel us
to political and economic action in our time, although it is generally admitted that what Jesus was
talking about was not particular strategies, but the relation of persons
to God and
to one another in every
human relationship.
Once you begin
to read [the Bible], if you're reading the prophets where they're
talking about exchanging the poor
for a pair of sandals, and what happens when you have a widening gap between the ruling wealthy elites and the poor masses who can't feed their kids, and how this is an affront
to what it means
to be
human, if at that point you're like, «Well, is this inerrant?»
He looked out over the audience of his fellow «Extropians,» gathered
for their fourth convention (he'd chosen the name as the opposite of «entropy»), then delivered a
talk titled «The Ultrahuman Revolution: Amendments
to the
Human Constitution.»
There is
talk of democracy in El Salvador, but the government's «respect
for human rights» is a tactic
to deepen the war.
They grow up believing in an Eternal Hell of fire and brimstone,
talking snakes, the Doctrine of Original Sin, animals in an ark, a Young Earth paradigm, the notion that people lived
to be hundreds of years old a few thousand years ago, patriarchs that practiced child sacrifice and committed genocides, books that are supposed words of gawd that contradict real world observations, deities that kill their own children (
human manifestations of their own selves)
for the sake of sins that they never committed, the symbolic cannibalism and vampirism of a deity... I could go on
for days.