Not exact matches
Yet the risk of a
spill from the pipeline itself or from
tankers offshore is overwhelmingly borne by B.C. Short of sharing royalty revenues with B.C. — note how both the B.C. Liberals and their NDP opponents support plans
for liquefied natural gas terminals, which would boost gas revenues in B.C. — there's no way
for Alberta or an Albertan prime minister to bring B.C. onside.
Kinder Morgan bears no liability
for oil
spills originating from a
tanker that docks at its oil terminus, but this too should be changed, requiring the pipeline operator to share the liability as long as the
tanker is in Canadian waters.
Last November, the Island Trust expressed concerns to Transport Canada about preparedness
for bitumen
spills associated with
tankers that routinely pass through the Gulf Islands.
According to the unit's postmortem on the
spill, the national contingency plan
for cleaning up
spills would not have coped if large quantities of the
tanker's cargo of crude oil had come ashore.
Methane hydrates, after all, were largely responsible
for corrupting the containment dome intended to stop the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil
spill rising from the ocean bottom; the viscous mixture clogged the dome and a redirection pipe intended to take leaking oil to a
tanker waiting above.
And with the way tar sands oil sinks in water, a
tanker or pipeline
spill in the area would be devastating
for the region.
He sent me a link to an article he wrote
for the then fledgling BBC News website back in 1999, a few years after the oil
tanker Sea Empress ran aground on the coast of Wales,
spilling more than 72,000 tonnes of crude along a coastline that's a favourite
for ramblers and nature enthusiasts, not to mention the fishing grounds.
The network's latest advocacy
for fossil fuels comes on the 25th anniversary of the Exxon Valdez oil
spill, the most environmentally devastating oil
tanker spill in American history.
IMO took over responsibility
for this treaty in 1959, but it was not until 1967, when the
tanker Torrey Canyon ran aground off the coast of the United Kingdom and
spilled more than 120,000 tons of oil into the sea, that the shipping world realized just how serious the pollution threat was.
With the approval of the Kinder Morgan pipeline, we expect an increase in
tanker traffic by 700 % through the Salish Sea, meaning more oil moving through pipelines and more export terminals, making Washington State a target
for dangerous
spills and explosions.
Some opponents may also exaggerate the potential
for a public health catastrophe resulting from a
spill in Vancouver harbour, as well as the effect of increased
tanker traffic on the health of struggling Salish Sea orca populations.
Things like actually implementing Enbridge's «voluntary»
spill and
tanker safety plan, and holding nearly $ 1 billion in liability coverage, including $ 100 million in «ready cash» that can be accessed within 10 business days of a large
spill to pay
for cleanup costs.
The proposed route
for the oil
tankers travels through Heiltsuk and Kitasoo Xai» xais» territory, and the potential of an oil
spill along the
tanker route places the Nations» very way of life at risk.
Gitxaala has filed evidence with the JRP to suggest that
for them, the risks and effects of
tanker traffic and a marine oil
spill outweigh any potential economic benefits.
There, diluted bitumen would be loaded on to
tankers for export, thus introducing the risk of oil
spills from heavy oil
tankers to Canada's Pacific north coast
for the first time.